Red Mosquito

VinylGuy wrote:dont reaaaact, respooooond

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Strat wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:The left isn't blaming the housing crisis on racism.

Then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about

As always you know best

Yeah dude, don’t cross my redlining

Yea actually bi3 has a point. It's not all racism. But housing laws, loans, zoning, as a very racist past. Not really why we have skyrocketing costs but it's all a large intricate system that has brought us here today

He doesn't have a point. You have a point. There are (and always have been) racist practices in housing, you're absolutely right and my post wasn't about that. But, as usual, Bi needed to move the goal posts to score points against... checks notes... strangers on an internet Pearl Jam message board.

If pointing to the some of the system level rationale the left uses to demonstrate how racism helped cause the housing crisis is not a justified criticism of your post, what kind of reply would you have preferred? Help me respond better.

It would be totally fine and justified. You didn't do that. Nothing in "then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about" conveys what you wrote above. You want to better respond? Respond. Say what you mean. Stop trying to dunk all the time. If you have something to say, fucking say it.

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Strat wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:The left isn't blaming the housing crisis on racism.

Then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about

As always you know best

Yeah dude, don’t cross my redlining

Yea actually bi3 has a point. It's not all racism. But housing laws, loans, zoning, as a very racist past. Not really why we have skyrocketing costs but it's all a large intricate system that has brought us here today

He doesn't have a point. You have a point. There are (and always have been) racist practices in housing, you're absolutely right and my post wasn't about that. But, as usual, Bi needed to move the goal posts to score points against... checks notes... strangers on an internet Pearl Jam message board.

If pointing to the some of the system level rationale the left uses to demonstrate how racism helped cause the housing crisis is not a justified criticism of your post, what kind of reply would you have preferred? Help me respond better.

It would be totally fine and justified. You didn't do that. Nothing in "then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about" conveys what you wrote above. You want to better respond? Respond. Say what you mean. Stop trying to dunk all the time. If you have something to say, fucking say it.

OK, I respect that and will make the effort to do that with your posts. But I hope you recognize that if the baseline response is "I wasnt talking to you" or "you don't understand my post" or "I should ban you" type stuff, that runs very counter to the spirit of your request here.

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Strat wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:The left isn't blaming the housing crisis on racism.

Then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about

As always you know best

Yeah dude, don’t cross my redlining

Yea actually bi3 has a point. It's not all racism. But housing laws, loans, zoning, as a very racist past. Not really why we have skyrocketing costs but it's all a large intricate system that has brought us here today

He doesn't have a point. You have a point. There are (and always have been) racist practices in housing, you're absolutely right and my post wasn't about that. But, as usual, Bi needed to move the goal posts to score points against... checks notes... strangers on an internet Pearl Jam message board.

If pointing to the some of the system level rationale the left uses to demonstrate how racism helped cause the housing crisis is not a justified criticism of your post, what kind of reply would you have preferred? Help me respond better.

It would be totally fine and justified. You didn't do that. Nothing in "then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about" conveys what you wrote above. You want to better respond? Respond. Say what you mean. Stop trying to dunk all the time. If you have something to say, fucking say it.

OK, I respect that and will make the effort to do that with your posts. But I hope you recognize that if the baseline response is "I wasnt talking to you" or "you don't understand my post" or "I should ban you" type stuff, that runs very counter to the spirit of your request here.

When have I ever said I should ban you?

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:I should write a bot to collect all of this unhinged whining so we can look back in 60 days and laugh.

I should write a bot to collect all of your unhinged posts so RM can look back in 60 days and ban you forever.

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Strat wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:The left isn't blaming the housing crisis on racism.

Then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about

As always you know best

Yeah dude, don’t cross my redlining

Yea actually bi3 has a point. It's not all racism. But housing laws, loans, zoning, as a very racist past. Not really why we have skyrocketing costs but it's all a large intricate system that has brought us here today

He doesn't have a point. You have a point. There are (and always have been) racist practices in housing, you're absolutely right and my post wasn't about that. But, as usual, Bi needed to move the goal posts to score points against... checks notes... strangers on an internet Pearl Jam message board.

If pointing to the some of the system level rationale the left uses to demonstrate how racism helped cause the housing crisis is not a justified criticism of your post, what kind of reply would you have preferred? Help me respond better.

It would be totally fine and justified. You didn't do that. Nothing in "then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about" conveys what you wrote above. You want to better respond? Respond. Say what you mean. Stop trying to dunk all the time. If you have something to say, fucking say it.

