Red Mosquito

@SkitchP wrote:

littlecomment wrote: Now if they'd also posted it to the Pit, the "prank" would've had real impact.

The problem with that is that anyone who would genuinely enjoy fucking with the pit enough to put something together, is also someone who was banned a long time ago.

Is it more difficult to make 2nd accounts over there then it is here?

wilkins wrote:Interesting how well locked down the news really is, we're less than 24 hours away and no real legitimate leaks...

maybe there is no album to leak

dprival78 wrote:

wilkins wrote:Interesting how well locked down the news really is, we're less than 24 hours away and no real legitimate leaks...

maybe there is no album to leak

Unless Ed did it all himself in pro-tools. Maximum Fixer status.

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

littlecomment wrote: Now if they'd also posted it to the Pit, the "prank" would've had real impact.

The problem with that is that anyone who would genuinely enjoy fucking with the pit enough to put something together, is also someone who was banned a long time ago.

Is it more difficult to make 2nd accounts over there then it is here?

You'd need a second membership off a different credit card and probably a different ISP.

dprival78 wrote:

wilkins wrote:Interesting how well locked down the news really is, we're less than 24 hours away and no real legitimate leaks...

maybe there is no album to leak

I mean tour dates, news, anything, not just actual leaks of songs.

I have as much interest hearing a song that ed has already done on a new album as I have interest in hearing a cover: 0%.

it's the hallmark of a band way past its prime and running on fumes.

wilkins wrote:

dprival78 wrote:

wilkins wrote:Interesting how well locked down the news really is, we're less than 24 hours away and no real legitimate leaks...

maybe there is no album to leak

I mean tour dates, news, anything, not just actual leaks of songs.

Usually don't we get rumblings from venue workers and such.

dimejinky99 wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

littlecomment wrote: Now if they'd also posted it to the Pit, the "prank" would've had real impact.

The problem with that is that anyone who would genuinely enjoy fucking with the pit enough to put something together, is also someone who was banned a long time ago.

Is it more difficult to make 2nd accounts over there then it is here?

You'd need a second membership off a different credit card and probably a different ISP.

Ah, i forgot about that

dimejinky99 wrote:C'mon. Sonci boom records? Drumgasm? Look at it. It's bogey.

Drumgasm is very real - http://pearljam.com/news/0/1/21815/weis ... rumgasm_lp

As for the typo, it wouldn't shock me if the news release was in rough draft phase and the error hadn't been caught yet. Not saying I really believe this one, but it's more credible than anything else we've seen, IMO. Kind of like winning the tallest midget contest, I know, LOL.

If that 'screengrab' had a full pj.com address we could copy out and type I could get behind it. As it stands its an elaborate fake.

Least I hope that's not the real thing

dimejinky99 wrote:If that 'screengrab' had a full pj.com address we could copy out and type I could get behind it. As it stands its an elaborate fake.

Least I hope that's not the real thing

The only part of the URL that can be seen is "3003/PJ2013". Everything else to the left is chopped off.

Using their current naming convention, it would end up being something like http://pearljam.com/news/0/1/X3003/PJ2013 once it goes live.

Since the news stories use a 5 digit identifier that goes up every time they post a new story, the full URL from that screen grab hypothetically would have been http://pearljam.com/news/0/1/23003/PJ2013.

why does everyone always ignore veevee. dude is in the know. he says it's X.

it's X.

Interesting

'To view this news entry you must be a registered member.'

dimejinky99 wrote:Interesting

'To view this news entry you must be a registered member.'

Yeah, I noticed that too. But it seems you can type anything in at the end of the URL and it all redirects to that account required page.

For instance: http://pearljam.com/news/0/1/NEW_SINGLE_ALFORD_PLEAS

evenslow wrote:why does everyone always ignore veevee. dude is in the know. he says it's X.

it's X.

I kinda think it will be X as well, but am still hoping for a double album and if that's the case i don't think it would be X

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

evenslow wrote:why does everyone always ignore veevee. dude is in the know. he says it's X.

it's X.

I kinda think it will be X as well, but am still hoping for a double album and if that's the case i don't think it would be X

Triple album.

XXX.

Problem solved.

evenslow wrote:

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:

evenslow wrote:why does everyone always ignore veevee. dude is in the know. he says it's X.

it's X.

I kinda think it will be X as well, but am still hoping for a double album and if that's the case i don't think it would be X

Triple album.

XXX.

Problem solved.

Dos
XX
Equís

Walker Bait wrote:Dos
XX
Equís

Looks like we have an interesting album on our hands!