Page 26 of 48

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Mon January 12, 2015 11:10 pm
by doug rr
Green Habit wrote:
doug rr wrote:got to admit i didnt see this coming whatsoever
Only time I can think of something close was in 2006 when Martyball got fired from the Chargers after a 14-2 start, a one and done playoff appearance, and both his coordinators becoming HCs elsewhere. Maybe Elway is being proactive and wants to avoid part of that last part from happening.
listening to KOA radio now and they say John basically told all of the coaches that they can entertain other job offers because the new coach will be picking his own staff

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Mon January 12, 2015 11:11 pm
by Chris_H_2
Mike Shanahan's not going to want John Fox's assistants.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Mon January 12, 2015 11:23 pm
by doug rr
Green Habit wrote:
MitchCumstein wrote:
Green Habit wrote:Promote Adam Gase before the Niners or someone else nabs him? That's the only thing I can think of other than something real crazy like bringing Shanny back.
Promoting Gase was my first thought too. If they bring in a whole new staff I think that pretty much guarantees Manning retires. Interesting to see how this plays out.
It was apparently Twitter's first thought as well: Gase, Shanahan, and Kubiak are all trending.
it wont be shanahan, contrary to popular belief, he and john are not the best of buds and believe it or not it stems from a simple game of pool from many years ago

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 12:39 am
by Chris_H_2

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 1:30 am
by Green Habit
The Onion could have done it better if it said they'd miss his constant clapping. He always seems to do that even when something goes wrong for his team.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 2:05 am
by Chris_H_2
Green Habit wrote:The Onion could have done it better if it said they'd miss his constant clapping. He always seems to do that even when something goes wrong for his team.
You realize that only die-hard Bronco fans would understand that though, right?

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 5:10 pm
by Green Habit
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Green Habit wrote:The Onion could have done it better if it said they'd miss his constant clapping. He always seems to do that even when something goes wrong for his team.
You realize that only die-hard Bronco fans would understand that though, right?
And die-hard Panther fans!

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 5:12 pm
by @SkitchP
Green Habit wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Green Habit wrote:The Onion could have done it better if it said they'd miss his constant clapping. He always seems to do that even when something goes wrong for his team.
You realize that only die-hard Bronco fans would understand that though, right?
And die-hard Panther fans!

Please take your mythical beings discussion to the "The God Topic" thread in News and Debate. Thanks.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 5:15 pm
by Green Habit
@SkitchP wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Green Habit wrote:The Onion could have done it better if it said they'd miss his constant clapping. He always seems to do that even when something goes wrong for his team.
You realize that only die-hard Bronco fans would understand that though, right?
And die-hard Panther fans!
Please take your mythical beings discussion to the "The God Topic" thread in News and Debate. Thanks.
Jaguars fans are even more elusive.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 5:17 pm
by @SkitchP
Green Habit wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Green Habit wrote:The Onion could have done it better if it said they'd miss his constant clapping. He always seems to do that even when something goes wrong for his team.
You realize that only die-hard Bronco fans would understand that though, right?
And die-hard Panther fans!
Please take your mythical beings discussion to the "The God Topic" thread in News and Debate. Thanks.
Jaguars fans are even more elusive.

I blame climate change.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Tue January 13, 2015 5:19 pm
by epilogue
@SkitchP wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Green Habit wrote:The Onion could have done it better if it said they'd miss his constant clapping. He always seems to do that even when something goes wrong for his team.
You realize that only die-hard Bronco fans would understand that though, right?
And die-hard Panther fans!
Please take your mythical beings discussion to the "The God Topic" thread in News and Debate. Thanks.
Jaguars fans are even more elusive.

I blame climate change.
What a fantastic exchange.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Wed January 14, 2015 9:47 pm
by doug rr
jack del rio to the raiders..this will be an interesting off season

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Wed January 14, 2015 11:06 pm
by Self
Peyton should be the coach.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Wed January 14, 2015 11:17 pm
by surfndestroy
Self wrote:Peyton should be the coach.
Is this following the line that those who can't do teach?

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Thu January 15, 2015 12:00 am
by Self
I meant player coach, surfdestroyer.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Thu January 15, 2015 12:05 am
by surfndestroy
Self wrote:I meant player coach, surfdestroyer.
Broncos are in a tough place. They have great pieces in place and a quarterback who's good but one I just can't see them winning with. He's far too immobile come playoff time. Peyton has been a great quarterback but at his age, shouldn't the Broncs have been grooming a legitimate replacement.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Thu January 15, 2015 12:09 am
by Self
I know what you mean, but who are they gonna groom that has a shot at being better than him? Denver's best shot is if he comes back healthy enough to be even above average. Which is probable.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Thu January 15, 2015 12:43 am
by Green Habit
surfndestroy wrote:Peyton has been a great quarterback but at his age, shouldn't the Broncs have been grooming a legitimate replacement.
They gave it a shot by drafting Osweiler the immediate draft after signing Manning.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Thu January 15, 2015 5:29 pm
by surfndestroy
Green Habit wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:Peyton has been a great quarterback but at his age, shouldn't the Broncs have been grooming a legitimate replacement.
They gave it a shot by drafting Osweiler the immediate draft after signing Manning.
And then didn't give him any playing time. Thirty pass attempts in three seasons. That's not grooming, that's drafting and discarding. Over three season the Broncos had more than enough leads at the end of three quarters to have put Osweiler in but it seems Manning's pursuit of records and career achievements was more important.

Re: Denver Broncos

Posted: Thu January 15, 2015 8:22 pm
by Green Habit
surfndestroy wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:Peyton has been a great quarterback but at his age, shouldn't the Broncs have been grooming a legitimate replacement.
They gave it a shot by drafting Osweiler the immediate draft after signing Manning.
And then didn't give him any playing time. Thirty pass attempts in three seasons. That's not grooming, that's drafting and discarding. Over three season the Broncos had more than enough leads at the end of three quarters to have put Osweiler in but it seems Manning's pursuit of records and career achievements was more important.
Come on, playing time in blowouts doesn't really tell us much, because both teams are putting in other second stringers to avoid injuries. And there are plenty of examples of QBs (AJ Feeley, Kevin Kolb) who came in and looked good for a few snaps but utterly sucked as a regular starter. I'm not going to proclaim that Osweiler is the next answer or not, but there's a lot more that goes into that answer behind the scenes.