"The Cardinals have the best run differential (plus- 95) in the Majors as well as baseball's lowest ERA (2.63) by a sizable margin. No club has posted a lower ERA through this many games since 1972, when the Orioles' staff had a mark of 2.31."
It would be nice, if at some point, some season, theyd actually have a bad year.
"The Cardinals have the best run differential (plus- 95) in the Majors as well as baseball's lowest ERA (2.63) by a sizable margin. No club has posted a lower ERA through this many games since 1972, when the Orioles' staff had a mark of 2.31."
It would be nice, if at some point, some season, theyd actually have a bad year.
I second this.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
He's over 9 fWAR the last three years, which puts him in the top 30 in the league, right around guys like Samardzija and Cueto and Latos, less than one WAR behind Bumgarner.
In a normal rotation, I think he's a solid guy to have in the 2-3 spot. Most teams don't have a bunch of guys like Scherzer and Verlander and Price and Fister to stack in front of him.
@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
He's over 9 fWAR the last three years, which puts him in the top 30 in the league, right around guys like Samardzija and Cueto and Latos, less than one WAR behind Bumgarner.
In a normal rotation, I think he's a solid guy to have in the 2-3 spot. Most teams don't have a bunch of guys like Scherzer and Verlander and Price and Fister to stack in front of him.
LOLZ
He was talking about Pawtucket's rotation in regards to him being a solid guy to have in the 2-3 spot.
@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
He's over 9 fWAR the last three years, which puts him in the top 30 in the league, right around guys like Samardzija and Cueto and Latos, less than one WAR behind Bumgarner.
In a normal rotation, I think he's a solid guy to have in the 2-3 spot. Most teams don't have a bunch of guys like Scherzer and Verlander and Price and Fister to stack in front of him.
@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
He's over 9 fWAR the last three years, which puts him in the top 30 in the league, right around guys like Samardzija and Cueto and Latos, less than one WAR behind Bumgarner.
In a normal rotation, I think he's a solid guy to have in the 2-3 spot. Most teams don't have a bunch of guys like Scherzer and Verlander and Price and Fister to stack in front of him.
LOLZ
I've never been happier to be so wrong.
Hell, i apparently overvalued him in believing he was a major league starter.
@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
He's over 9 fWAR the last three years, which puts him in the top 30 in the league, right around guys like Samardzija and Cueto and Latos, less than one WAR behind Bumgarner.
In a normal rotation, I think he's a solid guy to have in the 2-3 spot. Most teams don't have a bunch of guys like Scherzer and Verlander and Price and Fister to stack in front of him.
LOLZ
I've never been happier to be so wrong.
Hell, i apparently overvalued him in believing he was a major league starter.
He's been SO bad. The stats dont even do it justice.
@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
He's over 9 fWAR the last three years, which puts him in the top 30 in the league, right around guys like Samardzija and Cueto and Latos, less than one WAR behind Bumgarner.
In a normal rotation, I think he's a solid guy to have in the 2-3 spot. Most teams don't have a bunch of guys like Scherzer and Verlander and Price and Fister to stack in front of him.
LOLZ
I've never been happier to be so wrong.
Hell, i apparently overvalued him in believing he was a major league starter.
He's been SO bad. The stats dont even do it justice.
