Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Sun November 16, 2014 4:26 am
Sintersteller?
But, like, Noah Baumbach is so hip to modern youth, man...malice wrote:watched frances ha last night...
it wasn't really 'bad', but it didn't register much of anything at all when I think about it/
I loved it, bit I've actually known a lot of people like that and am a struggling shifty artist myself, so I had a little more to chew on. I thought the lead was fantastic.malice wrote:watched frances ha last night...
it wasn't really 'bad', but it didn't register much of anything at all when I think about it/
i don't think the actors or the context was my issue at all...Orpheus wrote:I loved it, bit I've actually known a lot of people like that and am a struggling shifty artist myself, so I had a little more to chew on. I thought the lead was fantastic.malice wrote:watched frances ha last night...
it wasn't really 'bad', but it didn't register much of anything at all when I think about it/
Frances Ha depicted people that I know and share experiences with. The issues the movie deals with, the struggles of friendship and expectation and phoniness and all of that struck a major chord with me. It doesn't have the replay value necessarily that something like Drinking Buddies has, but I thought Frances Ha was one of the best films of 2012. A really lovely a brilliant mediation on what it means (the self-inflicted drama and letdowns) to be a young artist in NYC today.malice wrote:i don't think the actors or the context was my issue at all...Orpheus wrote:I loved it, bit I've actually known a lot of people like that and am a struggling shifty artist myself, so I had a little more to chew on. I thought the lead was fantastic.malice wrote:watched frances ha last night...
it wasn't really 'bad', but it didn't register much of anything at all when I think about it/
what exactly did it, uh, say? I mean what exactly did you chew on?
I think it's just a generational divide. Because that's one of the points the movie is making.malice wrote:you know, i guess i expect a movie about artistic people, made BY artistic people to be more than a set of ironic little scenes that say nothing at all other than: here we are. huh. what do you know about that.
okdurdencommatyler wrote:I think it's just a generational divide. Because that's one of the points the movie is making.malice wrote:you know, i guess i expect a movie about artistic people, made BY artistic people to be more than a set of ironic little scenes that say nothing at all other than: here we are. huh. what do you know about that.
I don't think it can just be chalked up to a generational divide; I'm of the younger generation and I'm totally with malice on this one.durdencommatyler wrote:I think it's just a generational divide. Because that's one of the points the movie is making.malice wrote:you know, i guess i expect a movie about artistic people, made BY artistic people to be more than a set of ironic little scenes that say nothing at all other than: here we are. huh. what do you know about that.
I'm sorry if I can't be more helpful. Like Nate said, there are A LOT of people that really disliked the movie, or didn't get anything out of it. So... who knows?malice wrote:okdurdencommatyler wrote:I think it's just a generational divide. Because that's one of the points the movie is making.malice wrote:you know, i guess i expect a movie about artistic people, made BY artistic people to be more than a set of ironic little scenes that say nothing at all other than: here we are. huh. what do you know about that.
Oh yes, that's true. Girls is way better. Absolutely. But that doesn't take away from Frances Ha. There's room for both.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Also, I don't see anything in Frances Ha that Girls didn't already do much better and with a lot more depth and honesty.
But in a world in which Girls exists, does Frances Ha really matter?durdencommatyler wrote:Oh yes, that's true. Girls is way better. Absolutely. But that doesn't take away from Frances Ha. There's room for both.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Also, I don't see anything in Frances Ha that Girls didn't already do much better and with a lot more depth and honesty.
Of course. Different voice. Different story. Different characters. Some variations on themes. Different goals, even if just on a micro level. Absolutely.LoathedVermin72 wrote:But in a world in which Girls exists, does Frances Ha really matter?durdencommatyler wrote:Oh yes, that's true. Girls is way better. Absolutely. But that doesn't take away from Frances Ha. There's room for both.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Also, I don't see anything in Frances Ha that Girls didn't already do much better and with a lot more depth and honesty.