Or maybe it's the same character and she makes different choices or different things happen to her. A character is defined by more than banging Luke fucking Skywalker.VinylGuy wrote:Guys, i dont get it. If Mara Jade is not going to be Mara Jade. THEN ITS A DIFFERENT CHARACTER.
Why name her Mara Jade? Cant these guys come up with new characters?
Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85162
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43439
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Oh i feel the same way about Thrawn. The fact that they are doing another trilogy of books with him is just....ugh.
You discarded already a trilogy of books with him.
You discarded already a trilogy of books with him.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43439
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
I never talked about she and Luke.durdencommatyler wrote:Or maybe it's the same character and she makes different choices or different things happen to her. A character is defined by more than banging Luke fucking Skywalker.VinylGuy wrote:Guys, i dont get it. If Mara Jade is not going to be Mara Jade. THEN ITS A DIFFERENT CHARACTER.
Why name her Mara Jade? Cant these guys come up with new characters?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Anders
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 23547
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
- Location: Oslo, Norway
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
They had to discard everything, not because it was bad (there was anything from great to bad in th ext uni), but because they wanted a clean slate. Thrawn was a great idea/character, so they rebooted him. Makes perfect sense.VinylGuy wrote:Oh i feel the same way about Thrawn. The fact that they are doing another trilogy of books with him is just....ugh.
You discarded already a trilogy of books with him.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85162
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
So you have a problem with his arc in Rebels and the trilogy that already exists about him? You'd rather just not use a great character just because the events are different?VinylGuy wrote:Oh i feel the same way about Thrawn. The fact that they are doing another trilogy of books with him is just....ugh.
You discarded already a trilogy of books with him.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85162
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Anders wrote:They had to discard everything, not because it was bad (there was anything from great to bad in th ext uni), but because they wanted a clean slate. Thrawn was a great idea/character, so they rebooted him. Makes perfect sense.VinylGuy wrote:Oh i feel the same way about Thrawn. The fact that they are doing another trilogy of books with him is just....ugh.
You discarded already a trilogy of books with him.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Where do you bring her in at this point? We’re done with Luke. Don’t see how it could be done?
Many complained about Solo saying it could have been an awesome film about a new character instead of an average film made more disappointing because it was Han Solo and by that alone it should have been awesome.
If they’ve done inquisitors and thrawn etc it’s really late in the game to start telling stories about the emperors hand. People will also ask hang on, wasn’t Vader the emperors hand?
The latest thrawn book had the emperor and Tarkin and Krennic in it. That would have been the place if any.
Don’t see them ever bringing her into it. Don’t see how that they can
Many complained about Solo saying it could have been an awesome film about a new character instead of an average film made more disappointing because it was Han Solo and by that alone it should have been awesome.
If they’ve done inquisitors and thrawn etc it’s really late in the game to start telling stories about the emperors hand. People will also ask hang on, wasn’t Vader the emperors hand?
The latest thrawn book had the emperor and Tarkin and Krennic in it. That would have been the place if any.
Don’t see them ever bringing her into it. Don’t see how that they can
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85162
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Maybe... she... has.... nothing... to do... with... the Emperor?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85162
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Doesn't look much like a Knight to me.dimejinky99 wrote:
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85162
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Or just set the story somewhere in all that space between III & IV or IV & V ... or alter her character a bit and make her someone who helped start the First Order. Maybe she worked with Snoke. Maybe Snoke usurped her.durdencommatyler wrote:Maybe... she... has.... nothing... to do... with... the Emperor?
There are literally thousands of options. It doesn't have to be the way it was once upon a time, is all I'm saying.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40711
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Exactly how they did before.dimejinky99 wrote:Where do you bring her in at this point? We’re done with Luke. Don’t see how it could be done?
Many complained about Solo saying it could have been an awesome film about a new character instead of an average film made more disappointing because it was Han Solo and by that alone it should have been awesome.
If they’ve done inquisitors and thrawn etc it’s really late in the game to start telling stories about the emperors hand. People will also ask hang on, wasn’t Vader the emperors hand?
The latest thrawn book had the emperor and Tarkin and Krennic in it. That would have been the place if any.
Don’t see them ever bringing her into it. Don’t see how that they can
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Nah it won’t happen. Many give her her own comic series as the hand? That could work. Keep all things skywalker out of it though. An keep Skywalkers cock out of her too mainly.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43439
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
I still dont get why you guys want a mara jade thats not:
- The emperor´s hand
- luke girl
I mean, why call this character MARA JADE?? Even Thrawn came back as the same character they tossed out. Why make an entire new character and called her Mara Jade?
- The emperor´s hand
- luke girl
I mean, why call this character MARA JADE?? Even Thrawn came back as the same character they tossed out. Why make an entire new character and called her Mara Jade?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Fuck.
Now I’m interpreting the Rise of Skywalker a whole other way.
Now I’m interpreting the Rise of Skywalker a whole other way.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43439
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
care to explain?dimejinky99 wrote:Fuck.
Now I’m interpreting the Rise of Skywalker a whole other way.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
VinylGuy wrote:care to explain?dimejinky99 wrote:Fuck.
Now I’m interpreting the Rise of Skywalker a whole other way.
In relation to my post previous to that.
Rise of skywalker. Referring to morning wood
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43439
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85162
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
I still don't get why you have a problem understanding this.VinylGuy wrote:I still dont get why you guys want a mara jade thats not:
- The emperor´s hand
- luke girl
I mean, why call this character MARA JADE?? Even Thrawn came back as the same character they tossed out. Why make an entire new character and called her Mara Jade?
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43439
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker
Because you are changing basically the core aspects of Mara Jade.
You want a new different character with the same name.
You want a new different character with the same name.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.