Lightning Bolt: the official album thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Lightning Bolt

5 stars
1
1%
4 stars
4
5%
3 stars
29
37%
2 stars
30
38%
1 star
14
18%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by McParadigm »

harmless wrote:
McParadigm wrote:I refuse to give up hope that this record will get shelved
This part seems likely, if not the rest.
In Through the Mordor 2014 :peace:
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9318
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Kevin Davis »

dimejinky99 wrote:
harmless wrote:Just to clarify: I love RVM (studio version), it's one of my favourite early PJ songs. But if I get it live and I check my watch during the 'jam' in the middle, it's because all of the tension has been sapped out of the song by the band's wankery, and then by the intro I'm not interested anymore. The studio version (and some earlier live versions I guess) had just enough tension and release. If these guys were virtuoso musicians and able to carry a ridiculously long jam session, it might be a different story, but they aren't, so it isn't.

Agreed. That jam can be nuclear winter in length sometimes.
Steals from the immediacy and intention of the song.
I think the jam had its in-bloom phase too--it's exactly the sort of thing the band was in the frame of mind to pull off during, say, the 2000 tour, a few moments of introverted catharsis where nothing mattered beyond the five guys onstage. But like itself the song has since 1995-6, the jam has been pretty lifeless since about 2003. It's really not about being virtuoso musicians, it's just about having the presence of mind to listen to what the other guys in the band are doing, and new-and-improved extroverted shout-it-from-the-rooftops Pearl Jam just aren't conditioned for the sort of patience and focus required for improvised music in general, let alone a passage like this that's about collective mood and texture rather than just a band supporting a soloist.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

LetMeSleep wrote:Holy shitballs. 57 days to go.
:ohyeah!:
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Kevin Davis wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
harmless wrote:Just to clarify: I love RVM (studio version), it's one of my favourite early PJ songs. But if I get it live and I check my watch during the 'jam' in the middle, it's because all of the tension has been sapped out of the song by the band's wankery, and then by the intro I'm not interested anymore. The studio version (and some earlier live versions I guess) had just enough tension and release. If these guys were virtuoso musicians and able to carry a ridiculously long jam session, it might be a different story, but they aren't, so it isn't.

Agreed. That jam can be nuclear winter in length sometimes.
Steals from the immediacy and intention of the song.
I think the jam had its in-bloom phase too--it's exactly the sort of thing the band was in the frame of mind to pull off during, say, the 2000 tour, a few moments of introverted catharsis where nothing mattered beyond the five guys onstage. But like itself the song has since 1995-6, the jam has been pretty lifeless since about 2003. It's really not about being virtuoso musicians, it's just about having the presence of mind to listen to what the other guys in the band are doing, and new-and-improved extroverted shout-it-from-the-rooftops Pearl Jam just aren't conditioned for the sort of patience and focus required for improvised music in general, let alone a passage like this that's about collective mood and texture rather than just a band supporting a soloist.
Agreed, yep. But that listening and reciprocation on stage is part of what makes a virtuoso musician, so that's a big part of what I meant. The reason jazz musicians are so great at improv is that their ears are fine-tuned to what the rest of the band is doing, so that if one of them is enjoying a part that, say, the pianist is playing, they can instantly get on and ride it. Because PJ are all about the big, singular bombasic effect now -- and not so interested in that interplay between the players -- I'm not so interested in their jams. It's like they assume that most of their fans will be happy if they just do any kind of waffling for as long as possible. And, well, there are plenty of fans that would take any kind of jam from them, no matter what it sounded like.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by verb_to_trust »

Kevin Davis wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
harmless wrote:Just to clarify: I love RVM (studio version), it's one of my favourite early PJ songs. But if I get it live and I check my watch during the 'jam' in the middle, it's because all of the tension has been sapped out of the song by the band's wankery, and then by the intro I'm not interested anymore. The studio version (and some earlier live versions I guess) had just enough tension and release. If these guys were virtuoso musicians and able to carry a ridiculously long jam session, it might be a different story, but they aren't, so it isn't.

