BurtReynolds wrote:Riot Act Ed: Republicans suck! I'm going to let everyone know!!!!
ST Ed: Republicans suck, but I need to write songs that are more mainstream so I can spread my message to the people!
Backspacer Ed: Republicans suck, and no one is listening, so I'll just write pop drivel and use the money to help defeat republicans.
Lightning Bolt Ed: Fuck it, I'm going to buy more cars.
This post deserves to be highlighted
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Fri November 29, 2013 6:24 am
by hlniv
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:23 am
by hlniv
Pendulum on NBC's Blacklist.
Grab that cash
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 4:17 pm
by southp
hlniv wrote:Pendulum on NBC's Blacklist.
Grab that cash
Ten selling 10 million CDs.
Grabbed that cash a long time ago. Just have to do it differently now.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 4:19 pm
by harmless
southp wrote:
hlniv wrote:Pendulum on NBC's Blacklist.
Grab that cash
Ten selling 10 million CDs.
Grabbed that cash a long time ago. Just have to do it differently now.
They don't *have to* do any of this stuff. I've never read an argument that's proved this to me. They're doing what they want to be doing, but some of it is far from necessary.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 4:27 pm
by Jorge
hlniv wrote:Pendulum on NBC's Blacklist.
Grab that cash
I don't care that the song appeared in the episode, but that looks like a really horrible show.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 5:01 pm
by stip
harmless wrote:
southp wrote:
hlniv wrote:Pendulum on NBC's Blacklist.
Grab that cash
Ten selling 10 million CDs.
Grabbed that cash a long time ago. Just have to do it differently now.
They don't *have to* do any of this stuff. I've never read an argument that's proved this to me. They're doing what they want to be doing, but some of it is far from necessary.
how many tens of thousands of people just heard that song who wouldn't have heard it before. I've read quite a few interviews with artists who talk about how this kind of song placement is one of the more effective mechanisms available right now for introducing people to your work.
Of course real artists don't actually want people listening to their music. It undermines the purity of the composition.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 5:03 pm
by stip
I wonder if pearl jam is actively seeking this stuff out or if people come to them (or both). we are probably at the point where people who grew up listening to them are the ones making these sorts of decisions.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 5:07 pm
by EJ
stip wrote:I wonder if pearl jam is actively seeking this stuff out or if people come to them (or both). we are probably at the point where people who grew up listening to them are the ones making these sorts of decisions.
I'm sure the shows are reaching out to them, and its been happening since Ten. They just softened their stance on these things over time. I don't think they'll ever allow their music to be used in product commercials though.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 5:21 pm
by harmless
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
southp wrote:
hlniv wrote:Pendulum on NBC's Blacklist.
Grab that cash
Ten selling 10 million CDs.
Grabbed that cash a long time ago. Just have to do it differently now.
They don't *have to* do any of this stuff. I've never read an argument that's proved this to me. They're doing what they want to be doing, but some of it is far from necessary.
how many tens of thousands of people just heard that song who wouldn't have heard it before. I've read quite a few interviews with artists who talk about how this kind of song placement is one of the more effective mechanisms available right now for introducing people to your work.
Of course real artists don't actually want people listening to their music. It undermines the purity of the composition.
Let's be honest, there wasn't a million different things this response could have said, was there?
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 5:29 pm
by ilpazzo
EJ wrote:
stip wrote:I wonder if pearl jam is actively seeking this stuff out or if people come to them (or both). we are probably at the point where people who grew up listening to them are the ones making these sorts of decisions.
I'm sure the shows are reaching out to them, and its been happening since Ten. They just softened their stance on these things over time. I don't think they'll ever allow their music to be used in product commercials though.
I remember at the '03 show in San Diego, Eddie claimed that they were offered a large sum of money by Viagra to use their song in a commercial.
It was to have a penis running around singing the chorus. "So we refused millions of dollars so our song wouldn't be sung by a giant cock"
... If ANY of this is true, this is probably one of their business decisions I disagree the most with. I think that commercial would be fantastic.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 5:48 pm
by MattA75
EJ wrote:
stip wrote:I wonder if pearl jam is actively seeking this stuff out or if people come to them (or both). we are probably at the point where people who grew up listening to them are the ones making these sorts of decisions.
I'm sure the shows are reaching out to them, and its been happening since Ten. They just softened their stance on these things over time. I don't think they'll ever allow their music to be used in product commercials though.
they will eventually...if Uncle Pete did it, it must be ok
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:25 pm
by IlluminEddie
EJ wrote:
stip wrote:I wonder if pearl jam is actively seeking this stuff out or if people come to them (or both). we are probably at the point where people who grew up listening to them are the ones making these sorts of decisions.
I'm sure the shows are reaching out to them, and its been happening since Ten. They just softened their stance on these things over time. I don't think they'll ever allow their music to be used in product commercials though.
Umm...
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:27 pm
by IlluminEddie
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:28 pm
by EJ
heh, fair enough, that's one. It does endorse Target, even though its really a commercial for their album. I was thinking more along the lines of a specific product.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:32 pm
by tommymtcom
theplatypus wrote:
hlniv wrote:Pendulum on NBC's Blacklist.
Grab that cash
I don't care that the song appeared in the episode, but that looks like a really horrible show.
Network Dramas are almost universally shit. Cable is where the good TV is made.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:33 pm
by harmless
EJ wrote: heh, fair enough, that's one. It does endorse Target, even though its really a commercial for their album. I was thinking more along the lines of a specific product.
The specific product is Target. I think it's getting to the point where some people will never stop saying "They will never...", because the goalposts are so easy to move.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:40 pm
by IlluminEddie
EJ wrote: heh, fair enough, that's one. It does endorse Target, even though its really a commercial for their album. I was thinking more along the lines of a specific product.
Check out the first comment on the YouTube video. It says...
"Turn off those lights! this is not a tv studio" lol!
It is really lol-able that quote came from the same guy in the Target commercial.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 6:43 pm
by EJ
IlluminEddie wrote:
EJ wrote: heh, fair enough, that's one. It does endorse Target, even though its really a commercial for their album. I was thinking more along the lines of a specific product.
Check out the first comment on the YouTube video. It says...
"Turn off those lights! this is not a tv studio" lol!
It is really lol-able that quote came from the same guy in the Target commercial.
Yeah, that's a good one. The video's an embarrassment, no doubt.
Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
Posted: Wed December 04, 2013 7:03 pm
by stip
harmless wrote:
EJ wrote: heh, fair enough, that's one. It does endorse Target, even though its really a commercial for their album. I was thinking more along the lines of a specific product.
The specific product is Target. I think it's getting to the point where some people will never stop saying "They will never...", because the goalposts are so easy to move.
It is Target, but the commercial is a music video for the lead single off of their album that can be bought (mostly exclusively) at target. No difference between that and a Viagra commercial?
(I would be bothered a lot less these days if they did have their songs appearing in a product commercial, but that's because this stuff bothers me less now than it did 15 years ago. It would still bother me a little bit, just much less than the hue and cry that would be raised by others)