Page 281 of 1272
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Fri February 19, 2016 11:20 pm
by nyquillyn
People are putting way too much stock in this "The Spurs lose to winning teams" thing. Pop's policy has always been to stockpile wins against shitty teams and don't overextend players in close regular season games.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Fri February 19, 2016 11:25 pm
by verb_to_trust
People put way too much stock in pops policy then, if you ask me. Was losing in the first round last year just part of pops master plan for this season?
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Fri February 19, 2016 11:42 pm
by nyquillyn
You live by it, you die by it.
Resting people and "taking it easy" in the regular season paid off in 2013 and 2014. Last year, not so much.
They're on the Rodeo Road Trip right now. I have no problems mailing it in against the Clips with the Lakers, Suns and Kings up next.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Fri February 19, 2016 11:47 pm
by verb_to_trust
The Bulls beat the Spurs. Explain that.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 12:38 am
by verb_to_trust
Spurs fans are the St Louis Cardinal fans of the NBA.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 1:22 am
by nyquillyn
I don't follow baseball, so I don't really know what that means.
It's been my experience that Spurs fans are generally pretty knowledgeable and dedicated. But then again all I have to compare them to is idiot Suns fans and a few Bulls fans in my family.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 2:16 am
by verb_to_trust
I just fin d it convenient that Spurs fans can put every loss on some sort of savvy pop is a genius shit.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 3:16 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
verb_to_trust wrote:I just fin d it convenient that Spurs fans can put every loss on some sort of savvy pop is a genius shit.
you've never had a coach half as good as pops in chicago so shut your fucking mouth
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:00 am
by verb_to_trust
Phil Jackson?
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:01 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
verb_to_trust wrote:Phil Jackson?
the lakers guy?
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:05 am
by verb_to_trust
The guy with guy with 11 titles between two teams
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:06 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
verb_to_trust wrote:The guy with guy with 11 titles between two teams
i looked him up, he's no pops
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:16 am
by verb_to_trust
You're right. He's not an inferior coach who has had less success.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:17 am
by verb_to_trust
Rose stats since Christmas: fg % 45.6 3p % 32.6 ppg 19.0 in 31 mpg.
Those are nba starter level numbers. Suck it rose haters.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:20 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
verb_to_trust wrote:Rose stats since Christmas: fg % 45.6 3p % 32.6 ppg 19.0 in 31 mpg.
Those are nba starter level numbers. Suck it rose haters.
are you telling yourself to suck it?
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 4:45 am
by verb_to_trust
Warriors getting smashed
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sat February 20, 2016 5:53 am
by verb_to_trust
Fitting that on the day I read about how Stephanie is going to add a post game to his arsenal Dame shits on him for 51 points in 31 minutes of action.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sun February 21, 2016 5:45 pm
by nyquillyn
Spurs @ Suns today. Would like to go, but two kiddos are sick.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Sun February 21, 2016 6:11 pm
by verb_to_trust
Pops got his starters back in with instructions to get the win I bet.
Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Mon February 22, 2016 1:02 am
by nyquillyn
Ugh. That was basically unwatchable. Glad I didn't go.