Re: MLB
Posted: Thu July 30, 2015 4:52 pm
@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
way to explain the joke, chud.
@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:@SkitchP wrote:You guys are overvaluing Porcello a bit. I like the guy, but he's a 4.
way to explain the joke, chud.
philpritchard wrote:Norris, Labourt and Boyd. I am shocked at how OK I am with this deal.
For real.cutuphalfdead wrote:I hate you both.
Whoa, really? Boyd has the potential to be very good, but Alford has to be one of the most exciting prospects in baseball right now.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:Norris, Labourt and Boyd. I am shocked at how OK I am with this deal.
Same here. Alford doesn't excite me. Im happier with Boyd.
philpritchard wrote:Whoa, really? Boyd has the potential to be very good, but Alford has to be one of the most exciting prospects in baseball right now.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:Norris, Labourt and Boyd. I am shocked at how OK I am with this deal.
Same here. Alford doesn't excite me. Im happier with Boyd.
I mean... Alford is extremely raw, with just 110 PAs before this year because of his focus on football. And this year, he had a 144 wRC+ at A-ball, then he moved up to high-A and has a 155 wRC+. That's Alford without power.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:Whoa, really? Boyd has the potential to be very good, but Alford has to be one of the most exciting prospects in baseball right now.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:Norris, Labourt and Boyd. I am shocked at how OK I am with this deal.
Same here. Alford doesn't excite me. Im happier with Boyd.
The thing with Alford is he could be very good. But there are always "If he gets some power" athletic OF prospects. Hell, you just traded one to us in the offseason. And we have our own Alford in Derek Hill.
Hill also has been hurt.philpritchard wrote:I mean... Alford is extremely raw, with just 110 PAs before this year because of his focus on football. And this year, he had a 144 wRC+ at A-ball, then he moved up to high-A and has a 155 wRC+. That's Alford without power.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:Whoa, really? Boyd has the potential to be very good, but Alford has to be one of the most exciting prospects in baseball right now.@SkitchP wrote:philpritchard wrote:Norris, Labourt and Boyd. I am shocked at how OK I am with this deal.
Same here. Alford doesn't excite me. Im happier with Boyd.
The thing with Alford is he could be very good. But there are always "If he gets some power" athletic OF prospects. Hell, you just traded one to us in the offseason. And we have our own Alford in Derek Hill.
Hill has an 88 wRC+ this year. He's a year and a half younger, but he still hasn't really had any success yet. Alford has been one of the best minor league players in baseball this year.
They actually scare me too, especially with the Jays experience with Gose and the way DJ Davis is developing. But those guys were always about "Hey, he's really athletic, so if we start seeing results on the field, he could be a star." With Alford, we are seeing results.@SkitchP wrote:Those high athleticism guys just scare me.
philpritchard wrote:They actually scare me too, especially with the Jays experience with Gose and the way DJ Davis is developing. But those guys were always about "Hey, he's really athletic, so if we start seeing results on the field, he could be a star." With Alford, we are seeing results.@SkitchP wrote:Those high athleticism guys just scare me.
Either way... whatever. The Tigers got what seems like a good return for Price. The Jays paid a price that I'm perfectly comfortable with. It's a good day.
EJ wrote:
But, its got to be exciting for the BJ fans.
The Jays are 7 back of the Yankees, but they play each other 13 more times this year.numbers wrote:The Tigers got a really good return for a rental like Price, but it's a good deal for Toronto as well. A team like them that's been out of it for so long has a chance in an AL that is wide open.
Having Price helps them immensely once the playoffs start, especially if they end up in the one game playoff(Although I think Price has pretty shitty playoff numbers.)philpritchard wrote:The Jays are 7 back of the Yankees, but they play each other 13 more times this year.numbers wrote:The Tigers got a really good return for a rental like Price, but it's a good deal for Toronto as well. A team like them that's been out of it for so long has a chance in an AL that is wide open.
The Jays big deadline moves so far: adding Tulowitzki and Price.
The Yankees big deadline moves so far: Pineda and Nova are hurt.