OK, I respect that and will make the effort to do that with your posts. But I hope you recognize that if the baseline response is "I wasnt talking to you" or "you don't understand my post" or "I should ban you" type stuff, that runs very counter to the spirit of your request here.

When have I ever said I should ban you?

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 6#p2153096

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:I should write a bot to collect all of this unhinged whining so we can look back in 60 days and laugh.

I should write a bot to collect all of your unhinged posts so RM can look back in 60 days and ban you forever.

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Strat wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

epilogue wrote:The left isn't blaming the housing crisis on racism.

Then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about

As always you know best

Yeah dude, don’t cross my redlining

Yea actually bi3 has a point. It's not all racism. But housing laws, loans, zoning, as a very racist past. Not really why we have skyrocketing costs but it's all a large intricate system that has brought us here today

He doesn't have a point. You have a point. There are (and always have been) racist practices in housing, you're absolutely right and my post wasn't about that. But, as usual, Bi needed to move the goal posts to score points against... checks notes... strangers on an internet Pearl Jam message board.

If pointing to the some of the system level rationale the left uses to demonstrate how racism helped cause the housing crisis is not a justified criticism of your post, what kind of reply would you have preferred? Help me respond better.

It would be totally fine and justified. You didn't do that. Nothing in "then we can add it to the list things they are wrong about" conveys what you wrote above. You want to better respond? Respond. Say what you mean. Stop trying to dunk all the time. If you have something to say, fucking say it.

OK, I respect that and will make the effort to do that with your posts. But I hope you recognize that if the baseline response is "I wasnt talking to you" or "you don't understand my post" or "I should ban you" type stuff, that runs very counter to the spirit of your request here.

When have I ever said I should ban you?

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 6#p2153096

epilogue wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:I should write a bot to collect all of this unhinged whining so we can look back in 60 days and laugh.

I should write a bot to collect all of your unhinged posts so RM can look back in 60 days and ban you forever.

That was a perfectly acceptable response to your post!

I mean, if we can't laugh at this stuff, what are we even doing here?

dimejinky99 wrote:

He doesn’t even like us being here never mind having the temerity to respond. And to disagree with him!?

The very fuckin idea! We have some cheek!

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

He doesn’t even like us being here never mind having the temerity to respond. And to disagree with him!?

The very fuckin idea! We have some cheek!

Lol you cry every time I post in the star wars forum and beg the mods to ban us.

dimejinky99 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

He doesn’t even like us being here never mind having the temerity to respond. And to disagree with him!?

The very fuckin idea! We have some cheek!

Lol you cry every time I post in the star wars forum and beg the mods to ban us.

I’ve never actually done that. I might though.
Think your RM journey will come to an end before I have to though.

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

He doesn’t even like us being here never mind having the temerity to respond. And to disagree with him!?

The very fuckin idea! We have some cheek!

Lol you cry every time I post in the star wars forum and beg the mods to ban us.

I’ve never actually done that. I might though.
Think your RM journey will come to an end before I have to though.

Thanks to your goldfish memory, you'll be able to forget this exchange ever took place and go on thinking you aren't a massive hypocrite in about five minutes.

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

He doesn’t even like us being here never mind having the temerity to respond. And to disagree with him!?

The very fuckin idea! We have some cheek!

Lol you cry every time I post in the star wars forum and beg the mods to ban us.

I’ve never actually done that. I might though.
Think your RM journey will come to an end before I have to though.

Thanks to your goldfish memory, you'll be able to forget this exchange ever took place and go on thinking you aren't a massive hypocrite in about five minutes.

dimejinky99 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

He doesn’t even like us being here never mind having the temerity to respond. And to disagree with him!?

The very fuckin idea! We have some cheek!

Lol you cry every time I post in the star wars forum and beg the mods to ban us.

I’ve never actually done that. I might though.
Think your RM journey will come to an end before I have to though.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:

He doesn’t even like us being here never mind having the temerity to respond. And to disagree with him!?

The very fuckin idea! We have some cheek!

Lol you cry every time I post in the star wars forum and beg the mods to ban us.

I’ve never actually done that. I might though.
Think your RM journey will come to an end before I have to though.

Continuing to try to bait someone into saying something over the top to get banned will get you banned as well, dime. You two are basically joined at the hip now. So ask yourself, which is better for the rest of us, RM with burt and dime or without?