Re: Gearhead Thread
Posted: Tue October 02, 2018 1:30 am
This is incredible. What a cool player. That whole natural wah thing he does is kind of mind blowing.wease wrote:Here’s Jack Pearson.
This is incredible. What a cool player. That whole natural wah thing he does is kind of mind blowing.wease wrote:Here’s Jack Pearson.
Yeah. I’ve met him a couple of times. SUPER nice guy. Talked with him for about 30 minutes. Just totally down to earth. Saw him sit in with the Allman Brothers (he was a member for a couple of years), Gov’t Mule and Tedeschi Trucks Band. I’ve seen him solo more than a few times at a club in Nashville. His 50th birthday party was one of the best shows I’ve ever seen. Reece Wynans played with him that night. Then afterwards, when we’re chatting with him, he asks us to go eat with him and the rest of his pals. We didn’t want to feel like intruders so we declined. Now I wish we’d have gone.Strat wrote:This is incredible. What a cool player. That whole natural wah thing he does is kind of mind blowing.wease wrote:Here’s Jack Pearson.
It wouldn't have to be a junior. HH configurations with all of the normal appointments were just Les Pauls. Juniors came with one P90, dot inlays, etc...wease wrote:A ‘61 would technically be a Les Paul Junior. It didn’t become the SG until ‘63. My dad actually has a ‘61. It’s the guitar I learned to play on.doug rr wrote:its a beginner one for my wife, not like I'm going to get her a 61 SGStrat wrote:since when has money been a concern for dougdoug rr wrote:i can get 3 of the squires for that priceStrat wrote:Just get this sweet boydoug rr wrote:maybe i'll get 2
https://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars ... loedViewCP
Thanks for the idea!Birds in Hell wrote:Yeah, stumbled on him via YouTube a few months ago.
Bluesy noodling isn't usually my thing but he's just an incredible musician.
But the body style wasn’t called the SG until ‘63. The only guitar with that body style in ‘61 was called the Les Paul Junior.Self wrote:It wouldn't have to be a junior. HH configurations with all of the normal appointments were just Les Pauls. Juniors came with one P90, dot inlays, etc...wease wrote:A ‘61 would technically be a Les Paul Junior. It didn’t become the SG until ‘63. My dad actually has a ‘61. It’s the guitar I learned to play on.doug rr wrote:its a beginner one for my wife, not like I'm going to get her a 61 SGStrat wrote:since when has money been a concern for dougdoug rr wrote:i can get 3 of the squires for that priceStrat wrote:Just get this sweet boydoug rr wrote:maybe i'll get 2
https://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars ... loedViewCP
There were 61 Les Paul “standards” with the "SG" body style.wease wrote:But the body style wasn’t called the SG until ‘63. The only guitar with that body style in ‘61 was called the Les Paul Junior.Self wrote:It wouldn't have to be a junior. HH configurations with all of the normal appointments were just Les Pauls. Juniors came with one P90, dot inlays, etc...wease wrote:A ‘61 would technically be a Les Paul Junior. It didn’t become the SG until ‘63. My dad actually has a ‘61. It’s the guitar I learned to play on.doug rr wrote:its a beginner one for my wife, not like I'm going to get her a 61 SGStrat wrote:since when has money been a concern for dougdoug rr wrote:i can get 3 of the squires for that priceStrat wrote:Just get this sweet boydoug rr wrote:maybe i'll get 2
https://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars ... loedViewCP

Interesting. I don’t think I’ve seen this before. And I’m not saying I don’t believe you. Did they have the two pickups?Self wrote:There were 61 Les Paul “standards” with the "SG" body style.wease wrote:But the body style wasn’t called the SG until ‘63. The only guitar with that body style in ‘61 was called the Les Paul Junior.Self wrote:It wouldn't have to be a junior. HH configurations with all of the normal appointments were just Les Pauls. Juniors came with one P90, dot inlays, etc...wease wrote:A ‘61 would technically be a Les Paul Junior. It didn’t become the SG until ‘63. My dad actually has a ‘61. It’s the guitar I learned to play on.doug rr wrote:its a beginner one for my wife, not like I'm going to get her a 61 SGStrat wrote:since when has money been a concern for dougdoug rr wrote:i can get 3 of the squires for that priceStrat wrote:Just get this sweet boydoug rr wrote:maybe i'll get 2
https://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars ... loedViewCP
That’s what my dad has.Self wrote:oh, don't get my tone wrong, Dougray; I'm not here to argue, I'm just a Gibson guy.
And that '61 looks nice. I need an SG in my arsenal.
here's the junior:
- Spoiler: show
Yeah, they had two PAFs. Doug posted a picture of one.wease wrote:Interesting. I don’t think I’ve seen this before. And I’m not saying I don’t believe you. Did they have the two pickups?Self wrote:There were 61 Les Paul “standards” with the "SG" body style.
The amps are quite good, but I don't have anything against the guitars, really. I have a Tele that I use once in a while. I just prefer my Les Paul to anything, to be honest. I think they get unfairly maligned as a one trick pony. The 3 way switch with separate volume and tone controls allows for a ton of versatility, in my opinion.wease wrote:I’m a Gibson guy, too. Fuck Fender. Guitars anyway. The old amps are good.
