Red Mosquito

wease wrote:My high school had the first female football player in the state a couple of years after I graduated. She was a kicker.

Quit responding. We have convinced tree.

McParadigm wrote:“Sports policy management” is such a societally inconsequential topic. If you think transgender involvement is best achieved by creating a separate track, like boxing weight classes, then just say so and move on. Who honestly gives a shit

Joe Rogan.

Not sure you convinced me of anything. I don't think the rules as they are make it fair competition. But it seems like we agree if the rules were correct then it would be fair. Seems difficult to achieve.

Self wrote:

McParadigm wrote:“Sports policy management” is such a societally inconsequential topic. If you think transgender involvement is best achieved by creating a separate track, like boxing weight classes, then just say so and move on. Who honestly gives a shit

Joe Rogan.

Others as well:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 856486002/


And as this is 2020 RM, I must again clearly state that I am neither endorsing nor condemning the above view, only sharing to further the discussion and bring in other perspectives.

Self wrote:

McParadigm wrote:“Sports policy management” is such a societally inconsequential topic. If you think transgender involvement is best achieved by creating a separate track, like boxing weight classes, then just say so and move on. Who honestly gives a shit

Joe Rogan.

I was talking about tree

McParadigm wrote:

Self wrote:

McParadigm wrote:“Sports policy management” is such a societally inconsequential topic. If you think transgender involvement is best achieved by creating a separate track, like boxing weight classes, then just say so and move on. Who honestly gives a shit

Joe Rogan.

I was talking about tree

So was I.

Huh? So because I'm talking about it, it's a non-issue? Could we discuss the issue and not the poster please?

tree_ wrote:Huh? So because I'm talking about it, it's a non-issue? Could we discuss the issue and not the poster please?

Sports and bathrooms. Go.

Self wrote:

tree_ wrote:Huh? So because I'm talking about it, it's a non-issue? Could we discuss the issue and not the poster please?

Sports and bathrooms. Go.

Bathroom access. There we go. That’s a decision involving law and society.

Sports management questions seem like they belong in a Sports forum.

tree_ wrote:Huh? So because I'm talking about it, it's a non-issue? Could we discuss the issue and not the poster please?

Just foe him and move on.

I didn't attack him. I just know where his leanings are informed. He hasn't been shy about sharing that.

If Tree is a victim of any kind, then whatever, everyone is a victim. The guy was given his own thread, he's been given lots of attention and replies. "The libs want to silence contrary opinions" is at least false here on RM, as tree's thread has been at the top for a month.

But you haven't been fairly addressing contrary arguments. I have been made an example of, persecuted, which is indeed popular with far left these days.

Persecuted

You've been engaged with and tolerated, tree. For a long time now, more than fairly. You're either trolling or the most high maintenance dude around.

If we can drop me and start talking about the topics at hand, then I will be happy. Call that high maintenance.

Sports are the least consequential thing in the entire world, and it’ll work itself out in time without ending civilization. That’s my position on that issue.

How do you feel about transgender protections in terms of something like employee rights, tree?

Imagine the state of the discourse being so fucking bad, so pudding-brained, vile, and disingenuous, that you wish r2d was here.

Have to look into it McP. Will get back to you tomorrow.