Red Mosquito

Anders wrote:The support for Trump is baffling to me. No matter what happens, no matter what he does, no matter what he says, people still support him.

The US is still a young nation. Preteen. It needs a myth and a ‘daddy’ in real time.
Someone to make the myth real and guide it. It just sucks that it’s that guy.

tommy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I’m honestly skeptical they’ll try to protect him. Maybe it’s naive. Seems like they want to wield their powers on behalf of the entrenched conservative system, and that’s not really Trump

God, his meltdown would be amazing

The thing is, the only states that will remove him from the ballot are blue states that wouldn't have sent electors for him anyway. He can be off of all of those ballots and still win the presidency.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah the conservative Supreme Court will surely overturn this

As they obviously should.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

tommy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I’m honestly skeptical they’ll try to protect him. Maybe it’s naive. Seems like they want to wield their powers on behalf of the entrenched conservative system, and that’s not really Trump

God, his meltdown would be amazing

The thing is, the only states that will remove him from the ballot are blue states that wouldn't have sent electors for him anyway. He can be off of all of those ballots and still win the presidency.

But this is taking him out of the primary. It could affect his ability to win his party's nomination.

B wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

tommy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I’m honestly skeptical they’ll try to protect him. Maybe it’s naive. Seems like they want to wield their powers on behalf of the entrenched conservative system, and that’s not really Trump

God, his meltdown would be amazing

The thing is, the only states that will remove him from the ballot are blue states that wouldn't have sent electors for him anyway. He can be off of all of those ballots and still win the presidency.

But this is taking him out of the primary. It could affect his ability to win his party's nomination.

Ah right. I hadn't thought about that.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

B wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

tommy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I’m honestly skeptical they’ll try to protect him. Maybe it’s naive. Seems like they want to wield their powers on behalf of the entrenched conservative system, and that’s not really Trump

God, his meltdown would be amazing

The thing is, the only states that will remove him from the ballot are blue states that wouldn't have sent electors for him anyway. He can be off of all of those ballots and still win the presidency.

But this is taking him out of the primary. It could affect his ability to win his party's nomination.

Ah right. I hadn't thought about that.

I try to think about Trump as little as possible, but sometimes he worms his way into my brain.

B wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

B wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

tommy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:I’m honestly skeptical they’ll try to protect him. Maybe it’s naive. Seems like they want to wield their powers on behalf of the entrenched conservative system, and that’s not really Trump

God, his meltdown would be amazing

The thing is, the only states that will remove him from the ballot are blue states that wouldn't have sent electors for him anyway. He can be off of all of those ballots and still win the presidency.

But this is taking him out of the primary. It could affect his ability to win his party's nomination.

Ah right. I hadn't thought about that.

I try to think about Trump as little as possible, but sometimes he worms his way into my brain.

Fair.

BurtReynolds wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah the conservative Supreme Court will surely overturn this

As they obviously should.

I agree.

Quick name the last time Colorado voted for the red candidate anyway

Bammer wrote:Quick name the last time Colorado voted for the red candidate anyway

As it was pointed out to me, this could affect his votes for the R nomination in the spring.

I still think it's pointless to try this 14th Amendment stuff on a person who has not been tried or convicted of insurrection, but the Republican "oh my vapors" responses are absurd given how hard the Republican Party has worked to get various states to subvert the last and the next election.

The rest of us are standing by going who the fuck is hunter Biden?
Coke and hookers? Grand.


Trumps kids are right there and they’ve actually had people murdered
In real time.

What the fuck?

B wrote:I still think it's pointless to try this 14th Amendment stuff on a person who has not been tried or convicted of insurrection, but the Republican "oh my vapors" responses are absurd given how hard the Republican Party has worked to get various states to subvert the last and the next election.

Rare B W

We know who is getting the falconry vote.

I mean, good. And more of this please. But I can’t see how his base will take this lying down and without getting all civil war about it

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Maine bars Trump from ballot as U.S. Supreme Court weighs state authority to block former president from elections.


https://apnews.com/article/maine-trump- ... ce=Twitter

simple schoolboy wrote:

We know who is getting the falconry vote.

holy shit this puts him in a totally different category for me wow

B wrote:I still think it's pointless to try this 14th Amendment stuff on a person who has not been tried or convicted of insurrection, but the Republican "oh my vapors" responses are absurd given how hard the Republican Party has worked to get various states to subvert the last and the next election.

definitely not pointless!

hopefully more states do this too

give this guy hell from every direction

he deserves it for giving everyone else hell from every direction

booyah

now Maine

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/28/us/m ... allot.html