Agreed. That jam can be nuclear winter in length sometimes.
Steals from the immediacy and intention of the song.
I think the jam had its in-bloom phase too--it's exactly the sort of thing the band was in the frame of mind to pull off during, say, the 2000 tour, a few moments of introverted catharsis where nothing mattered beyond the five guys onstage. But like itself the song has since 1995-6, the jam has been pretty lifeless since about 2003. It's really not about being virtuoso musicians, it's just about having the presence of mind to listen to what the other guys in the band are doing, and new-and-improved extroverted shout-it-from-the-rooftops Pearl Jam just aren't conditioned for the sort of patience and focus required for improvised music in general, let alone a passage like this that's about collective mood and texture rather than just a band supporting a soloist.
Yep. Good post KD
Dick/Balls
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43439
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by VinylGuy »

Cleverman wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
Lament wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Habit everything sounded best in 1998.
Breath sounded better in 1992.
Doesn't count. Different band. You're thinking of the Mookie Blaylocks....
Remember when 5H helped organize the Breath sign campaign in 98 then talked shit about other groups doing their own sign campaigns? I'm a 5H/MFC survivor. Never forget
Man that thing was great...those girls were a little bit too much intense though.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Mine »

harmless wrote:Just to clarify: I love RVM (studio version), it's one of my favourite early PJ songs. But if I get it live and I check my watch during the 'jam' in the middle, it's because all of the tension has been sapped out of the song by the band's wankery, and then by the intro I'm not interested anymore. The studio version (and some earlier live versions I guess) had just enough tension and release. If these guys were virtuoso musicians and able to carry a ridiculously long jam session, it might be a different story, but they aren't, so it isn't.
I agree. I think any jam really is out of place in RVM. I doesn't fit the song well.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Is this getting close?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Cleverman
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue July 16, 2013 8:49 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Cleverman »

VinylGuy wrote:
Cleverman wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
Lament wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Habit everything sounded best in 1998.
Breath sounded better in 1992.
Doesn't count. Different band. You're thinking of the Mookie Blaylocks....
Remember when 5H helped organize the Breath sign campaign in 98 then talked shit about other groups doing their own sign campaigns? I'm a 5H/MFC survivor. Never forget
Man that thing was great...those girls were a little bit too much intense though.
Yea, not counting the old Usenet groups, that was the first real online PJ community i participated in.
Satisfaction is the death of desire.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

harmless wrote:Is this getting close?
Its getting closer, but not fast enough though
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
harmless wrote:Is this getting close?
Its getting closer, but not fast enough though
:cry:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
ItsOkay
A Return To Form
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:59 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by ItsOkay »

So I'm excited again about the album. After listening to many new albums (to me) on a long road road trip, I realize how good Pearl Jam is, how they have a multiplicity to their sound while still being themselves. Already we have 3 very different songs from the new album. Though I may not love them all when LB comes out, at least there's variety.

My thoughts while listening:
Artic Monkeys, Whatever People Say I Am: Fun, enjoyable rock! By track 6 or 7 - "Didn't I already here this? Nope, just sounds like 1-5."
Silversun Pickups, Swoon: "wow they have a Smashing Pumpkins feel...if Simese Dream were limited to track 1 & 2."
U2 - Zooropa: "what just happened? Where am I?"

Only REM "Out of Time" had enough diversity and cohesiveness to listen through completely without skipping.

Some albums aren't great because of awful songs (see "Nightswimming" and "Everybody Hurts"). But others, like Artic Monkeys and Silversun Pickups don't have bad songs, just all the songs start to sound the same. Diversity doesn't make an album good, but a good album always has diversity.

These opinions are after only one playthrough, so the above albums might grow.

But either way I kept thinking, bring on the Liiigggtning Boooollllt!
Free Avocado!
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

ItsOkay wrote:Some albums aren't great because of awful songs (see "Nightswimming" and "Everybody Hurts").
:|
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by verb_to_trust »

harmless wrote:
ItsOkay wrote:Some albums aren't great because of awful songs (see "Nightswimming" and "Everybody Hurts").
:|
:cop:
Dick/Balls
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by verb_to_trust »

Dick/Balls
User avatar
Lounge Lizard
AnalLog
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Lounge Lizard »

I wanna hear more.
Where were those snippets again?
Image Image
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43439
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by VinylGuy »

Nightswimming is a masterpiece.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

VinylGuy wrote:Nightswimming is a masterpiece.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
ItsOkay
A Return To Form
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:59 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by ItsOkay »

If Nightswimming is a masterpiece then Just Breathe is the Mona Lisa.
Free Avocado!
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by verb_to_trust »

ItsOkay wrote:If Nightswimming is a masterpiece then Just Breathe is the Mona Lisa.
Are you deaf?
Dick/Balls
Post Reply