Red Mosquito

4/5 wrote:Pelosi is giving up her leadership.

Bi_3 wrote:This could get awkward:

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigatio ... k/3076235/

How so? If Paul was primarily animated by:

1) Trying to prevent freaking DePape out

2) Trying to prevent DePape from being injured by the cops

Then this is entirely consistent with everything else we were told. It's especially dumb for an 82 year old to give that much consideration to a home invader, but hey, maybe he's a true believer in the progressive stack.

4/5 wrote:Pelosi is giving up her leadership.

The Dems have been a dumpster fire of strategy. I'm sure that'll evolve into a trainwreck now.

Hot take alert: I think Pelosi was a much more effective party leader than she's given credit for.

I dread asking how one defines "effective".

where are all the girthy-dicked Gen X obama administration officials that the world has been waiting to burst on the political scene and save america from the slobbery of the masses?

too bad Beto is a moron he prob has a pretty big d*ck

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:This could get awkward:

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigatio ... k/3076235/

How so? If Paul was primarily animated by:

1) Trying to prevent freaking DePape out

2) Trying to prevent DePape from being injured by the cops

Then this is entirely consistent with everything else we were told. It's especially dumb for an 82 year old to give that much consideration to a home invader, but hey, maybe he's a true believer in the progressive stack.

It's not though, remember Miguel Almaguer was benched by NBC for basically say this a week ago.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/20 ... ted-story/

Impressive that McConnell can vote AGAINST interracial marriage protections while being married to an Asian woman for the past 29 years.

What protections for interracial marriage were we lacking?

Dunno, but Cocaine Mitch ain’t havin’ ‘em.

Sounds like maybe there's more to that.

BurtReynolds wrote:What protections for interracial marriage were we lacking?

BurtReynolds wrote:What protections for interracial marriage were we lacking?

None. They voted against it because they don't feel that, despite amendments trying to address their concerns, the bill sufficiently protects religious orgs from more gay-wedding-cake style fiascos.

Bi_3 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:What protections for interracial marriage were we lacking?

None.

false

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:What protections for interracial marriage were we lacking?

None.

false

Go on....

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:What protections for interracial marriage were we lacking?

None.

false

Go on....

Roe

Wait is epilogue saying he agrees with Kanye about abortion killing millions of black babies? Is epilogue Ye-pilled?