Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Mon February 15, 2016 8:42 pm
Love for Wiggins?
Can you imagine?!verb_to_trust wrote:Love for Wiggins?
They should. He's a great player.verb_to_trust wrote:Clips want a ton for Blake based on that Denver offer that was rejected. He's up in 2017...
Pat Riley came out again a few days ago and said that he's getting old and wants to win now.verb_to_trust wrote:No way they give up Winslow
What moves would you do if you were Miami? I haven't really paid much attention to them this year other than few random games.4/5 wrote:Pat Riley came out again a few days ago and said that he's getting old and wants to win now.verb_to_trust wrote:No way they give up Winslow
Miami has no assets for a trade on this roster besides Winslow really, so a lot of Heat fans are worried that they might further mortgage the future so that we're a 5 seed instead of a 7 this year. Obviously I really hope they don't go this route.
Miami desperately needs shooting. Basically the lack of shooting is suffocating the offense as a whole. Its funny that the two best teams in the league instantly knew what to do against Miami: the Warriors didn't cover Winslow. They gave him whatever shot he wanted so Miami was basically playing 4 on 5. Then last week Pop took it a step further and the Spurs didn't guard the 3 point line. They had 5 guys with a foot in the paint, leaving no room for Wade/Dragic drives, no pick and rolls, no nothing. Miami has absolutely no ability to space the floor.Monkey_Driven wrote:What moves would you do if you were Miami? I haven't really paid much attention to them this year other than few random games.4/5 wrote:Pat Riley came out again a few days ago and said that he's getting old and wants to win now.verb_to_trust wrote:No way they give up Winslow
Miami has no assets for a trade on this roster besides Winslow really, so a lot of Heat fans are worried that they might further mortgage the future so that we're a 5 seed instead of a 7 this year. Obviously I really hope they don't go this route.
How many teammates has he attacked in the past 4 days?turned2black wrote:Someone take Markieff Morris! PLEASE!!!!!
why would the clippers trade griffin? because clippers?Monkey_Driven wrote:They should. He's a great player.verb_to_trust wrote:Clips want a ton for Blake based on that Denver offer that was rejected. He's up in 2017...
Bulls would love to have him. Great contract and has been ballin' since Horny left.turned2black wrote:Someone take Markieff Morris! PLEASE!!!!!
I'm not saying I would necessarily do it, but the murmurs are out there for for the following reasons.spike wrote:why would the clippers trade griffin? because clippers?Monkey_Driven wrote:They should. He's a great player.verb_to_trust wrote:Clips want a ton for Blake based on that Denver offer that was rejected. He's up in 2017...
That was a lot for Denver to give up for what could ultimately end up a year rental.Monkey_Driven wrote:They should. He's a great player.verb_to_trust wrote:Clips want a ton for Blake based on that Denver offer that was rejected. He's up in 2017...
Yeah I heard this rumor too. I'd take him since I guess the deal would revolve around Tony Snell but I also have a hard time seeing the bulls taking on an idiot like Morris. They are famous for wanting 'their kind of guy' ( white, yes man, from Iowa, from new Mexico, coach's son, ect.).pnjguy wrote:Bulls would love to have him. Great contract and has been ballin' since Horny left.turned2black wrote:Someone take Markieff Morris! PLEASE!!!!!
