Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Wed August 21, 2013 1:03 am
Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
I thought about using that example, too....but you can be settled, sober, procreating, and cheerful on the outside, and still harbor something down deep that has the enemy's eyes.theplatypus wrote:Tom Waits recorded some of his best music when he was already settled down and sober.
i was taught in school that technically watermelons are berriesstip wrote:Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
Nobody likes a smart alec Lot LIzardLounge Lizard wrote:i was taught in school that technically watermelons are berriesstip wrote:Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
I always thought it was "aleck"verb_to_trust wrote:Nobody likes a smart alec Lot LIzardLounge Lizard wrote:i was taught in school that technically watermelons are berriesstip wrote:Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
It was a shot in the dark that your civilian name is "Alec". Either that, or a type o...Lounge Lizard wrote:I always thought it was "aleck"verb_to_trust wrote:Nobody likes a smart alec Lot LIzardLounge Lizard wrote:i was taught in school that technically watermelons are berriesstip wrote:Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
Still fruit thoughLounge Lizard wrote:i was taught in school that technically watermelons are berriesstip wrote:Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
He's talking about vegetable berriestheplatypus wrote:Still fruit thoughLounge Lizard wrote:i was taught in school that technically watermelons are berriesstip wrote:Both fruit, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:Thats like comparing apples and watermelons...
A different video wouldn't have made this song suck any less.harmless wrote:When I think of how something like The Fixer should have been performed, I always come to stuff like R.E.M's 'Shiny Happy People'. *THAT* kind of video treatment would have had everyone in here falling in love with The Fixer... if they'd done it well. The trouble is, we don't have Ed looking 'Shiny Happy', we have him looking intense and almost furious, which, conceptually, doesn't go with The Fixer at all. It looks fake.
It would have lessened the blow.Heathen wrote:A different video wouldn't have made this song suck any less.harmless wrote:When I think of how something like The Fixer should have been performed, I always come to stuff like R.E.M's 'Shiny Happy People'. *THAT* kind of video treatment would have had everyone in here falling in love with The Fixer... if they'd done it well. The trouble is, we don't have Ed looking 'Shiny Happy', we have him looking intense and almost furious, which, conceptually, doesn't go with The Fixer at all. It looks fake.
Nah, shit tastes like shit even when you serve it a nice plate.stupidmop wrote:It would have lessened the blow.Heathen wrote:A different video wouldn't have made this song suck any less.harmless wrote:When I think of how something like The Fixer should have been performed, I always come to stuff like R.E.M's 'Shiny Happy People'. *THAT* kind of video treatment would have had everyone in here falling in love with The Fixer... if they'd done it well. The trouble is, we don't have Ed looking 'Shiny Happy', we have him looking intense and almost furious, which, conceptually, doesn't go with The Fixer at all. It looks fake.
No, I'm saying: the song sucks regardless of the video and I'm not going to change my mind about a song based on its video. The video happens to suck as well but it's only fitting anyway.stupidmop wrote:You're saying you'd rather the already existing video is what goes down in history as marker for the backspacer era? In years to come people will look back and find this!
It's just so odd. It's like eddie's promising to fight to get it back again after the acid wears off.
Aaand I just made myself like it better. It's happy to the point of cheesy cause he's high as ballsfine.
I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek when I said that kind of video would make people love the song, though. The Fixer doesn't 'suck', the problem is that Ed's performance in the video exactly mirrors his performance on the recording. It's sincere and earnest. Michael Stipe's video performance also mirrors his recording performance, but it's all knowingly OTT and a parody in both the original recording and the video, so the video at least seems to be an extension of what the song sounds like. If The Fixer had been performed with the same sense of insincerity and satire, we would have had a video to match, and... hey presto, the song would've worked better. Ed's performance -- his headspace and attitude when he wrote it, when he recorded it, when he filmed it -- feels inappropriate. Or rather, appropriate to a Bon Jovi song. But The Fixer, as a song, didn't have to sound like Bon Jovi.Heathen wrote:A different video wouldn't have made this song suck any less.harmless wrote:When I think of how something like The Fixer should have been performed, I always come to stuff like R.E.M's 'Shiny Happy People'. *THAT* kind of video treatment would have had everyone in here falling in love with The Fixer... if they'd done it well. The trouble is, we don't have Ed looking 'Shiny Happy', we have him looking intense and almost furious, which, conceptually, doesn't go with The Fixer at all. It looks fake.