Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Fri January 15, 2016 10:21 pm
haha someone got me his grizzlies jersey for Christmas one year. I don't know why. I think it was a grandparent.
You mean Bill Wennington? My god show some respect manbada wrote:That was all Wellington.
Does that something usually tell you when you're drunk or confused?Monkey_Driven wrote:I am fascinated with the idea of a Spurs/Warriors Western Conference Finals. The Spurs would certainly make the Warriors work to get their usual offense. The matchups and game to game tinkering would be a delight.turned2black wrote:I don't think the Spurs will catch them. Pop will stick to his rest schedule and that'll cost them a few games. I suspect they'll lose 2 or 3 on their upcoming Rodeo Road Trip.verb_to_trust wrote:Will they finish ahead of the warriors?
A 7-game series between them is a toss-up to me. The Spurs depth and defensive pressure could really challenge the Warriors. The Spurs wear teams out with that defense. Other teams work soooooo hard to get a decent shot, that when the 4th rolls around they are dead on their feet. They are tired of setting picks that don't get anyone free, tired of beating their man only to be met with help defense, tired passing lanes being cut off and tired of no freebie 3-pointers. It's a glorious thing to watch night in and night out. Add the ball movement and Kawhi's emergence on offense and they'll be tough to beat in a 7-game series. And if Aldridge shoots a decent percentage, it's lights out.
The Warriors will not get the looks they are accustomed to getting because the Spurs are so disciplined and their depth will mean they won't be run off the floor.
Something tells me the Thunder will find a way into the WCF though.
The Spurs have had difficulties with a healthy Thunder team over the years.verb_to_trust wrote:Does that something usually tell you when you're drunk or confused?Monkey_Driven wrote:I am fascinated with the idea of a Spurs/Warriors Western Conference Finals. The Spurs would certainly make the Warriors work to get their usual offense. The matchups and game to game tinkering would be a delight.turned2black wrote:I don't think the Spurs will catch them. Pop will stick to his rest schedule and that'll cost them a few games. I suspect they'll lose 2 or 3 on their upcoming Rodeo Road Trip.verb_to_trust wrote:Will they finish ahead of the warriors?
A 7-game series between them is a toss-up to me. The Spurs depth and defensive pressure could really challenge the Warriors. The Spurs wear teams out with that defense. Other teams work soooooo hard to get a decent shot, that when the 4th rolls around they are dead on their feet. They are tired of setting picks that don't get anyone free, tired of beating their man only to be met with help defense, tired passing lanes being cut off and tired of no freebie 3-pointers. It's a glorious thing to watch night in and night out. Add the ball movement and Kawhi's emergence on offense and they'll be tough to beat in a 7-game series. And if Aldridge shoots a decent percentage, it's lights out.
The Warriors will not get the looks they are accustomed to getting because the Spurs are so disciplined and their depth will mean they won't be run off the floor.
Something tells me the Thunder will find a way into the WCF though.
But what about Billy Donovan vs Pop?!turned2black wrote:The "Spurs can't beat the Thunder" narrative is overrated. Overall, the Spurs have a winning record against the Thunder and they are 6-6 in the playoffs. That 2012 series was Kawhi's rookie year and the series largely turned on Ginobili missing a 3 late in game 5 that gave the Thunder a 3-2 lead.
verb_to_trust wrote:You mean Bill Wennington? My god show some respect manbada wrote:That was all Wellington.
Donovan > Brooksverb_to_trust wrote:But what about Billy Donovan vs Pop?!turned2black wrote:The "Spurs can't beat the Thunder" narrative is overrated. Overall, the Spurs have a winning record against the Thunder and they are 6-6 in the playoffs. That 2012 series was Kawhi's rookie year and the series largely turned on Ginobili missing a 3 late in game 5 that gave the Thunder a 3-2 lead.
I never said the Spurs couldn't beat them, I just wouldn't write a Slurs/Warriors WCF in pen quite yet.turned2black wrote:The "Spurs can't beat the Thunder" narrative is overrated. Overall, the Spurs have a winning record against the Thunder and they are 6-6 in the playoffs. That 2012 series was Kawhi's rookie year and the series largely turned on Ginobili missing a 3 late in game 5 that gave the Thunder a 3-2 lead.
No worries. I'm just hoping those three teams are healthy. I hope someone gives the Cavs a series too.turned2black wrote:Yeah, that wasn't necessarily directed at you M_D. It's just something I've seen here and other places. I think 4/5 made some references to the Spurs benefiting from OKC injuries in 2014. The Spurs won that series 4-2 and won their games by an average of something like 25 points.
Cavs are going to walk to the finals.Monkey_Driven wrote:
I hope someone gives the Cavs a series too.
yeah barring an injury to lebron or jefferson there's no way they don't make the finalsverb_to_trust wrote:Cavs are going to walk to the finals.Monkey_Driven wrote:
I hope someone gives the Cavs a series too.