Page 29 of 47

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:03 pm
by epilogue
cutuphalfdead wrote:I haven't seen this but I'm just gonna go ahead and say I'm on Team Joey.
:luv:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:04 pm
by epilogue
Again, let me know when/if you do see it. I'd love your thoughts on it. Especially as someone a tad younger than me and a little further removed from the original films.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:07 pm
by spike
there's a good chance my wife an i will see this over the weekend, as it will be hotter than the surface of the sun outside.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:09 pm
by Strat
We might see this tonight.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:09 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I'm pretty upset that these Twitter trolls have put people in the unfortunate position of having to defend Leslie Jones

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:13 pm
by Kaius
I was all in on Ghostbusters when I was a kid. I didn't see them until they were airing on USA Network in the early 90s, but they left a strong impression and the follow up cartoon series and video games and toys were all childhood staples.

I also groaned when I first heard about this movie. And I groaned again when I saw the first preview. And I groaned (in my head) a couple of times when watching the movie.

Having said all of that: I had a lot of fun watching this and I think they did an overall really good job with the "reboot". I would watch it again and I look forward to seeing these characters again in a sequel.

Kate McKinnon.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:13 pm
by Norah
durdencommatyler wrote:Again, let me know when/if you do see it. I'd love your thoughts on it. Especially as someone a tad younger than me and a little further removed from the original films.
The originals were a big part of my childhood, Joey.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:13 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
spike wrote:there's a good chance my wife an i will see this over the weekend, as it will be hotter than the surface of the sun outside.
same here, but without a wife.

It is gonna be hot.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:14 pm
by Kaius
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
spike wrote:there's a good chance my wife an i will see this over the weekend, as it will be hotter than the surface of the sun outside.
same here, but without a wife.

It is gonna be hot.
Uh. What

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:15 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
spike wrote:there's a good chance my wife an i will see this over the weekend, as it will be hotter than the surface of the sun outside.
same here, but without a wife.

It is gonna be hot.
Uh. What
The weather is going to be hot, like spike said. Not me watching Ghostbusters alone.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:15 pm
by epilogue
Strat wrote:We might see this tonight.
I hope you enjoy at least some of it. It's nowhere near as bad as the trailers made it look, I promise. I can't say you'll love it but I'll be shocked if you think it's completely terrible.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:16 pm
by spike
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
spike wrote:there's a good chance my wife an i will see this over the weekend, as it will be hotter than the surface of the sun outside.
same here, but without a wife.

It is gonna be hot.
Uh. What
The weather is going to be hot, like spike said. Not me watching Ghostbusters alone.
Kate McKinnon

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:17 pm
by Kaius
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
spike wrote:there's a good chance my wife an i will see this over the weekend, as it will be hotter than the surface of the sun outside.
same here, but without a wife.

It is gonna be hot.
Uh. What
The weather is going to be hot, like spike said. Not me watching Ghostbusters alone.
I totally glossed over the "without wife" part. I'm sorry.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:22 pm
by epilogue
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Kaius wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
spike wrote:there's a good chance my wife an i will see this over the weekend, as it will be hotter than the surface of the sun outside.
same here, but without a wife.

It is gonna be hot.
Uh. What
The weather is going to be hot, like spike said. Not me watching Ghostbusters alone.
I'm gonna go ahead and pretend it's both.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:23 pm
by epilogue
cutuphalfdead wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Again, let me know when/if you do see it. I'd love your thoughts on it. Especially as someone a tad younger than me and a little further removed from the original films.
The originals were a big part of my childhood, Joey.
Oh. Alright. Well, I still want to know what you think of it.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 7:24 pm
by epilogue
Kaius wrote:I was all in on Ghostbusters when I was a kid. I didn't see them until they were airing on USA Network in the early 90s, but they left a strong impression and the follow up cartoon series and video games and toys were all childhood staples.

I also groaned when I first heard about this movie. And I groaned again when I saw the first preview. And I groaned (in my head) a couple of times when watching the movie.

Having said all of that: I had a lot of fun watching this and I think they did an overall really good job with the "reboot". I would watch it again and I look forward to seeing these characters again in a sequel.

Kate McKinnon.
This is basically me, too.

I still wish they'd come up with a new concept rather rebooting an older movie. But, whatever. They pulled it off well. It's a lot of fun inspite of its flaws and groans. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 8:15 pm
by spike

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 8:22 pm
by Kaius
I don't want to see her type cast as "the wacky one", but I would love to see her as the Joker.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Tue July 19, 2016 9:30 pm
by VinylGuy
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'm pretty upset that these Twitter trolls have put people in the unfortunate position of having to defend Leslie Jones
:haha:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Posted: Wed July 20, 2016 12:59 am
by epilogue
Kaius wrote:I don't want to see her type cast as "the wacky one", but I would love to see her as the Joker.
:shock:

That's... no, dude, seriously, that's actually brilliant.