Page 28 of 33
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Fri July 19, 2013 11:36 am
by @SkitchP
theplatypus wrote:Yeah. I think we disagree on a fundamental level here. No sense in prattling on about it.
I'm not sure you
get the News & Debate forum. .
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sun July 21, 2013 6:30 pm
by psychobain
i like the cover...

Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Sun July 21, 2013 6:37 pm
by warehouse
psychobain wrote:i like the cover...

so pitchfork must have ok'd it
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 1:41 am
by psychobain
you sure like to follow me around with that quote
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 1:55 am
by warehouse
psychobain wrote:you sure like to follow me around with that quote
yeah ur an easy target.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 2:04 am
by psychobain
you don't know me actually, i actually like more LP's that they give bad scores...
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 2:05 am
by Norah
All I know is I wish I had your hips, gosh.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 2:06 am
by psychobain
cutuphalfdead wrote:All I know is I wish I had your hips, gosh.
haaha...

Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 2:06 am
by Jorge
cutuphalfdead wrote:All I know is I wish I had your hips, gosh.
On you? Or
on you?
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 2:06 am
by Norah
theplatypus wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:All I know is I wish I had your hips, gosh.
On you? Or
on you?
Do I have to choose?
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 3:53 am
by psychobain
no.....
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 3:46 pm
by broken iris
psychobain wrote:i like the cover...

It's obviously done to sexualize him and sell magazines, but I don't have a big problem with that, so long as the article doesn't use his good looks try to paint him as victim (of his family, society, religion, Chicago weather, Jews, bankers, or whatever is fashionable to hate on this week) who is basically innocent except for the actions of "them".
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 6:05 pm
by psychobain
now here's a GREAT cover
if you missed it, check the pic again....
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 6:14 pm
by nyquillyn
psychobain wrote:now here's a GREAT cover
if you missed it, check the pic again....
It's obviously done to sexualize him and sell magazines.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Mon July 22, 2013 6:17 pm
by broken iris
turned2black wrote:psychobain wrote:now here's a GREAT cover
if you missed it, check the pic again....
It's obviously done to sexualize him and sell magazines.
Well it does make him look horny.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Thu July 25, 2013 2:49 am
by Mecca
psychobain wrote:i like the cover...

can't believe that they chose that shot over this one
- Spoiler: show

Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Thu July 25, 2013 3:54 am
by psychobain
i prefer this one, more terrorist/homeless feeling
- Spoiler: show

Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Tue July 30, 2013 3:47 am
by i got bugs
how irrelevant must a magazine be/how bad must a magazine be selling to put this guy on their cover??
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Fri August 02, 2013 8:40 pm
by given2trade
i got bugs wrote:how irrelevant must a magazine be/how bad must a magazine be selling to put this guy on their cover??
Welcome to a few weeks ago.
Re: Bombs in Boston
Posted: Fri August 02, 2013 9:32 pm
by nyquillyn
Sales double for Rolling Stone bomb suspect cover
After Rolling Stone sparked a public outcry for featuring the surviving Boston Marathon bombing suspect on its cover earlier this month, several major retailers vowed not to sell the controversial issue.
Apparently that didn't hurt the magazine's sales. According to Adweek, the issue with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on the cover has sold twice as many copies as an average issue.
The trade publication said more than 13,000 copies of the magazine were sold at more than 1,400 retailers from July 19 to July 29. That is more than double the magazine's average sales for the previous year, Adweek said.
Critics - including Boston Mayor Thomas Menino and Sen. John McCain -- accused the magazine of glamorizing terrorism.
A Facebook page -- Boycott Rolling Stone Magazine For Their Latest Cover - has generated more than 170,000 "likes."
Tsarnaev has pleaded not guilty to 30 federal charges including using a weapon of mass destruction to kill.
Earlier this month, Rolling Stone defended the story, saying it was part of its "longstanding commitment to serious and thoughtful coverage of the most important political and cultural issues of our day."