Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Fri August 16, 2013 1:27 pm
Fuck yes!
yep, and not very accuratestupidmop wrote:That was Mike. Mike's always chipper though.
Ugh. You're so right. I think of all of them, it's Stone I trust the most. Matt is just too damn happy about everything.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:yep, and not very accuratestupidmop wrote:That was Mike. Mike's always chipper though.
I'm hoping it's this.EJ wrote:Jeff seemed initially excited a few years ago. Then, the more recently the "I haven't listened to that original session in a year" comment was a bit telling about his waning excitement. He clearly seemed like the one who wanted to keep the momentum going from the first session. "I'll just go make new music with RNDM."
But, who knows, maybe that original session was too much of that logical extension nonsense and the long breather they took moved them away from that sound. Thus, BoB's seeming ambivalence.
All mindless speculation, of course.
In 2011, then i think he got kinda pissed shit was taking so long and then standard its cool we're taking out time answers."The first handful of songs we had are a great, great start. It's been really important for us that in the middle of all this, we got together and recorded a bunch of songs".
In feb. 2013 Though they hadn't heard ed's stuff yet so...But then we have an additional 15 ready to go aside from any that Eddie brings in, so we'll weed through those. I would say as a cliché answer it's kind of a logical extension of what Backspacer was, but I think there's a little bit more experimental stuff going on
Mike McCready, Sept 2011: It’s in such an infantile stage that it’s hard to say. Right now it’s a logical extension of Backspacer. There may be a few more dark songs, and a few longer songs. It might not be as poppy.harmless wrote:I'm hoping it's this.EJ wrote:Jeff seemed initially excited a few years ago. Then, the more recently the "I haven't listened to that original session in a year" comment was a bit telling about his waning excitement. He clearly seemed like the one who wanted to keep the momentum going from the first session. "I'll just go make new music with RNDM."
But, who knows, maybe that original session was too much of that logical extension nonsense and the long breather they took moved them away from that sound. Thus, BoB's seeming ambivalence.
All mindless speculation, of course.
PJ, IF YOU'RE READING THIS, THROW US ANOTHER TRACK PLEASE.
I'm ready for the Verizon clips.
My hope is that the Floyd song(s) realize SOS as well as MYM did Ole/Got Some/Supersonic.harmless wrote:Maybe The End is a better comparison with FD, except for the suspicions that Brendan O'Brien has put piano all over FD. Another thought, though, is that it's possible any weird instrumental choices made on FD will make a bit more sense on an album with more Pink Floyd-style material. I mean, a lot of the time I like Pink Floyd songs but wonder what they were doing with their instrumentation and arrangement. It's a bit weird for me. But if PJ are going to push that further in the next album, at least FD won't stick out like a sore thumb, like SOS did. Other songs were so conventional it seemed too weird.
So you could see FD become a weird arrangement and not just straight forward melody/acoustic?ItsOkay wrote:My hope is that the Floyd song(s) realize SOS as well as MYM did Ole/Got Some/Supersonic.harmless wrote:Maybe The End is a better comparison with FD, except for the suspicions that Brendan O'Brien has put piano all over FD. Another thought, though, is that it's possible any weird instrumental choices made on FD will make a bit more sense on an album with more Pink Floyd-style material. I mean, a lot of the time I like Pink Floyd songs but wonder what they were doing with their instrumentation and arrangement. It's a bit weird for me. But if PJ are going to push that further in the next album, at least FD won't stick out like a sore thumb, like SOS did. Other songs were so conventional it seemed too weird.
True with SOS arrangement, but SOS stuck out like a sore thumb because lasers were shooting out of its... I'd take BO'B piano over lasers I think (now I feel dirty).
Has it come to this, that we have to make these choices now?ItsOkay wrote:My hope is that the Floyd song(s) realize SOS as well as MYM did Ole/Got Some/Supersonic.harmless wrote:Maybe The End is a better comparison with FD, except for the suspicions that Brendan O'Brien has put piano all over FD. Another thought, though, is that it's possible any weird instrumental choices made on FD will make a bit more sense on an album with more Pink Floyd-style material. I mean, a lot of the time I like Pink Floyd songs but wonder what they were doing with their instrumentation and arrangement. It's a bit weird for me. But if PJ are going to push that further in the next album, at least FD won't stick out like a sore thumb, like SOS did. Other songs were so conventional it seemed too weird.
True with SOS arrangement, but SOS stuck out like a sore thumb because lasers were shooting out of its... I'd take BO'B piano over lasers I think (now I feel dirty).
Not sure if it was him, but real piano can work. When it sounds like the Casio keyboard I played with as a kid I just can't take it. What other songs have the real piano on them? (not Boom's organ)harmless wrote:Has it come to this, that we have to make these choices now?ItsOkay wrote:My hope is that the Floyd song(s) realize SOS as well as MYM did Ole/Got Some/Supersonic.harmless wrote:Maybe The End is a better comparison with FD, except for the suspicions that Brendan O'Brien has put piano all over FD. Another thought, though, is that it's possible any weird instrumental choices made on FD will make a bit more sense on an album with more Pink Floyd-style material. I mean, a lot of the time I like Pink Floyd songs but wonder what they were doing with their instrumentation and arrangement. It's a bit weird for me. But if PJ are going to push that further in the next album, at least FD won't stick out like a sore thumb, like SOS did. Other songs were so conventional it seemed too weird.
True with SOS arrangement, but SOS stuck out like a sore thumb because lasers were shooting out of its... I'd take BO'B piano over lasers I think (now I feel dirty).No, I agree. I mean, I don't want electric piano. But real piano? Why not. I hope it's more like the piano on that 'Love Reign Over Me' version they recorded (which was also played by Brendan, wasn't it?).
I just remember that O'Brien played that one, I think, and it was a really well played grand piano sound. The other one that's memorable was Boom's piano on Inside Job, which was one of the best things about that song imo. With better lyrics it could've turned into a Pink Floyd-esque song.ItsOkay wrote:Not sure if it was him, but real piano can work. When it sounds like the Casio keyboard I played with as a kid I just can't take it. What other songs have the real piano on them? (not Boom's organ)harmless wrote:Has it come to this, that we have to make these choices now?ItsOkay wrote:My hope is that the Floyd song(s) realize SOS as well as MYM did Ole/Got Some/Supersonic.harmless wrote:Maybe The End is a better comparison with FD, except for the suspicions that Brendan O'Brien has put piano all over FD. Another thought, though, is that it's possible any weird instrumental choices made on FD will make a bit more sense on an album with more Pink Floyd-style material. I mean, a lot of the time I like Pink Floyd songs but wonder what they were doing with their instrumentation and arrangement. It's a bit weird for me. But if PJ are going to push that further in the next album, at least FD won't stick out like a sore thumb, like SOS did. Other songs were so conventional it seemed too weird.
True with SOS arrangement, but SOS stuck out like a sore thumb because lasers were shooting out of its... I'd take BO'B piano over lasers I think (now I feel dirty).No, I agree. I mean, I don't want electric piano. But real piano? Why not. I hope it's more like the piano on that 'Love Reign Over Me' version they recorded (which was also played by Brendan, wasn't it?).