Strat wrote:Article on old white men and ther infidelities and how they are part of Trumps inner circle. I think Hillary is going to be ready for any attack that the Donald might throw at her in regards to Bill's past sexploits. The donald will walk right into it.
And he's gonna do it, too. He's fucking DYING to. He's like Jack Nicholson at the end of A Few Good Men. He's just gonna explode with shit about Bill. I'm quite surprised he didn't go ahead and say something at the first one. I'm wondering what the purpose of it is. It wasn't Hillary that cheated. She was the one being cheated ON. Unlike Donald, who as mentioned before, has had quite public trysts while being married.
Hillary should surprise him with Marla Maples sitting in the front row of the next one.
Apparently she is a horrible person and too dumb to be president for staying with her husband. the only response necessary would be "Yea, donald, we worked through our issues and stayed committed to our marriage and God, as opposed to you and all your compadres etc..etc.."
Even if its a bold face lie.
"You know the difference between my husband and you? My husband is smart enough to be ashamed of what he did." And then make those balloon faces.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 5:11 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 6:09 pm
by Fuzzy_Dunlop
tragabigzanda wrote:Wow, 538 is now showing FL for Hillary.
I was just looking at 538 too. On the morning of the debate they had the odds of winning at 54.8 % for Clinton and 45.2 % for Trump. Today it's at 67.2% for Clinton and 32.8% for Trump.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 6:17 pm
by wease
What's 538?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 6:18 pm
by Simple Torture
wease wrote:What's 538?
I'll explain in a minute; I've gotta go take a shit.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 6:20 pm
by Simple Torture
Fuzzy_Dunlop wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Wow, 538 is now showing FL for Hillary.
I was just looking at 538 too. On the morning of the debate they had the odds of winning at 54.8 % for Clinton and 45.2 % for Trump. Today it's at 67.2% for Clinton and 32.8% for Trump.
It'll be very interesting to see how correlated the Presidential and Senate forecasts are towards November, and whether they end up shaking out the same way. As of right now, it sure looks like the GOP's greatest fears--that Trump's presence on top of the ballot will hurt GOPers lower down, even incumbents--might come to pass.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 6:24 pm
by Simple Torture
tragabigzanda wrote:Wow, 538 is now showing FL for Hillary.
I'm still sort of confused as to why they colored it pink in the first place. They changed its status from blue to red around Sept. 15th, and about 2/3 of polls from that period had Clinton up between 1-3 points (and a few had Trump with like a 1-point lead). I imagine it has to do with projections of voter turnout, especially Hispanic voters. It's going to be close down there--Obama only won it by 70,000 votes in '12.
(the 4th quote that time was, "Come on, Stormtrooper!" -Barack Hussein, Obama)
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 7:27 pm
by Strat
Yea that is pretty solid.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 7:32 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 8:15 pm
by dimejinky99
I know this campaign was never sane to begin with but can anyone explain first of all how Trump thinks attacking Hillary over her husbands affairs is going to help him and damage her AT ALL?? if anything or in the normal world it would backfire on him wildly.
Second of all why arent the media or ordinary people talking about how disgusting he is and how disgusting even the idea of it is?
It's so totally insane. He's dragged the whole thing down into a bad episode of Jerry springer.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 8:36 pm
by BurtReynolds
Assuming Clinton wins, I wonder what steps The Man will take to ensure another Trump/Sanders revolt doesn't happen.
BurtReynolds wrote:Assuming Clinton wins, I wonder what steps The Man will take to ensure another Trump/Sanders revolt doesn't happen.
Without a "Chosen One" candidate like Clinton, I could see the democrats fracturing quite a bit, splitting between establishment and socialists. They also might not be so quick to cast off other candidates.
The republicans could try to add superdelegates, but that wouldn't fly I don't think. If Trump bombs, maybe some voters would return to reality, but if things get worse in the next four years (and they will), who knows what would happen.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 9:25 pm
by Bi_3
Wow, I'm deep in Trump country right now. It's like a totally different world 1 hour outside of DC.
