Red Mosquito

Again, the bible is so full of rape and weird punitive sexual shit that this is right up their alley.

McParadigm wrote:Everything I believe about rural conservatism in a single headline: trashy, bottomless repugnance, and they can't even spell.

Jesus. If I had been drinking something it would have gone all over. Holy shit.

tragabigzanda wrote:Ooh good point, the awards shows could be fun this year.

They will be soooo boooring.

Please no

tragabigzanda wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Ooh good point, the awards shows could be fun this year.

They will be soooo boooring.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but they need to get Ricky Gervais to host everything this year.

Jimmy did a good job. I would ask him. But the coolest choice would be Louie CK.

Fuck yeah.

VinylGuy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:Ooh good point, the awards shows could be fun this year.

They will be soooo boooring.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but they need to get Ricky Gervais to host everything this year.

Jimmy did a good job. I would ask him. But the coolest choice would be Louie CK.

Fuck yeah.

Did the other Affleck win something last year? They have to show up. It's a law I think.

Alrighty then

dimejinky99 wrote:Alrighty then

That’s an interesting discussion... if the average sentence for possession of that material is really 95 months, that’s roughly the same as the average sentence for rape but without the offender having committed a violent assault against another human.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Whether or not a work of art is good or bad has precisely zero to do with whether or not the artist is a good person. This really isn't complicated. Policing your own taste because of social guilt is insanity.

If someone wants to make the personal decision of boycotting someone's works after something like this comes out, that fine. But when you start judging others for not joining you in what is essentially a (well intentioned, I'm sure) moral initiative, you turn a lot of people off, including many who might otherwise agree with you. Too often the SJW argument amounts to "you're either with us, or you're with the bigots."

The singer of Brand New admitted to accusations of sharing nudes with a 15 year old in 2004. Sucks, they were a really good band but now I’ll think of them as shitty explotative emo fuckwads. Their new album was just a bunch of Modest Mouse and grunge ripoffs anyway.

Jammer XCI wrote:The singer of Brand New admitted to accusations of sharing nudes with a 15 year old in 2004. Sucks, they were a really good band but now I’ll think of them as shitty explotative emo fuckwads. Their new album was just a bunch of Modest Mouse and grunge ripoffs anyway.

Hope you’re not too attached to Led Zeppelin:

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists ... n-19691231

Everybody knows that 70's rockstars fucked teenagers all the time. Bowie, Jimmy, Lemmy, Steven Tyler, Ted "the 'ped" Nugent.

Brand New dude was using fucking AIM to chat up teenagers, it doesn't get more 2004 than that.

it's different when you're jimmy page because the teenager wants to have sex with you and forever considers it a thrill of a lifetime

Bi_3 wrote:

dimejinky99 wrote:Alrighty then

That’s an interesting discussion... if the average sentence for possession of that material is really 95 months, that’s roughly the same as the average sentence for rape but without the offender having committed a violent assault against another human.

SCOTUS says simulated child porn is a-okay. If you get busted with the real shit, then you just suck at photoshop.

I wonder how tech companies deal with child porn on their servers. I assume delete it immediately, but do they contact the feds, even though they may still be liable for any of this material being on their computers ever?

Jammer XCI wrote:The singer of Brand New admitted to accusations of sharing nudes with a 15 year old in 2004. Sucks, they were a really good band but now I’ll think of them as shitty explotative emo fuckwads. Their new album was just a bunch of Modest Mouse and grunge ripoffs anyway.

Does that mean he had nudes of a 15yo, gave nudes of himself to a 15yo, or gave general porn to a 15yo? Does the distinction matter?

Maybe we should redirect this thread before it gets creepy.

asking for a friend.