Red Mosquito

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Short Round rules you bastard!

But he's equally as absurd and much more racist than Mutt. That's all I'm trying to say. People hold Crystal Skull to some nonexistent standard. Like it's sooooooooooo far below Temple of Doom. Really they're both about the same level of entertainment/absurdity/bullshit.

They really aren't in the same league. Its not even close. The highs are higher, and the lows aren't nearly as low. I'd take Doom over Last Crusade, but both are miles better than that last one.

Kate Capshaw kinda sucks, and the raft scene is probably on par with the stupid shit in Skull, but other than that, its so much better. And all that over the top CG just doesn't fit in a Indiana Jones movie. Real bugs >>> CGI ants.

Totally agree about the CGI.

But I think time and nostalgia has made the other Indy movies so much more precious to people than they actually are. Especially Temple of Doom, which even a kid I thought was pretty terrible. And hasn't aged well, at all.

Doom is a movie of extremes. It's both the darkest and silliest Indy movie, as opposed to the rather steady tone of Raiders and Crusade. And I love that about it. I love the ominous threat and horror that looms throughout it. But I also love the goofy, absurd humor. I think they balance each other out in just the right way. It will always be my favorite Indy movie, and one of my favorite movies period. But I realized a while ago that other people tend to have a hard time embracing the kind of ridiculous humor on display in stuff like this or Roland Emmerich or Michael Bay movies.

My issue with Doom isn't the mixture of humor and what you're calling horror. The ridiculous humor is the only thing that keeps Doom watchable on repeated viewings.

Then what the hell is your problem with it?

Shitty writing. Terrible VFX. Kate Capshaw. Lack of any real sense of danger. Poor editing. Underwhelming performances. Meandering plot. Shitty writing. No dramatic tension. Cartoon villains. Trope after trope after trope. Lacks a sense of fun/adventure. Poor attempt at "horror." Wonky pacing. Shitty writing. Antidotes and poisons. Opening musical number. Unintentional racist undertones. Feels really proud of itself. Nothing is earned.

I could go on and on. But there you go.

I disagree with every single thing you just said.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Short Round rules you bastard!

But he's equally as absurd and much more racist than Mutt. That's all I'm trying to say. People hold Crystal Skull to some nonexistent standard. Like it's sooooooooooo far below Temple of Doom. Really they're both about the same level of entertainment/absurdity/bullshit.

They really aren't in the same league. Its not even close. The highs are higher, and the lows aren't nearly as low. I'd take Doom over Last Crusade, but both are miles better than that last one.

Kate Capshaw kinda sucks, and the raft scene is probably on par with the stupid shit in Skull, but other than that, its so much better. And all that over the top CG just doesn't fit in a Indiana Jones movie. Real bugs >>> CGI ants.

Totally agree about the CGI.

But I think time and nostalgia has made the other Indy movies so much more precious to people than they actually are. Especially Temple of Doom, which even a kid I thought was pretty terrible. And hasn't aged well, at all.

Doom is a movie of extremes. It's both the darkest and silliest Indy movie, as opposed to the rather steady tone of Raiders and Crusade. And I love that about it. I love the ominous threat and horror that looms throughout it. But I also love the goofy, absurd humor. I think they balance each other out in just the right way. It will always be my favorite Indy movie, and one of my favorite movies period. But I realized a while ago that other people tend to have a hard time embracing the kind of ridiculous humor on display in stuff like this or Roland Emmerich or Michael Bay movies.

My issue with Doom isn't the mixture of humor and what you're calling horror. The ridiculous humor is the only thing that keeps Doom watchable on repeated viewings.

Then what the hell is your problem with it?

Shitty writing. Terrible VFX. Kate Capshaw. Lack of any real sense of danger. Poor editing. Underwhelming performances. Meandering plot. Shitty writing. No dramatic tension. Cartoon villains. Trope after trope after trope. Lacks a sense of fun/adventure. Poor attempt at "horror." Wonky pacing. Shitty writing. Antidotes and poisons. Opening musical number. Unintentional racist undertones. Feels really proud of itself. Nothing is earned.

I could go on and on. But there you go.

I disagree with every single thing you just said.

Opinions, man. What are you gonna do? :shrug:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Short Round rules you bastard!

But he's equally as absurd and much more racist than Mutt. That's all I'm trying to say. People hold Crystal Skull to some nonexistent standard. Like it's sooooooooooo far below Temple of Doom. Really they're both about the same level of entertainment/absurdity/bullshit.

They really aren't in the same league. Its not even close. The highs are higher, and the lows aren't nearly as low. I'd take Doom over Last Crusade, but both are miles better than that last one.

Kate Capshaw kinda sucks, and the raft scene is probably on par with the stupid shit in Skull, but other than that, its so much better. And all that over the top CG just doesn't fit in a Indiana Jones movie. Real bugs >>> CGI ants.

Totally agree about the CGI.

But I think time and nostalgia has made the other Indy movies so much more precious to people than they actually are. Especially Temple of Doom, which even a kid I thought was pretty terrible. And hasn't aged well, at all.

Doom is a movie of extremes. It's both the darkest and silliest Indy movie, as opposed to the rather steady tone of Raiders and Crusade. And I love that about it. I love the ominous threat and horror that looms throughout it. But I also love the goofy, absurd humor. I think they balance each other out in just the right way. It will always be my favorite Indy movie, and one of my favorite movies period. But I realized a while ago that other people tend to have a hard time embracing the kind of ridiculous humor on display in stuff like this or Roland Emmerich or Michael Bay movies.

