Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread
Posted: Sat February 17, 2024 4:18 pm
I don’t think it’s a competition? I think it’s trying to rally artists together to bring costs down
Seems like a strange question to me, but in any case, if the price gouging is worse than ever relative to incomes (and it is, by a lot) then this "one time" seems like it makes sense to speak out. Interesting that PJ isn't. I would imagine they would.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I don’t think it’s a competition? I think it’s trying to rally artists together to bring costs down
And Cheerio to you too good neighborCoach wrote:Been in the fan club since 1994
Happily requested Vegas and Fenway shows
Love the new song
Don’t mind the drums or production
Happy my fav band is still alive and well and creating new music
Happy that a super fan got to make this record.
Ms Harmless wrote:oh it's definitely a good thing, and I applaud it, but this is one time; and PJ have had many "one times" in their past, so if I cared enough (I don't) I'd be interested in seeing if Smith's historical record of sticking it to the Man is better than Pearl Jam'sJorge wrote:I don't know what that entails but I think calling out price gouging and predatory business practices (and, more importantly, actively opting out of them) is a good thing overall, especially since it directly benefits fans by making the shows accessible to more people than the very wealthyMs Harmless wrote:I love Robert and The Cures, but yeah, I don't remember him being a classically political musician; maybe I'm wrong
Ms Harmless wrote:oh it's definitely a good thing, and I applaud it, but this is one time; and PJ have had many "one times" in their past, so if I cared enough (I don't) I'd be interested in seeing if Smith's historical record of sticking it to the Man is better than Pearl Jam'sJorge wrote:I don't know what that entails but I think calling out price gouging and predatory business practices (and, more importantly, actively opting out of them) is a good thing overall, especially since it directly benefits fans by making the shows accessible to more people than the very wealthyMs Harmless wrote:I love Robert and The Cures, but yeah, I don't remember him being a classically political musician; maybe I'm wrong
Unfortunately, as we know, no one stood beside them. The result? They looked inward for ways to use their platform to control what they could control.stip wrote:Ms Harmless wrote:oh it's definitely a good thing, and I applaud it, but this is one time; and PJ have had many "one times" in their past, so if I cared enough (I don't) I'd be interested in seeing if Smith's historical record of sticking it to the Man is better than Pearl Jam'sJorge wrote:I don't know what that entails but I think calling out price gouging and predatory business practices (and, more importantly, actively opting out of them) is a good thing overall, especially since it directly benefits fans by making the shows accessible to more people than the very wealthyMs Harmless wrote:I love Robert and The Cures, but yeah, I don't remember him being a classically political musician; maybe I'm wrong
if there is a concerted effort to push back from the industry i would hope pearl jam would support it. but i think the 95-96 tour left some deep wounds. i understand why they wouldnt want to fight that fight again, even though i would love to see them do it.
they raise and donate a lot of money and use their platform in ways that are socially and politically responsible even if they aren’t challenging the larger systemic architecture they operate in
Who the f is Serban Ghanea and why do you keep mentioning them?tragabigzanda wrote:They could bless the pro tools sessions with the years of the Virgin Mary. If Serban Ghanea mixed it then why the hell am I listening to it?96583UP wrote:quit being so goddam reasonable!stip wrote:in the meantime what we know is the following
1. The band asked Watt to produce their album based on Eddie’s positive experiences working with him
2. They wrote songs as a unit rather than bringing in near complete compositions
3. The band was very proud of the outcome
4. The band has said that Watt has a deep knowledge of their catalog and would use it to help communicate musical ideas to the band during the writing and recording
5. The one song we have heard thus far has roots in many other moments from the bands history
6. Watt was considered a significant enough collaborator that he was given some writing credits
Conclusions that can be speculatively drawn from this include:
1. Watt was given a writing credit because the band thought he was a collaberative partner in the process and wanted to recognize that (moreso than past producers)
2. Watt insisited he be given one (unlike past producers - really BoB is the only one with the clout to have demanded this)
and less likely
3. The band went to Watt to ask him to write them some hit songs with top 40 potential. that would be the outcome you seem to be leaning towards (I am not trying to strawman you - if there is more to it then please elaborate). Or Pealr Jam are a bunch of doddering old men being taken advantage of by a slick producer (predatory is a strong adjective) But there doesnt seem to be evidence supporting that in pearl jam’s actions beyond the writing credit itself . This seems to be where you are, and other than a deep, abiding, and documented dislike of Watt Im not sure how you got there
trag chose the year 2024 for his PJ purity test
not the one where they started using Ticketmaster
not the one where they sell Merchandise at increasingly absurd prices ('it keeps us alive')
not the one where they played private corporate office party gigs
not the one where they befriended sports-venue owning billionaires
not the one where Ed severely tempered down his political talk so as not to offend those sports-venue owning billionaires
not the one where their album was a frankenstein of clips written in silos and then stitched together by the soundman
but the one where they played live in a room together and had a young person help bring out their best and gave him a credit for doing so
that was a bridge too far
the horror
btw US aggregate inflation is up over 20% since 3 years ago so people biiishing about ticket prices need to get the big picture. This isn't a PJ-specific thing
An audio engineer who has mixed a ton of pop records. Mixed DMlecherouslittlestump wrote:
Who the f is Serban Ghanea and why do you keep mentioning them?
of course it's not a competition, I'm responding to the idea that PJ is not doing it enough compared to Robert Smith's one tweet hereE.H. Ruddock wrote:I don’t think it’s a competition? I think it’s trying to rally artists together to bring costs down
I don't think they run the Wishlist foundationMs Harmless wrote:I'd rather they do that, and continue running the Wishlist foundation, than make my ticket cheaper
well then it's run for them, I don't know, but that's splitting hairsJorge wrote:I don't think they run the Wishlist foundationMs Harmless wrote:I'd rather they do that, and continue running the Wishlist foundation, than make my ticket cheaper