Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Posted: Fri January 13, 2017 7:13 pm
So did Jeff Reardon, let's throw him in there too.philpritchard wrote:Smith only really gets the kind of support he does because he held the save record for a while.
So did Jeff Reardon, let's throw him in there too.philpritchard wrote:Smith only really gets the kind of support he does because he held the save record for a while.

Seems to strike me as a modern day Phil Simms, in more way than one. Hopefully he's actually better at his post-retirement job than Simms, though.Simple Torture wrote:If he's really gone for good, I am wondering if anyone here wants to make a "pro" case for this fella:
no, I would not like to make a "pro" case for him.Simple Torture wrote:If he's really gone for good, I am wondering if anyone here wants to make a "pro" case for this fella:
How so? The the big pro for Davis was dominating postseason performances that resulted in two rings, with the con being that he had a short career. Romo's a bit of the opposite: a longish, steady career of above average performance, but notoriously subpar playoff performances.Simple Torture wrote:If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
To clarify: I'm imagining the case someone would have to make; I don't think he's in, ever. But I do think it'd be a similar case, just not exactly the same: yeah, his career was longer, but QBs tend to have longer careers than running backs anyways. And he was cut down by injuries right after his career-best season and a dominating playoff performance. If Dez Bryant catches that ball, I think the conversation might be different.Green Habit wrote:How so? The the big pro for Davis was dominating postseason performances that resulted in two rings, with the con being that he had a short career. Romo's a bit of the opposite: a longish, steady career of above average performance, but notoriously subpar playoff performances.Simple Torture wrote:If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
Dez did the catch that ball and the conversation should be different.Simple Torture wrote:To clarify: I'm imagining the case someone would have to make; I don't think he's in, ever. But I do think it'd be a similar case, just not exactly the same: yeah, his career was longer, but QBs tend to have longer careers than running backs anyways. And he was cut down by injuries right after his career-best season and a dominating playoff performance. If Dez Bryant catches that ball, I think the conversation might be different.Green Habit wrote:How so? The the big pro for Davis was dominating postseason performances that resulted in two rings, with the con being that he had a short career. Romo's a bit of the opposite: a longish, steady career of above average performance, but notoriously subpar playoff performances.Simple Torture wrote:If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
Yescutuphalfdead wrote:Max Scherzer
As of right now, he's an easy no. But he's got a hell of a peak under his belt and at this point probably just needs to do some compiling for a bunch of years.cutuphalfdead wrote:Max Scherzer
If he keeps this going for another 2 or 3 years beyond this season, he's got that 7 year peak that everyone likes in a HoFer. I think he's closer than you're giving him credit for.philpritchard wrote:As of right now, he's an easy no. But he's got a hell of a peak under his belt and at this point probably just needs to do some compiling for a bunch of years.cutuphalfdead wrote:Max Scherzer