Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Posted: Sat July 15, 2017 11:40 pm
Tzu-Wei Lin
What if he ends his career today though? If he plays 5 more years, even average years, sure, but if he retires today? I don't know. Well, and he wouldn't be eligible (MLB requires 10 seasons)philpritchard wrote:Trout is about as close as anyone.
He's one of those "absolutely insane peak" guys I mentioned earlier. Aside from roided-out Bonds, he's easily the most dominant player any of us has ever watched.MadTIGERmaN wrote:What if he ends his career today though? If he plays 5 more years, even average years, sure, but if he retires today? I don't know. Well, and he wouldn't be eligible (MLB requires 10 seasons)philpritchard wrote:Trout is about as close as anyone.
Hey! Don't forget Miggy. His numbers are insane. 9 of 14 seasons in the top 10 for MVP voting, AND, he slowly cut the strike outs down over his career. If Trout can do that, look out.philpritchard wrote:He's one of those "absolutely insane peak" guys I mentioned earlier. Aside from roided-out Bonds, he's easily the most dominant player any of us has ever watched.MadTIGERmaN wrote:What if he ends his career today though? If he plays 5 more years, even average years, sure, but if he retires today? I don't know. Well, and he wouldn't be eligible (MLB requires 10 seasons)philpritchard wrote:Trout is about as close as anyone.
Yep. Then you factor in that Trout has been an excellent defensive CF and one of the best baserunners in baseball instead of contributing no defensive value and horrible baserunning and Trout goes from historically great hitter (which Cabrera certainly was for a while) to the most dominant asterisk-free player any of us has ever seen.MadTIGERmaN wrote:Hey! Don't forget Miggy. His numbers are insane. 9 of 14 seasons in the top 10 for MVP voting, AND, he slowly cut the strike outs down over his career. If Trout can do that, look out.philpritchard wrote:He's one of those "absolutely insane peak" guys I mentioned earlier. Aside from roided-out Bonds, he's easily the most dominant player any of us has ever watched.MadTIGERmaN wrote:What if he ends his career today though? If he plays 5 more years, even average years, sure, but if he retires today? I don't know. Well, and he wouldn't be eligible (MLB requires 10 seasons)philpritchard wrote:Trout is about as close as anyone.
from a pure hitting statistic standpoint? arguing Trout vs Miggy is almost like the Aaron vs Mays debate, cant go wrong with any of those 4
https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... mi01.shtml
He certainly should be in contention. I get the feeling that John Lynch is the next Buc in line, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Will T.O. make it in before Randy Moss, who is eligible this year?
Also, what are your thoughts on Ronde Barber? He is the only player in NFL history with over 40 interceptions and 20 sacks. I'm biased because I'm a Bucs fan, but he's got the career to get in, right?
Yeah, Lynch has been on the ballot for a couple of years already, though. And while his career was awesome, I'm not sure his numbers stack up to Barber's. For that reason I see Barber getting in first. I'll have to look at their numbers again, though.Green Habit wrote:He certainly should be in contention. I get the feeling that John Lynch is the next Buc in line, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Will T.O. make it in before Randy Moss, who is eligible this year?
Also, what are your thoughts on Ronde Barber? He is the only player in NFL history with over 40 interceptions and 20 sacks. I'm biased because I'm a Bucs fan, but he's got the career to get in, right?
As for TO and Moss, I've always contended that they're Hall of Famers, but not first balloters due to their on-field/locker room issues that caused them to hop teams. I'll have to review that when we get the list of finalists or semifinalists to see if I still feel the same way about Moss.
Finally, if I may inject my own bias, I will be very pissed if the Contributors committee does not nominate Pat Bowlen next week. The longer he waits, the higher odds that he won't remember it due to Alzheimer's. He should have been nominated last year alongside Jerry Jones and going in the same time as TD, but the committee had to instead push a failed bid for Paul Tagliabue, ugh.
I whole heartily agree about Moss.jwfocker wrote:TO should be in the hall of fame.
Randy should be first ballot hall of fame no question.
Statistically, Moss is the second best wide receiver ever. He's a first ballot guy for sure.Monkey_Driven wrote:I whole heartily agree about Moss.jwfocker wrote:TO should be in the hall of fame.
Randy should be first ballot hall of fame no question.
Lynch, Polamalu, and Ed Reed have 41 combined forced fumbles. Brian Dawkins had 36 himself. 37 Ints, 26 Sacks, just missed Barbers club.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah, Lynch has been on the ballot for a couple of years already, though. And while his career was awesome, I'm not sure his numbers stack up to Barber's. For that reason I see Barber getting in first. I'll have to look at their numbers again, though.Green Habit wrote:He certainly should be in contention. I get the feeling that John Lynch is the next Buc in line, though.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Will T.O. make it in before Randy Moss, who is eligible this year?
Also, what are your thoughts on Ronde Barber? He is the only player in NFL history with over 40 interceptions and 20 sacks. I'm biased because I'm a Bucs fan, but he's got the career to get in, right?
As for TO and Moss, I've always contended that they're Hall of Famers, but not first balloters due to their on-field/locker room issues that caused them to hop teams. I'll have to review that when we get the list of finalists or semifinalists to see if I still feel the same way about Moss.
Finally, if I may inject my own bias, I will be very pissed if the Contributors committee does not nominate Pat Bowlen next week. The longer he waits, the higher odds that he won't remember it due to Alzheimer's. He should have been nominated last year alongside Jerry Jones and going in the same time as TD, but the committee had to instead push a failed bid for Paul Tagliabue, ugh.
I'm glad you've come around.@SkitchP wrote:Ive been thinking and decided Beltre is an easy yes and I was wrong for ever thinking otherwise.
Urlacher is one of the most over-rated players of the last 25-30 yearsrun2death wrote:Statistically, Moss is the second best wide receiver ever. He's a first ballot guy for sure.Monkey_Driven wrote:I whole heartily agree about Moss.jwfocker wrote:TO should be in the hall of fame.
Randy should be first ballot hall of fame no question.
TO will get in this time.
I really hope Urlacher doesn't get in on first ballot.
One of the most overrated players in NFL history.
~1,300 total tackles, just 41.5 sacks and only created 34 turnovers
I'm not saying he was bad, he was pretty good. But people talk about him like he was a fucking god.
I am no Boston fan, but when I think of baseball over the past 10 years, he's one of the first 5 names that springs to mind. He doesn't have the magic numbers for the HOF, and I'm annoyed by that obsession with numbers. I don't understand how someone can be the best rookie, be the most valuable player, be the best fielder at his position 4 times, and play a key role in capturing the ultimate prize twice, all while maintaining a career average over .300 and not get in.Simple Torture wrote:There's a small glimmer of hope from the "played hard, played the right way" camp, but not enough to push him across the finish line. I dunno what the injury is exactly, but I hope that if he needs surgery or something, he does it right away as opposed to trying rehab and trying to get back this year.