Red Mosquito

Strat wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:We really could use another Star Wars thread.

It seems like a lot of work though. I hate moving posts from one thread to another.

its fine here, Ruddo.

whew

I had a tough enough time creating that poll in the Of The Girl thread

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I had a tough enough time creating that poll in the Of The Girl thread

I took care of everything. We're fine, all fine here. how are you?

cutuphalfdead wrote:We really could use another Star Wars thread.

At this point RM is more of an "old people things" broad forum than anything else, with an occasionally active Pearl Jam subforum. Might as well have a Star Wars one too.

McParadigm wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:We really could use another Star Wars thread.

At this point RM is more of an "old people things" broad forum than anything else, with an occasionally active Pearl Jam subforum. Might as well have a Star Wars one too.

Whatever, we have LV here. He keeps the balance. Is he the chosen one? Oh baby.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:you can be pro-science/anti-religion in your worldview and still want mysticism and religion in your fiction

Not sure how I feel about this, honestly. I think this would take a long conversation to really break down. But I doubt RM is the forum for such a discussion.

I'm the same way - I like the religious/mystical elements because they speak to a very real set of human longing, and because it is fiction you don't have to confront the fact that it's nothing but a longing

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:There are plenty of ways midi-chlorians could've been introduced in the prequels to make them more interesting. Maybe half of the Jedi council believes that that's where Force-attunement comes from, and the other thinks it's just a coincidence/over-thinking? (I'm basically stealing this idea from a book called The Intuitionist, which is about elevator repair.) That'd build some tension between some really flat characters (Qui-gon and Yoda, really) and help bring that idea of doubt back. But that'd take some really sharp, interesting writing, and I don't think Lucas was up for it.

I like this idea a lot.

This is what I was saying earlier. The idea in and of itself isn't terrible necessarily. It was all in the presentation. Good post, ST.

There's almost no idea in the prequels that is fundamentally terrible - it's just that almost every idea in the prequels are terribly executed

stip wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:There are plenty of ways midi-chlorians could've been introduced in the prequels to make them more interesting. Maybe half of the Jedi council believes that that's where Force-attunement comes from, and the other thinks it's just a coincidence/over-thinking? (I'm basically stealing this idea from a book called The Intuitionist, which is about elevator repair.) That'd build some tension between some really flat characters (Qui-gon and Yoda, really) and help bring that idea of doubt back. But that'd take some really sharp, interesting writing, and I don't think Lucas was up for it.

I like this idea a lot.

This is what I was saying earlier. The idea in and of itself isn't terrible necessarily. It was all in the presentation. Good post, ST.

There's almost no idea in the prequels that is fundamentally terrible - it's just that almost every idea in the prequels are terribly executed

Yerp.

You can make a good story out of giant robots that turn into cars, That doesn't make it a good idea. Midichlorians are a terrible idea, executed even worse.

BurtReynolds wrote:You can make a good story out of giant robots that turn into cars, That doesn't make it a good idea. Midichlorians are a terrible idea, executed even worse.

It is established early on that some people are more sensitive to the force than others, and not due to training - that there is something innate about certain people (or bloodlines) that makes them able to use the force. Midichlorines just gives it a name.

The name wasn't necessary (no one ever asked the question 'where did the force come from?') nor did they do anything interesting with it. The reveal was anti climactic and took away far more than it added. Maybe Lucas felt that this was necessary to give anakin his immaculate conception, but hat doesn't go anywhere intersting (and can't really, since the prophecy never makes sense). I agree 100% that the whole premise is terrible as it plays out. I can just imagine a world where more interesting things are done with it

Stip gets it.

durdencommatyler wrote:Stip gets it.

You get it!

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:Stip gets it.

You get it!

So does anyone here believe the Kylo Ren is Luke Skywalker nonsense?

I don't know. I don't really care. I don't want to think about it. I just want to watch the fucking movie. I hate the new trailer because who gives a shit? The movie is the movie. Just fucking let people watch it. There's no need to build up anything else any further at this point.

But, no. I believe Kylo Ren is an earned name, not a birth name. I believe he's someone else. And I believe Luke's role will be massive (not his screen time necessarily, but his role) and that's why he's not in the trailers much.

I think the old rumors from a year ago make more sense.

Yeah, I've been looking back at some old rumors and they now sound way more plausible. I'm trying to find like the five-part reddit thread from nearly 10 months ago to compare it to what we know now, too.

stip wrote:So does anyone here believe the Kylo Ren is Luke Skywalker nonsense?

stip wrote:So does anyone here believe the Kylo Ren is Luke Skywalker nonsense?

God I hope not

stip wrote:So does anyone here believe the Kylo Ren is Luke Skywalker nonsense?

It's not Luke. It is his former student and possibly nephew.


Ps if you're wrong and it is Luke...rm is a cold unforgiving place with a long memory.

I just need to know how many different Jedi Smaug could take in a fight