Red Mosquito

Simple Torture wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:Well fuck, better vote for the slum lord instead.

So, planning on voting for the racist then, got it.

You are planning on voting for a racist. Can you teach us how to do it?

I already said this

Did he answer?

Lol u got me

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Simple Torture wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:Well fuck, better vote for the slum lord instead.

So, planning on voting for the racist then, got it.

You are planning on voting for a racist. Can you teach us how to do it?

I already said this

Did he answer?

Lol u got me

I feel like it's worth it to keep asking.

Mickey wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Josh is the only person here who already has experience voting for a racist. Experience matters.

I dunno man, if you've voted for enough state-level Democrats you're bound to have a racist in there somewhere.

An overt racist?

it's all lining up to make america great, again

Several U.S. states including Oklahoma reported a surge in new coronavirus infections on Wednesday, just days before a planned campaign rally for President Donald Trump in Tulsa that will rank as the nation’s largest social gathering by far in three months.

[...]

Trump’s political team, meanwhile, forged ahead with plans for a campaign rally on Saturday in Tulsa, his first such event since stay-at-home restrictions were imposed across much of the country in March to fight the coronavirus.

Trump’s campaign advisers see the event as a chance to rejuvenate his political base after a string of national and state opinion polls showed the president trailing Democratic rival Joe Biden.

Public health experts worry that assembling a crowd of 20,000 shouting, chanting people inside an arena - particularly if many aren’t wearing masks - could turn the rally into a coronavirus “super-spreader event.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-heal ... SKBN23O2T2

tragabigzanda wrote:Cook Political officially moving the MT senate race from "lean R" to "toss up."

Jumping on the tragwagon

There’s a definite chance that this election will be exactly the pulverizing event it is setting itself up to be, and also that some of the people expressing skepticism and doubt about the avalanche of evidence will be downplaying its significance as “Trump was always going to lose. That’s obvious. I don’t see that this is such a big deal.”

Not sure what it means at the ballot box, but has there ever been this many head party figures to come out against their incumbent?

definite chance this Tulsa rally becomes the American Heartland's super-spreader event

Supporters of President Donald Trump amassed outside the arena in Tulsa, Oklahoma, on Thursday, two days before he is scheduled to hold a campaign rally expected to draw at least 100,000 people.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-e ... y-n1231454

"Why are we Republicans losing support? Are we not pandering enough to the left?"

Spoiler: show

Republicans don't understand power, but Carlson does.

Someday Republican voters will finally figure out that, when you are 33% of the population, your politicians are mostly able to remain in office by not pursuing your least popular positions. It’s called politics.

If anything, the last four years have demonstrated that you get more of your agenda done by playing politics well than by stomping your foot and yelling build the wall.

Of course before this happens they’ll have to finally admit to themselves that they are 33% of the population.

McParadigm wrote:Someday Republican voters will finally figure out that, when you are 33% of the population, your politicians are mostly able to remain in office by not pursuing your least popular positions. It’s called politics.

If anything, the last four years have demonstrated that you get more of your agenda done by playing politics well than by stomping your foot and yelling build the wall.

Trump's impotent screeching on Twitter aside, the real reason they are losing support is failure to present a case or defend their own. People rightly see this as weakness and dishonesty.

Remember when I said that Trump and AOC both understand that you never apologize? If you haven't learned that lesson yet, you haven't learned how to win elections.

hm would you look at that

On Thursday, President Donald Trump's campaign began a push for more than the traditional three general election debates with former Vice President Joe Biden.

The effort, which is being led by none other than former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, amounts to the most clear evidence yet that -- despite all of his public bluster -- the President knows he is losing right now.

Remember that as recently as last December, Trump was contemplating sitting out the general election debate season entirely.

"We are not going to ride the roller coaster of the ever-changing Trump campaign position on debates, nor are we going to be distracted by his demands," Biden's deputy campaign manager, Kate Bedingfield, said in a statement.

[...]

Trump's approval rating in Gallup data took a double-digit hit in recent weeks and a slew of swing state and national polling shows him trailing Biden by significant margins.

It's absolutely no coincidence that faced with those numbers, the Trump campaign has reversed its position on debates.

Conventional political wisdom dictates that the candidate pushing for more debates is the candidate who is trailing. That person needs debates to create a moment (or moments) that can change the momentum and trajectory of the contest.

That person isn't usually the incumbent. Typically challengers push for more debates because they need a forum to land the one big punch that can change things.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/18/politics ... index.html

The effort, which is being led by none other than former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, amounts to the most clear evidence yet that -- despite all of his public bluster -- the President knows he is losing right now.

Oh come on. He is losing but even if he was winning how could he resist getting on stage against this guy?

PHATJ wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

PHATJ wrote:Fun fact:

In 1977 Joe Biden fought against integrating Black schools. He said that integrating Black students would turn schools into a “racial jungle” and saying “I don’t want my kids to grow up in a jungle, a racial jungle.”

Still planning on voting for this racist?

Good point. I better vote for the other guy because he has higher moral stan...

Got it. Racist it is.

I have no horse in this (presidential) race but I am genuinely interested in hearing from the differing opinions on the election. I'm kinda relying on the reds of RM to be able to put together a coherent argument for Trump in these current mid-pandemic mid-BLM days. Imagine my disappointment when this is what I get.

Biden for sure should have to respond to this piece of his history, just as Trump should to his. But the thing I hear so much is that it doesn't seem to matter what Biden counters with as he's obviously and unchanging racist, whilst any negative aspects raised re: Trump are all "fake news" and let's ignore and deflect deflect deflect to Biden's racism or Chyna or LAW AND ORDER or whatever.

Trump seems to have taken the political process to a new basic low - whatever you do don't argue or debate issues and facts, deflect deflect deflect with repeated regular bullshit, and yell loudly about your opponent's apparent shortcomings at all costs. He's sorta grabbed the US political process by the pussy.

It's a little sad that his staunchest RM follower essentially follows the same playbook. BIDEN BAD! BIDEN BAD! OK, I get that. But what about your boy on the same issues? Why is an obviously racist Biden position to be taken as gospel fact that this is his position now when there is no such review on Trump provided at the same time.

Come on J, give me something to understand on why Trump is the right choice for the US in 2020.

I can respect wanting to hear from both sides but after four years of this shit, it’s clear that most Americans are ready to get off this ride and as such aren’t really interested in a deep dive into every word of Joe Biden’s history. He was the previous VP for 8 years, and has been a fixture in American politics for decades. If they had shit that sticks, it was played long ago.

Despite the vocal minority, Obama left office with a high approval rate and tons of respect around the world. People take for granted how squeaky clean his administration was, during a time of vicious opposition for six years that would have loved to have a shred of anything close to the kind of shit Trump has gotten away with, and they had nothing other than Benghazi bullshit and Hillary’s emails, two things that did some damage to Clinton in 2016, but won’t touch Biden.

Trump is an utter failure on so many levels, and to be honest, most people are tired of giving the PHATJ’s of the world a platform to spew their pea-brained distortions or reality. We’ve seen and heard enough.

Trump fatigue does seem to be finally setting in with the white people who have tolerated him in the past.

That dismal showing in Oklahoma of all places was pretty telling. I’m willing to bet they make some excuse quickly to cancel the Arizona rally next week.