Oscars

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I’m not sure those themes are mutually exclusive from white male rage. I think that’s how a lot of those types would likely be characterized.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by bada »

I guess my feeling is if Joker was played by someone from another ethnicity or gender it would have been the same movie. His whiteness wasn't important to the story.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

bada wrote:I guess my feeling is if Joker was played by someone from another ethnicity or gender it would have been the same movie. His whiteness wasn't important to the story.
Sure, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to extrapolate from the movie to the cultural climate it was made within and many events and outlooks it parallels.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by bada »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
bada wrote:I guess my feeling is if Joker was played by someone from another ethnicity or gender it would have been the same movie. His whiteness wasn't important to the story.
Sure, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to extrapolate from the movie to the cultural climate it was made within and many events and outlooks it parallels.
Yeah you could read anything into anything and I guess if I think about it the background characters in the movie inspired by the Joker could be operating on that level even if the man himself wasn't.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

tragabigzanda wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
bada wrote:I guess my feeling is if Joker was played by someone from another ethnicity or gender it would have been the same movie. His whiteness wasn't important to the story.
Sure, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to extrapolate from the movie to the cultural climate it was made within and many events and outlooks it parallels.
Wouldn't this apply to Once Upon A Time then?
It applies to every work of art. But people are obviously free to disagree about whether it’s there or not, generally by citing evidence from the art itself.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 1:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by VinylGuy »

White Male Rage!!!! Maybe a new hashtag is coming? #oscarsallsowhitemalerage?

jesus christ.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by Farmer John »

I just saw 1917 and I would be OK with it winning Best Picture. Once Upon and Time in Hollywood would be my pick though.

Haven't seen Parasite yet.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Oscars

Post by Jorge »

I'm seeing 1917 tomorrow... we'll compare notes
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Orpheus
Future Drummer
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by Orpheus »

Joker definitely isn't subtle, but also had great acting and atmosphere and was generally a beautiful movie in terms of filmmaking, so I could forgive its one-notedness. The color palette alone was really gorgeous and made it worth watching IMO. I don't mind an unsubtle movie if it's done well, which I thought it was. And I found Phoenix just completely arresting.
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by Farmer John »

theplatypus wrote:I'm seeing 1917 tomorrow... we'll compare notes
I thought it was great. I did often find myself thinking about the technical aspects of the "one continuous shot" thing, which took me out of it a bit. It was pretty impressive though.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by VinylGuy »

Farmer John wrote:I just saw 1917 and I would be OK with it winning Best Picture. Once Upon and Time in Hollywood would be my pick though.

Haven't seen Parasite yet.
Going to see 1917 in an hour.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Oscars

Post by Jorge »

VinylGuy wrote:
Farmer John wrote:I just saw 1917 and I would be OK with it winning Best Picture. Once Upon and Time in Hollywood would be my pick though.

Haven't seen Parasite yet.
Going to see 1917 in an hour.
2x speed on VLC player?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Oscars

Post by 96583UP »

i don't watch the oscars but naturally assumed when i clicked on the thread that there would be diversity / identify references

and lo and behold the first quote on the page is 'white male rage'

and now i will leave you to feast upon each other's limbs and entrails
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by VinylGuy »

theplatypus wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
Farmer John wrote:I just saw 1917 and I would be OK with it winning Best Picture. Once Upon and Time in Hollywood would be my pick though.

Haven't seen Parasite yet.
Going to see 1917 in an hour.
2x speed on VLC player?
Nope im in quito shooting a commercial. Just saw it; yeah i like it. Some glorious moments mixed with some obvious ones.

Best movie? Mm doubt it.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Dev
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7507
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by Dev »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Dev wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Current Best Picture ranking:

Masterpiece:
Once Upon a Time ...in Hollywood

Okay:
Marriage Story
The Irishman

Bad:
Joker
Parasite

Want to See:
Ford v Ferrari

No Interest:
Jojo Rabbit / Little Women / 1917
Parasite was good and Joker was a masterpiece.
Image
unreal
AMAB
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Oscars

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:I guess to really care about the Villaseñor bit, you'd have to really care about the Oscars. *shrugs*
The bit wasn’t really about the Oscars (other than the Gerwig snub), it was about wildly misreading and overgeneralizing the movies in question to a degree that’s either genuinely deranged or deliberately obtuse in order to pander to anti-art liberals.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point but what makes that skit different than any other satirical skit on SNL? Quality or goodness/badness or success aside, I'm not sure I understand how this exaggeration was so different or so much more pandering than any other.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Oscars

Post by epilogue »

Masterpiece:
Parasite
Jojo Rabbit

Great:
Little Women

Okay:
Marriage Story
Joker

Bad:
Once Upon a Time ...in Hollywood

Want to See:
1917

No Interest:
The Irishman / Ford V Ferrari
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Oscars

Post by VinylGuy »

With the talent involved in both The Irishman and Ford v Ferrari, its surprising you dont have any kind of interest on both.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Post Reply