Page 29 of 44

Re: Congress

Posted: Fri January 27, 2023 11:56 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Congress

Posted: Sat January 28, 2023 3:11 am
by simple schoolboy
The Pelosis had every right to complain about the police response, which would have cleared up some of the early reporting. That dispatcher transcript was atrocious and selectively leaked to make Paul Pelosi seem like an unreliable narrator as opposed to clearly under distress.

Re: Congress

Posted: Wed February 08, 2023 7:18 pm
by Bi_3
I'm a big Sinema stan, but she's drifted so far away from self-awareness it's over for her.

Re: Congress

Posted: Wed February 08, 2023 9:03 pm
by B
Bi_3 wrote:I'm a big Sinema stan, but she's drifted so far away from self-awareness it's over for her.
Image

Re: Congress

Posted: Wed February 08, 2023 9:43 pm
by elliseamos
It's supposed to look like a golden Gizmo, right?

Re: Congress

Posted: Wed February 08, 2023 10:00 pm
by Bi_3
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:I'm a big Sinema stan, but she's drifted so far away from self-awareness it's over for her.
Image

Exactly. The legally blonde act needs to be over for her, she vibes like she is about to start filming tiktoks on the Senate floor.

Re: Congress

Posted: Wed February 08, 2023 11:29 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Congress

Posted: Wed February 08, 2023 11:32 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: Congress

Posted: Mon February 27, 2023 12:54 am
by Bi_3
Spoiler in the thread title

Re: Congress

Posted: Mon February 27, 2023 6:23 pm
by blueviper
Bi_3 wrote:Spoiler in the thread title
debunked in 2014

Re: Congress

Posted: Thu March 02, 2023 3:21 am
by wease
Apparently MTG doesn’t really know what “seized” means.

Re: Congress

Posted: Thu March 02, 2023 1:21 pm
by Bi_3
blueviper wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Spoiler in the thread title
debunked in 2014

Ugh, sorry. It’s really hard to tell without easing hundreds of comments

Re: Congress

Posted: Thu March 02, 2023 2:38 pm
by The Argonaut
I hoped you've learned a lesson today, Bi_3

Re: Congress

Posted: Thu March 02, 2023 3:26 pm
by Bi_3
The Argonaut wrote:I hoped you've learned a lesson today, Bi_3

Nope

Re: Congress

Posted: Mon March 06, 2023 6:29 am
by BurtReynolds
Impressive

Image

Re: Congress

Posted: Mon March 06, 2023 10:44 am
by elliseamos
Good for him.

Re: Congress

Posted: Mon March 06, 2023 5:38 pm
by blueviper
That's cool how he got his hair to match the podium.

Re: Congress

Posted: Mon March 06, 2023 6:19 pm
by Bammer
blueviper wrote:That's cool how he got his hair to match the podium.
:nice:

Re: Congress

Posted: Fri May 26, 2023 2:51 am
by elliseamos
WASHINGTON, May 25 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden and top congressional Republican Kevin McCarthy are closing in on a deal that would raise the government's $31.4 trillion debt ceiling for two years while capping spending on most items, a U.S. official told Reuters.

The deal, which is not final, would increase funding for discretionary spending on military and veterans while essentially holding non-defense discretionary spending at current year levels, the official said, who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak about internal discussions.

Re: Congress

Posted: Thu September 21, 2023 4:23 pm
by McParadigm
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congre ... rcna111338
For the second time this week, House Republicans on Thursday failed to start debate on a key military funding bill after five conservative rebels blocked the measure over demands for additional spending cuts.

The defeat marked yet another public embarrassment for Speaker Kevin McCarthy and House Republicans as Washington barrels toward a government shutdown.

The vote was 212-216. The Republicans who voted no were Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia; Dan Bishop of North Carolina; Matt Rosendale of Montana; and Andy Biggs and Eli Crane, both of Arizona. Rules Committee Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., later switched his vote to no, a procedural move that will allow him to bring the bill up again.

Thursday's vote came after House Republicans had reported significant progress following a more than two-hour "family meeting" in the basement of the Capitol on Wednesday evening. McCarthy and others had hoped that a successful vote on the military bill would hand Republicans some momentum to pass a short-term funding bill to avert a government shutdown slated for Oct. 1.

After hours of discussion in that meeting, McCarthy had pitched a new strategy for House Republicans in the funding fight.

Caving to demands of the hard-right rebels, the speaker agreed to move a one-month, short-term government funding bill, known as a continuing resolution or CR, with a topline funding level of $1.471 trillion — much lower than the Senate’s CR, according to lawmakers leaving the meeting. House Republicans will need to pass something that can also get through the Democratic-controlled Senate and earn President Joe Biden's signature before midnight on Sept. 30 to avoid a shutdown.

Some Republicans doubted McCarthy's new approach would work. Vocal McCarthy foe, Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., told his colleagues in Wednesday's meeting that there were seven GOP no votes for any CR, enough to tank it, though conservative Rep. Bob Good, R-Va., and others pushed back on Gaetz's math.

"I am not voting for a CR. I am not voting for a CR," Gaetz told reporters.