Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Fri December 30, 2016 11:05 pm
dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:What are the odds that this movie ends just minutes before Han meets Luke and Ben in Mos Eisley?
Snap!!!!
dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:What are the odds that this movie ends just minutes before Han meets Luke and Ben in Mos Eisley?
Snap!!!!
durdencommatyler wrote:Guess the cameos. Call your shot now. I got dibs on Greedo!
dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Guess the cameos. Call your shot now. I got dibs on Greedo!
I hope none. And I mean none.
Think about it. Jabba boba greedo and On and on.
They don't *have to be in it*
Why do we think they have to be in it??
Jabba makes sense. As does Greedo. Fett, not so much.dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Guess the cameos. Call your shot now. I got dibs on Greedo!
I hope none. And I mean none.
Think about it. Jabba boba greedo and On and on.
They don't *have to be in it*
Why do we think they have to be in it??
VinylGuy wrote:After watching R1, im pretty sure ill hate this one.
not because of the tone, because i despise the idea of having a spin off telling me an old story of Han. I cant find the reason of doing that.dimejinky99 wrote:VinylGuy wrote:After watching R1, im pretty sure ill hate this one.
Nah this will a totally different shift of genre.
We're being told buddy cop/western.
It won't suck with Kasdan writing and Lorde and Miller directing. And that guy who did Arrival doing the cinematography
VinylGuy wrote:not because of the tone, because i despise the idea of having a spin off telling me an old story of Han. I cant find the reason of doing that.dimejinky99 wrote:VinylGuy wrote:After watching R1, im pretty sure ill hate this one.
Nah this will a totally different shift of genre.
We're being told buddy cop/western.
It won't suck with Kasdan writing and Lorde and Miller directing. And that guy who did Arrival doing the cinematography
I mean the reason is money of course, but why do i need that story?? And the whole buddy cop thing, the cast...man, ill be fan service of the worst kind.
Ill be a memberberry for 2 and and half hour just to sell more toys.
That makes sense of course.dimejinky99 wrote:VinylGuy wrote:not because of the tone, because i despise the idea of having a spin off telling me an old story of Han. I cant find the reason of doing that.dimejinky99 wrote:VinylGuy wrote:After watching R1, im pretty sure ill hate this one.
Nah this will a totally different shift of genre.
We're being told buddy cop/western.
It won't suck with Kasdan writing and Lorde and Miller directing. And that guy who did Arrival doing the cinematography
I mean the reason is money of course, but why do i need that story?? And the whole buddy cop thing, the cast...man, ill be fan service of the worst kind.
Ill be a memberberry for 2 and and half hour just to sell more toys.
I have a theory about that.
They're givin us a han movie with a different han to ease us into a Luke standalone down the road with that guy who looks the spitting image of him what's his name...Sebastian Stan
And generally to get u ready for over actors playing roles we already know from established actors in the franchise
Strat wrote:This Kessel run better be fucking awesome though
@SkitchP wrote:Strat wrote:This Kessel run better be fucking awesome thoughCanon sources conflict on the veracity of Solo's claim of the Millennium Falcon making the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs. A New Hope: The Princess, the Scoundrel, and the Farm Boy describes the claim as a "lie" that the inexperienced Luke Skywalker is impressed with, but which the seasoned Obi-Wan Kenobi recognizes as nothing more than a boast. Return of the Jedi: Beware the Power of the Dark Side!, however, states in its narration that "Not every ship is created equal and the rebels have the ship that did the Kessel run in less than twelve parsecs."I hope they make it take 71 parsecs just to avoid anything being called "fan service"