Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Thu November 20, 2014 7:36 pm
Maleficent. Rough opening, surprisingly intriguing mid-section, and a terrible, deeply flawed ending that pretty much ruined everything I liked about it. Shame.
I wonder what the RT score is for Hudson Hawk?LoathedVermin72 wrote:You shouldn't. An overly high RT score is almost ALWAYS a bad omen.dimejinky99 wrote:I went through a spate of only downloading films that had a 90+ percentage mark on rotten tomatos..and i didnt love any of their highest rated films, so i dont trust em anymore
It has no number. It's RT score can be described thusly:E.H. Ruddock wrote:I wonder what the RT score is for Hudson Hawk?LoathedVermin72 wrote:You shouldn't. An overly high RT score is almost ALWAYS a bad omen.dimejinky99 wrote:I went through a spate of only downloading films that had a 90+ percentage mark on rotten tomatos..and i didnt love any of their highest rated films, so i dont trust em anymore

This hasn't been my experience at all, but ok.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You shouldn't. An overly high RT score is almost ALWAYS a bad omen.dimejinky99 wrote:I went through a spate of only downloading films that had a 90+ percentage mark on rotten tomatos..and i didnt love any of their highest rated films, so i dont trust em anymore
I could watch MM cry every day.Alex wrote:i've watched interstellar seven times
Kaius wrote:I could watch MM cry every day.Alex wrote:i've watched interstellar seven times
Makes sense, since we have very different views on movies. And to clarify:Orpheus wrote:This hasn't been my experience at all, but ok.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You shouldn't. An overly high RT score is almost ALWAYS a bad omen.dimejinky99 wrote:I went through a spate of only downloading films that had a 90+ percentage mark on rotten tomatos..and i didnt love any of their highest rated films, so i dont trust em anymore
The most LV post of all time.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You shouldn't. An overly high RT score is almost ALWAYS a bad omen.dimejinky99 wrote:I went through a spate of only downloading films that had a 90+ percentage mark on rotten tomatos..and i didnt love any of their highest rated films, so i dont trust em anymore
when you're thinking about an excellent RT score, you're thinking about a terrible RT score. when you think of godzilla, you also think of the opposite of godzilla.BurtReynolds wrote:The most LV post of all time.LoathedVermin72 wrote:You shouldn't. An overly high RT score is almost ALWAYS a bad omen.dimejinky99 wrote:I went through a spate of only downloading films that had a 90+ percentage mark on rotten tomatos..and i didnt love any of their highest rated films, so i dont trust em anymore

It's a masterpiece. Of course, so is L'Avventura. But Blowup is better.The Argonaut wrote:Going to a screening of Blow-Up later tonight. The only other Antonioni I've seen is L'aaventura, and it didn't send me running to go see more Antonioni. fingers crossed
Well, I'm still not about to go run to see more Antonioni. There is definitely something to it, but I wouldn't call it a masterpiece. There are similarities to Godard, but Godard is better looking, cooler, and just overall more compelling. There are similarities to Bunuel, but Bunuel is more hilarious and subversive. I don't quite see the appeal here.LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's a masterpiece. Of course, so is L'Avventura. But Blowup is better.The Argonaut wrote:Going to a screening of Blow-Up later tonight. The only other Antonioni I've seen is L'aaventura, and it didn't send me running to go see more Antonioni. fingers crossed