Red Mosquito

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:To be fair, Fury is about the only movie I've ever tolerated Shia in so

yeah, he was actually pretty good

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:To be fair, Fury is about the only movie I've ever tolerated Shia in so

yeah, he was actually pretty good

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I hope Chris Pratt stars in a Nolan movie

I can't decide if i liked mcgonahey's performance in Interstellar or he just looked better because of Hathaway and Chastain

Both are phenomenal actresses. So they probably made "mcgonahey" look way better. That's what great actors do.

Haha no I meant because they are awful.

And joey, I hope you aren't serious about crystal skull. A monkey could have done a better movie.

I hate to get all LoathedVermin on everyone, but yeah, I think Crystal Skull is better than Temple of Doom. I'd challenge all of you to watch all four movies in a row, in one sitting. The Temple of Doom is a terrible movie. Crystal Skull is also a terrible movie, but it's more "fun" so it gets the edge. Both ToD and CS rank far, far below Raiders and Crusade, however. Far, far below. But seriously, I'd much rather watch CS than ToD. I think people SAY they like ToD more because nostalgia. But enough time has passed. Go re-watch CS. It's better. Now, it's lows are lower, sure. But overall, it edges ToD out.

This is officially the stupidest post I've ever read

durdencommatyler wrote:What makes Crystal Skull so much worse than any other Indy film?

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:What makes Crystal Skull so much worse than any other Indy film?

LoathedVermin72 wrote:It's way too late for me to type that essay out right now

durdencommatyler wrote:What makes Crystal Skull so much worse than any other Indy film?

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Thank you, Burt.