Page 30 of 199
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 05, 2018 2:39 am
by 96583UP
Simple Torture wrote:96583UP wrote:it was the shape of a man's ass shitting out rainbow-colored c*m on the floor of a san francisco bath house
So in Obama's America, a 3/10?
only because it was a registered republican ass
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Thu June 21, 2018 2:56 pm
by Green Habit
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Fri June 22, 2018 12:54 am
by Bi_3
What’s your take on the gerrymandering decision?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Mon June 25, 2018 5:50 pm
by B
Well. Fuck.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 2:31 pm
by McParadigm
Partyline vote gives the travel ban a Supreme Court victory.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 3:18 pm
by B
Well. Fuck.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 3:45 pm
by Green Habit
McParadigm wrote:Partyline vote gives the travel ban a Supreme Court victory.
Kennedy's concurrence is a real WTF.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 3:47 pm
by Green Habit
Bi_3 wrote:What’s your take on the gerrymandering decision?
Disappointing. Between this and the travel ban case Kennedy's really being cowardly to end this term.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 3:57 pm
by Norah
So what's next, ban on immigration from central America?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 4:07 pm
by digster
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 4:09 pm
by digster
Although that doesn't really seem like someone who would want to retire with Trump choosing his replacement.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 4:12 pm
by Green Habit
digster wrote:Although that doesn't really seem like someone who would want to retire with Trump choosing his replacement.
Several others have been speculating that. Reasonable guess, but only Kennedy himself knows.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 4:22 pm
by digster
Also, there is zero mechanism for Democrats to pull a Garland until 2020, correct? If they win the House (which seems more likely) but don't win the Senate (which seems more likely), Democrats will still be out in the cold until Trump is voted out or they turn the Senate two years later. The House isn't involved in Supreme Court nominations at all, correct?
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Tue June 26, 2018 4:28 pm
by Green Habit
digster wrote:Also, there is zero mechanism for Democrats to pull a Garland until 2020, correct? If they win the House (which seems more likely) but don't win the Senate (which seems more likely), Democrats will still be out in the cold until Trump is voted out or they turn the Senate two years later. The House isn't involved in Supreme Court nominations at all, correct?
Correct.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed June 27, 2018 12:48 am
by 96583UP
Judd Apatow: The Supreme Court are Nazis
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed June 27, 2018 2:07 pm
by Green Habit
I can think of a few of you that may

this, but this gets a huge

from me.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 6_2b3j.pdf
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed June 27, 2018 3:44 pm
by B
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.
Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed June 27, 2018 6:08 pm
by ---
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed June 27, 2018 6:08 pm
by @SkitchP
B wrote:
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.
Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.
That would backfire immediately. All the employer would have to do is give disproportionate raises and leave to the people who opt out and then the union likely goes away entirely.
Re: The Supreme Court
Posted: Wed June 27, 2018 6:16 pm
by Green Habit
@SkitchP wrote:B wrote:
I'm fine with it, as long as people who refuse to pay the dues are stripped of any pay raises negotiated by the union, overtime pay, health insurance, holiday leave, and grievance procedures.
Unions have been giving workers benefits for so long, people don't see how much better off they are b/c of them.
That would backfire immediately. All the employer would have to do is give disproportionate raises and leave to the people who opt out and then the union likely goes away entirely.
Bingo.