Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Posted: Thu May 26, 2022 6:42 pm
Oops!
I guess when you say “I’ll stay away for a while” that means what, two hours?verb_to_trust wrote:Another threat to a politician? Already?JuanHamm wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:Fuckin scumbag. How does he even sleep never mind live with himself
If only crazy people would target members of Congress instead of children. Maybe something would get done.

admittedly, it's hard to not mock this opinion. the american revolution happened so long ago that comparing warfare today to that war is so far of a reach its comical. even the war in afghanistan is a terrible example to modern day america.macphisto wrote:You accuse me of arguing in bad faith, but then immediately go to mockery. Cool. You could read up on the American Revolutionary War and the War in Afghanistan for examples of how ordinary people have frustrated the most powerful militaries in the world with less sophisticated weaponry.warehouse wrote:macphisto wrote: 1. To resist a tyrannical government should it come to that, and we've seen a lot of "that will never happen" happen around the world over the past two years.
2. Self-defense
3. Hunting/competition/recreational shootingwhat world do you live on that citizens of the US are going to be able to defeat the US Armed Forces? this is just nonsense.
Yeah. I'm up for kids getting shot. Sheesh.dimejinky99 wrote:Can someone please explain the verb account to me?
Seems to be up for kids getting shot dead in their classrooms and protecting the ones that make it happen?
a friend of mine actually suggested using a hunting rifle for protection in his house b/c you don't have to be super accurate. it makes sense that it's not as light and easy to use, but it can still be effective. i'm not sure why power comes into this. does a more powerful gun protect you more? or are you talking shooting through walls?macphisto wrote:Hunting rifle, assuming you're thinking bolt-action rifle, not as maneuverable and slower. Handgun not as powerful.warehouse wrote:wouldn't a hunting rifle or hand gun be just as, if not more effective, for self defense?
False dichotomy.warehouse wrote:why on earth would anyone consider recreational shooting more important than the protection of humans? this isn't even part of the bullshit, outdated constitutional argument. its just weirdos playing with guns.
No, they were busy arresting parents attempting to save their children.Stickman wrote:So cops stood by for an hour?!?

Stickman wrote:
The police department in Sacramento, CA, held a gun buyback event on May 21 that was so popular, it had to end it early. The department offered a $50 gas gift card in exchange for any guns brought in.
The event was supposed to last 5 hours, but after only 45 minutes, the department announced that it ran out of gift cards ‘due to overwhelming response.’ It continued to accept firearms but ended the event an hour early. On Facebook, the department said 134 firearms were brought in.
Gun buybacks allow gun owners to turn in firearms to law enforcement with no questions asked. The goal of these events is to reduce gun violence in the community. Research from the Journalist’s Resource shows that buybacks might not be as effective on their own but can help if ‘they’re part of a broader effort to reduce gun violence.’
Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:But look, I don't think it's a realistic solution to confiscate guns anyway. Were it up to me, their future sale/manufacture for civilians would be banned. I'd offer a voluntary buy-back program, and if you choose to keep your weapon, it's registered and it's an opportunity for the authorities to look into someone's history to determine whether they're a danger to society by having that weapon. Because I think one thing we can all perhaps agree on is that these weapons should not be in the hands of people who only wish to harm others or are mentally unstable/ill.
Thoughts and prayers save livesspike wrote:thoughts and prayers
wease wrote:Thoughts and prayers save lives
Warehouse is obv right. It’s a silly argument in 2022, Mac. We began building a military no one can fuck with a long time ago. You can argue about insurgencies mucking things up, but I assume America tries to keep good PR. If the objective is to simply wipe out the other side, it’s probably gonna happen.warehouse wrote:admittedly, it's hard to not mock this opinion. the american revolution happened so long ago that comparing warfare today to that war is so far of a reach its comical. even the war in afghanistan is a terrible example to modern day america.macphisto wrote:You accuse me of arguing in bad faith, but then immediately go to mockery. Cool. You could read up on the American Revolutionary War and the War in Afghanistan for examples of how ordinary people have frustrated the most powerful militaries in the world with less sophisticated weaponry.warehouse wrote:macphisto wrote: 1. To resist a tyrannical government should it come to that, and we've seen a lot of "that will never happen" happen around the world over the past two years.
2. Self-defense
3. Hunting/competition/recreational shootingwhat world do you live on that citizens of the US are going to be able to defeat the US Armed Forces? this is just nonsense.