Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 10:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Cool, thanks trab!
I've only been through it once, and didn't find it drastically transformed, just a few subtleties here and there. There's still some of that obnxious shrill with some of the guitars - but, I guess you can't completely polish a turd. That being said, I wasn't close to suffering a migraine after listening to this new mix.
I'll give it some more listens. I applaud the effort to try to tame this beast.
I've only been through it once, and didn't find it drastically transformed, just a few subtleties here and there. There's still some of that obnxious shrill with some of the guitars - but, I guess you can't completely polish a turd. That being said, I wasn't close to suffering a migraine after listening to this new mix.
I'll give it some more listens. I applaud the effort to try to tame this beast.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84848
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Listen on headphones. It's remarkable how much easier it is on the ears.
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Oh, I did. Its definitely easier on the ears, I think I was just expecting much more.durdencommatyler wrote:Listen on headphones. It's remarkable how much easier it is on the ears.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84848
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Gotcha.EJ wrote:Oh, I did. Its definitely easier on the ears, I think I was just expecting much more.durdencommatyler wrote:Listen on headphones. It's remarkable how much easier it is on the ears.
It sounded remarkably different to me. I mean, for as limited as this kind of thing can be. I don't feel the songs in my fillings anymore.
- hlniv
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
what is the technique behind this magical transformation?
The end of big wave into gone is actually a highlight of the album now, I used to have to tense up my brain muscles to avoid not vomiting during the intro to
Gone.
The end of big wave into gone is actually a highlight of the album now, I used to have to tense up my brain muscles to avoid not vomiting during the intro to
Gone.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Yeah, my main takeaway from listening to this "remaster" is that I just don't really like most of these songsEJ wrote:Cool, thanks trab!
I've only been through it once, and didn't find it drastically transformed, just a few subtleties here and there. There's still some of that obnxious shrill with some of the guitars - but, I guess you can't completely polish a turd. That being said, I wasn't close to suffering a migraine after listening to this new mix.
I'll give it some more listens. I applaud the effort to try to tame this beast.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- XWayne
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun January 06, 2013 2:21 pm
- Location: Paris, FR
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
I was wondering the same thing: is it possible to correct a commercial release, or has BrickwallHater managed to get the unmastered tracks? Also, is there an artefact / sound glitch at the very end of Inside Job for everyone?hlniv wrote:what is the technique behind this magical transformation?
The end of big wave into gone is actually a highlight of the album now, I used to have to tense up my brain muscles to avoid not vomiting during the intro to
Gone.
I rediscover the Avocado with this release, and it feels like the mastering had ruined the album for me, there is more depth and subtleties than just a RAWK sound stuck in the red.
- ridleybradout
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
- Location: Rand McNally
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Short answer - yes, he has corrected the commercial release to increase the dynamic range.XWayne wrote:I was wondering the same thing: is it possible to correct a commercial release, or has BrickwallHater managed to get the unmastered tracks? Also, is there an artefact / sound glitch at the very end of Inside Job for everyone?hlniv wrote:what is the technique behind this magical transformation?
The end of big wave into gone is actually a highlight of the album now, I used to have to tense up my brain muscles to avoid not vomiting during the intro to
Gone.
And yes, there is an unfortunate glitch at the end of Inside Job (and the 'hidden' instrumental bit has been removed).
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Longer answer: no. Dynamic loss is not "hidden" somewhere in a brick walled file. It's lost. You need the original audio to work with. But there are very powerful tools for mimicking it.
(patriotic choking noises)
- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
There are no tools to take the egg out of a baked cake.
I eagerly await a reissue and hope that the band do the right thing with the remaster. In fact I'd be happier with a another mixing session overall.
I eagerly await a reissue and hope that the band do the right thing with the remaster. In fact I'd be happier with a another mixing session overall.
- William Bloke
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2687
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 9:20 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Great southern land.
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Parachutes would best benefit by being left off entirely.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I think AR, WWS, and Parachutes benefit the most from this
- hlniv
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Varis wrote:Parachutes would best benefit by being left off entirely.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I think AR, WWS, and Parachutes benefit the most from this
Meaning the album would be better without it? Or that it would be perceived better without all the shitty songs around it on the same album?
Because, this has always been a highlight of the album for me...
- XWayne
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sun January 06, 2013 2:21 pm
- Location: Paris, FR
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Slightly off-topic: BrickwallHater has recently released a remaster of the Ten Remix. It can now be listened on the same level as the original issue of Ten.
