Page 281 of 472
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 9:33 pm
by Bi_3
Strat wrote:wease wrote:Strat wrote:Article on old white men and ther infidelities and how they are part of Trumps inner circle. I think Hillary is going to be ready for any attack that the Donald might throw at her in regards to Bill's past sexploits. The donald will walk right into it.
And he's gonna do it, too. He's fucking DYING to. He's like Jack Nicholson at the end of A Few Good Men. He's just gonna explode with shit about Bill. I'm quite surprised he didn't go ahead and say something at the first one. I'm wondering what the purpose of it is. It wasn't Hillary that cheated. She was the one being cheated ON. Unlike Donald, who as mentioned before, has had quite public trysts while being married.
Hillary should surprise him with Marla Maples sitting in the front row of the next one.
Apparently she is a horrible person and too dumb to be president for staying with her husband. the only response necessary would be "Yea, donald, we worked through our issues and stayed committed to our marriage and God, as opposed to you and all your compadres etc..etc.."
Even if its a bold face lie.
It would backfire. She stayed with Bill for the sole purpose of getting to eventually be the blue team nominee for president. Best to not go there.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 9:48 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 9:50 pm
by BurtReynolds
There's really no reason to go into it at all.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 9:57 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 10:29 pm
by McParadigm
It's actually gotta be really weird that, in order to get the job you crave, you will have to spend many, many hours in the room where your spouse betrayed you.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 10:46 pm
by Citizen Dick
McParadigm wrote:It's actually gotta be really weird that, in order to get the job you crave, you will have to spend many, many hours in the room where your spouse betrayed you.
This is a good point and goes a long way to explaining why the Star Wars prequels are so shit. George wrote them sitting at a desk beneath a giant stain glass window - one of many he'd had installed throughout Skywalker Ranch...
The guy who made those stained glasses was also boning George's wife at the time and ended up running off with her.
It's probably the best reason I've heard to vote Trump 2016.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 11:15 pm
by BurtReynolds
At least we know Trump can't do anything worse than Attack of the Clones.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 11:57 pm
by wease
I just heard an interview with Jill Stein. My God she was a grating personality. I actually agreed with a couple of her points, but the rest of the time she sounded like a complete loon.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Fri September 30, 2016 11:58 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 1:54 am
by Citizen Dick
BurtReynolds wrote:At least we know Trump can't do anything worse than Attack of the Clones.

Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 1:58 am
by dimejinky99
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 2:03 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Except that stuff doesn't affect him at all. He probably never even saw that. He doesn't give a shit about Elizabeth Warren
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 2:10 am
by Citizen Dick
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Except that stuff doesn't affect him at all. He probably never even saw that. He doesn't give a shit about Elizabeth Warren
How about Princess Amidala? Because, her criticism was pretty withering.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 2:17 am
by Simple Torture
Citizen Dick wrote:McParadigm wrote:It's actually gotta be really weird that, in order to get the job you crave, you will have to spend many, many hours in the room where your spouse betrayed you.
This is a good point and goes a long way to explaining why the Star Wars prequels are so shit. George wrote them sitting at a desk beneath a giant stain glass window - one of many he'd had installed throughout Skywalker Ranch...
The guy who made those stained glasses was also boning George's wife at the time and ended up running off with her.
It's probably the best reason I've heard to vote Trump 2016.
Can we give out an award for "Post That Sounds Most Like A Dime Post But Isn't A Dime Post"?
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 2:25 am
by BurtReynolds
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 2:28 am
by Simple Torture
BurtReynolds wrote:
A new challenger emerges.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 3:10 am
by Citizen Dick
Simple Torture wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:
A new challenger emerges.
Are there multiple awards in play? I could probably make up a paragraph about how the Ben Hur remake is better than the Heston version and go for an LV prize.
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 4:42 am
by LoathedVermin72
Citizen Dick wrote:Simple Torture wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:
A new challenger emerges.
Are there multiple awards in play? I could probably make up a paragraph about how the Ben Hur remake is better than the Heston version and go for an LV prize.
At first I was like "WTF" but then I was like "haha yeah that sounds like me"
Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 5:31 am
by Citizen Dick
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Citizen Dick wrote:Simple Torture wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:
A new challenger emerges.
Are there multiple awards in play? I could probably make up a paragraph about how the Ben Hur remake is better than the Heston version and go for an LV prize.
At first I was like "WTF" but then I was like "haha yeah that sounds like me"
No offense meant, just taking the low hanging fruit. I actually enjoy your perspective... Even if I almost never agree with it

Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sat October 01, 2016 6:30 pm
by 96583UP
McParadigm wrote:In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.
This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.
Amazing. Next will be the editorial board of RedPlum.