My issue with Doom isn't the mixture of humor and what you're calling horror. The ridiculous humor is the only thing that keeps Doom watchable on repeated viewings.

Then what the hell is your problem with it?

Shitty writing. Terrible VFX. Kate Capshaw. Lack of any real sense of danger. Poor editing. Underwhelming performances. Meandering plot. Shitty writing. No dramatic tension. Cartoon villains. Trope after trope after trope. Lacks a sense of fun/adventure. Poor attempt at "horror." Wonky pacing. Shitty writing. Antidotes and poisons. Opening musical number. Unintentional racist undertones. Feels really proud of itself. Nothing is earned.

I could go on and on. But there you go.

I disagree with every single thing you just said.

Opinions, man. What are you gonna do? :shrug:

The only solution is a fight to the death

we are at an impasse.

i almost lost friends because i didn't outright hate the crystal skull

Goin tru da planet core? Baaaaaaad bommin!

i mean, i still haven't seen the second or third indiana jones movies, and only saw the first one a week before crystal skull came out. i guess i don't really care about this franchise.

But meesa no hab a booba!

Alex wrote:i mean, i still haven't seen the second or third indiana jones movies, and only saw the first one a week before crystal skull came out. i guess i don't really care about this franchise.

I've only seen Crystal Skull

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:Short Round rules you bastard!

But he's equally as absurd and much more racist than Mutt. That's all I'm trying to say. People hold Crystal Skull to some nonexistent standard. Like it's sooooooooooo far below Temple of Doom. Really they're both about the same level of entertainment/absurdity/bullshit.

They really aren't in the same league. Its not even close. The highs are higher, and the lows aren't nearly as low. I'd take Doom over Last Crusade, but both are miles better than that last one.

Kate Capshaw kinda sucks, and the raft scene is probably on par with the stupid shit in Skull, but other than that, its so much better. And all that over the top CG just doesn't fit in a Indiana Jones movie. Real bugs >>> CGI ants.

Totally agree about the CGI.

But I think time and nostalgia has made the other Indy movies so much more precious to people than they actually are. Especially Temple of Doom, which even a kid I thought was pretty terrible. And hasn't aged well, at all.

Doom is a movie of extremes. It's both the darkest and silliest Indy movie, as opposed to the rather steady tone of Raiders and Crusade. And I love that about it. I love the ominous threat and horror that looms throughout it. But I also love the goofy, absurd humor. I think they balance each other out in just the right way. It will always be my favorite Indy movie, and one of my favorite movies period. But I realized a while ago that other people tend to have a hard time embracing the kind of ridiculous humor on display in stuff like this or Roland Emmerich or Michael Bay movies.

My issue with Doom isn't the mixture of humor and what you're calling horror. The ridiculous humor is the only thing that keeps Doom watchable on repeated viewings.

Then what the hell is your problem with it?

Shitty writing. Terrible VFX. Kate Capshaw. Lack of any real sense of danger. Poor editing. Underwhelming performances. Meandering plot. Shitty writing. No dramatic tension. Cartoon villains. Trope after trope after trope. Lacks a sense of fun/adventure. Poor attempt at "horror." Wonky pacing. Shitty writing. Antidotes and poisons. Opening musical number. Unintentional racist undertones. Feels really proud of itself. Nothing is earned.

I could go on and on. But there you go.

I disagree with every single thing you just said.

Opinions, man. What are you gonna do? :shrug:

The only solution is a fight to the death

I re-watched Magnolia last night. I was really into for about an hour. By the end, I was glad it was over. It's a fine film, but not on the level with any of his other movies.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Although I disagree wit LV about Batman Begins, I do agree TDKR is awful.

It's so bad.

I hope McP watches the last Hobbit movie soon. Because I want to see him tortured, and I want to read his review.

Good job, Burt. You just guaranteed that he won't review it.

durdencommatyler wrote:Good job, Burt. You just guaranteed that he won't review it.

He will. He must. This movie is like catnip for him.

Boyz n da hood

It's spelled that way. Don't judge me.

BurtReynolds wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:Good job, Burt. You just guaranteed that he won't review it.

He will. He must. This movie is like catnip for him.

But he never reviews when there's an expectation to review. It's too much pressure. He's too old for $#*!.

But here's hoping I'm wrong.

I'm pretty sure McP quit RM, guys.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

tommymtcom wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

tommymtcom wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

tommymtcom wrote:I think I'm going to watch all of the James Bond movies starting tonight with Dr No.

Do itttttttt

I've only ever seen two James Bond movies, Casino Royale and Skyfall. As an Englishman, I feel vaguely ashamed about that.

Those are two of the worst.

Rank the Bonds.

I'll do this once I'm actually at a computer (on my phone now).

Great:
1. Dr. No
2. Goldfinger
3. The Spy Who Loved Me
4. GoldenEye

Very Good:
5. The World is Not Enough
6. On Her Majesty's Secret Service
7. The Living Daylights

Good:
8. Moonraker
9. The Man with the Golden Gun
10. Octopussy

Mediocre:
11. Tomorrow Never Dies
12. From Russia with Love
13. Tomorrow Never Dies

Poor:
14. You Only Live Twice
15. Casino Royale

Bad:
16. Licence to Kill
17. A View to a Kill
18. Live and Let Die
19. Quantum of Solace

Terrible:
20. Die Another Day
21. Diamonds are Forever
22. For Your Eyes Only
23. Skyfall

If I counted the unofficial Never Say Never Again, it would be last.