Code: Select all
foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
log date: 2015-07-27 12:56:37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR Peak RMS Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR6 0.00 dB -7.87 dB 3:52 01-Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR7 0.00 dB -7.30 dB 4:53 02-Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -7.28 dB 5:41 03-Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -6.60 dB 3:19 04-Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -7.19 dB 5:39 05-Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -7.18 dB 5:17 06-Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR7 0.00 dB -8.45 dB 2:41 07-Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -6.94 dB 3:30 08-Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -7.79 dB 4:58 09-Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -7.10 dB 4:18 10-Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR6 0.00 dB -10.00 dB 8:59 11-Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of tracks: 11
Official DR value: DR6
Samplerate: 44100 Hz
Channels: 2
Bits per sample: 16
Bitrate: 862 kbps
Codec: FLAC
================================================================================
Code: Select all
foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
log date: 2015-07-27 12:57:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix (BrickwallHater Remaster)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR Peak RMS Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR12 -1.52 dB -16.05 dB 3:52 01-01 - Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12 -2.49 dB -15.17 dB 4:53 02-02 - Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12 -1.86 dB -15.43 dB 5:41 03-03 - Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13 -0.36 dB -14.28 dB 3:19 04-04 - Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13 -0.36 dB -15.26 dB 5:39 05-05 - Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13 -0.36 dB -15.02 dB 5:17 06-06 - Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR11 -3.93 dB -16.92 dB 2:41 07-07 - Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13 -0.36 dB -15.08 dB 3:30 08-08 - Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13 -0.36 dB -15.85 dB 4:58 09-09 - Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR13 -0.75 dB -15.18 dB 4:18 10-10 - Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
DR12 -2.10 dB -18.33 dB 8:59 11-11 - Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of tracks: 11
Official DR value: DR12
Samplerate: 44100 Hz
Channels: 2
Bits per sample: 16
Bitrate: 740 kbps
Codec: FLAC
================================================================================- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
I'll keep sending the frogs until you change your tune, V.Varis wrote:Parachutes would best benefit by being left off entirely.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I think AR, WWS, and Parachutes benefit the most from this
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Any discernible difference, good or bad?XWayne wrote:Slightly off-topic: BrickwallHater has recently released a remaster of the Ten Remix. It can now be listened on the same level as the original issue of Ten.
Code: Select all
foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1 log date: 2015-07-27 12:56:37 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR6 0.00 dB -7.87 dB 3:52 01-Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR7 0.00 dB -7.30 dB 4:53 02-Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -7.28 dB 5:41 03-Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -6.60 dB 3:19 04-Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -7.19 dB 5:39 05-Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -7.18 dB 5:17 06-Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR7 0.00 dB -8.45 dB 2:41 07-Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -6.94 dB 3:30 08-Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -7.79 dB 4:58 09-Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -7.10 dB 4:18 10-Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR6 0.00 dB -10.00 dB 8:59 11-Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 11 Official DR value: DR6 Samplerate: 44100 Hz Channels: 2 Bits per sample: 16 Bitrate: 862 kbps Codec: FLAC ================================================================================Code: Select all
foobar2000 1.3.8 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1 log date: 2015-07-27 12:57:15 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analyzed: Pearl Jam / Ten Remix (BrickwallHater Remaster) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR Peak RMS Duration Track -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DR12 -1.52 dB -16.05 dB 3:52 01-01 - Once (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR12 -2.49 dB -15.17 dB 4:53 02-02 - Even Flow (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR12 -1.86 dB -15.43 dB 5:41 03-03 - Alive (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR13 -0.36 dB -14.28 dB 3:19 04-04 - Why Go (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR13 -0.36 dB -15.26 dB 5:39 05-05 - Black (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR13 -0.36 dB -15.02 dB 5:17 06-06 - Jeremy (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR11 -3.93 dB -16.92 dB 2:41 07-07 - Oceans (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR13 -0.36 dB -15.08 dB 3:30 08-08 - Porch (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR13 -0.36 dB -15.85 dB 4:58 09-09 - Garden (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR13 -0.75 dB -15.18 dB 4:18 10-10 - Deep (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) DR12 -2.10 dB -18.33 dB 8:59 11-11 - Release (2008 Brendan O'Brien Mix) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of tracks: 11 Official DR value: DR12 Samplerate: 44100 Hz Channels: 2 Bits per sample: 16 Bitrate: 740 kbps Codec: FLAC ================================================================================
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Why would one "unremaster" an album that is already available in its original, unremastered form?
I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
I'm guessing it's more like he took away the "brickwall" effect from Brendan O'Brien's remix. So, you would get the benefit of the lack of reverb without all the brickwalling.Kevin Davis wrote:Why would one "unremaster" an album that is already available in its original, unremastered form?
I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
Or I could be totally wrong.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Pretty much how I feel about all this.Kevin Davis wrote:
I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
Last edited by Norah on Sat August 15, 2015 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Let's Actually Listen to the Album: Pearl Jam
Oh, gotcha -- I had missed that it was the remixed version.evenslow wrote:I'm guessing it's more like he took away the "brickwall" effect from Brendan O'Brien's remix. So, you would get the benefit of the lack of reverb without all the brickwalling.Kevin Davis wrote:Why would one "unremaster" an album that is already available in its original, unremastered form?
I admire this guy's mission statement but his work does not interest me. Just seems like the sort of thing you couldn't begin to do correctly without access to the masters.
Or I could be totally wrong.