Page 247 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 4:24 pm
by Simple Torture
numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:The Orioles are one of the worst "guardians of the game" teams.
I hadn't really noticed that about them until recently. The whole yelling at Bautista for trying to throw Young out at first thing was amazing: trying really hard to get someone out is, apparently, "disrespectful".

Some players and teams just love the unwritten rules of the game because they're so easy to make up as you go along.
They threw at Sandoval over the weekend because he broke up a double play at 2nd.
I was at that game, and no one's really mentioning: Sandoval tried to bunt into the shift earlier in the game (it went foul), and the next pitch was right up at his chin. The ump didn't warn the benches, but I feel like he probably had that in the back of his mind when he tossed Jimenez.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 5:16 pm
by numbers
Yeah, so basically if you do anything other than what the Orioles want you to do, you are violating one of their unwritten rules.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 5:22 pm
by Simple Torture
Who's pitching Friday, Porcello? I hope he drills the first guy in the ass (to paraphrase #45).

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 5:32 pm
by numbers
Yeah, I think it's Porcello.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 6:03 pm
by philpritchard
numbers wrote:Yeah, so basically if you do anything other than what the Orioles want you to do, you are violating one of their unwritten rules.
Basically. The anti-bunting thing is probably the dumbest unwritten rule to ever be used in professional sports.

"So we're gonna use a defensive strategy and put all our fielders on this side of the field over here, but if you try to counter that with a strategy of your own by intentionally putting the ball where our fielders aren't located, then FUCK YOU!"

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 6:10 pm
by Norah
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:Yeah, so basically if you do anything other than what the Orioles want you to do, you are violating one of their unwritten rules.
Basically. The anti-bunting thing is probably the dumbest unwritten rule to ever be used in professional sports.

"So we're gonna use a defensive strategy and put all our fielders on this side of the field over here, but if you try to counter that with a strategy of your own by intentionally putting the ball where our fielders aren't located, then FUCK YOU!"
The worst.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 6:36 pm
by numbers
I understand when people get pissed about bunting in the late innings of a no-hitter, but getting angry about bunting away from the shift is absurd, stop shifting if you dont like it.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 6:37 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:I understand when people get pissed about bunting in the late innings of a no-hitter, but getting angry about bunting away from the shift is absurd, stop shifting if you dont like it.
Even that I have a problem with. Clearly swinging the bat isn't working, so why shouldn't they try something else to win the game?

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 6:42 pm
by philpritchard
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:I understand when people get pissed about bunting in the late innings of a no-hitter, but getting angry about bunting away from the shift is absurd, stop shifting if you dont like it.
Even that I have a problem with. Clearly swinging the bat isn't working, so why shouldn't they try something else to win the game?
Exactly. You shouldn't stop trying just because someone else is close to a no-hitter.

To me, this isn't all that different from saying batters should swing at ball four in the late innings of a perfect game.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 7:22 pm
by numbers
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:I understand when people get pissed about bunting in the late innings of a no-hitter, but getting angry about bunting away from the shift is absurd, stop shifting if you dont like it.
Even that I have a problem with. Clearly swinging the bat isn't working, so why shouldn't they try something else to win the game?
It depends on the score, if it's a game that's in hand, I think it's bush to bunt.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 7:47 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:I understand when people get pissed about bunting in the late innings of a no-hitter, but getting angry about bunting away from the shift is absurd, stop shifting if you dont like it.
Even that I have a problem with. Clearly swinging the bat isn't working, so why shouldn't they try something else to win the game?
It depends on the score, if it's a game that's in hand, I think it's bush to bunt.
Disagree. We've all seen ridiculous 7 run come-backs in the late innings.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 7:49 pm
by numbers
Sure, but the guys got a no hitter going, making that scenario even less likely than it would normally be.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 7:50 pm
by numbers
It's kind of like not giving someone who is one hit away from a milestone a pitch to hit in a game that's in hand, which I would think is bush league also.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 7:52 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:Sure, but the guys got a no hitter going, making that scenario even less likely than it would normally be.
Maybe if you bunt for it a hit he loses his bearings and you get an inning or two of the bullpen to try and exploit.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 8:56 pm
by spike
numbers wrote:The Orioles are one of the worst "guardians of the game" teams.
must be a bird mascot thing

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 9:04 pm
by philpritchard
spike wrote:
numbers wrote:The Orioles are one of the worst "guardians of the game" teams.
must be a bird mascot thing
I feel like the Jays are being unfairly stereotyped here.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 9:08 pm
by numbers
philpritchard wrote:
spike wrote:
numbers wrote:The Orioles are one of the worst "guardians of the game" teams.
must be a bird mascot thing
I feel like the Jays are being unfairly stereotyped here.
I've never gotten this from the Jays. The biggest ones I notice are Baltimore, the Cardinals, and Tampa. The Braves were a few a years ago, but they've had so much turnover the last few years I don't know if it's the same.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 9:19 pm
by spike
philpritchard wrote:
spike wrote:
numbers wrote:The Orioles are one of the worst "guardians of the game" teams.
must be a bird mascot thing
I feel like the Jays are being unfairly stereotyped here.
canada doesn't count; didn't know mlb still had a team up there actually.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 9:53 pm
by Fuck You Jobu
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:Sure, but the guys got a no hitter going, making that scenario even less likely than it would normally be.
Maybe if you bunt for it a hit he loses his bearings and you get an inning or two of the bullpen to try and exploit.
Exactly.

And how much of an accomplishment is it anyways if the other team isn't trying its absolute best? Like trying a new strategy like bunting?

"I'd like to perhaps try and win this game, increase my stats, and be a genuine competitor using a skill I'm adept at, but I can't because the other team is whining it's not fair to them because their overpowering pitcher is doing 'too well'." I honestly don't understand that argument.

Re: MLB

Posted: Wed April 22, 2015 10:03 pm
by numbers
The argument, put a different way, is "Let me try and get a cheap bunt hit in a situation that I'd never normally bunt in because I want to stop this guy from getting a no hitter."