durdencommatyler wrote:No, he really doesn't like JJ Abrams.bada wrote:McP really doesn't like the idea of characters reverting back to old behavior.
Im not sure what Sir McP does like
durdencommatyler wrote:No, he really doesn't like JJ Abrams.bada wrote:McP really doesn't like the idea of characters reverting back to old behavior.
he likes hating.Strat wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:No, he really doesn't like JJ Abrams.bada wrote:McP really doesn't like the idea of characters reverting back to old behavior.
Im not sure what Sir McP does like
Alls I know is that I like popcorn. And a McP post.Strat wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:No, he really doesn't like JJ Abrams.bada wrote:McP really doesn't like the idea of characters reverting back to old behavior.
Im not sure what Sir McP does like
durdencommatyler wrote:No, he really doesn't like JJ Abrams.bada wrote:McP really doesn't like the idea of characters reverting back to old behavior.
What I don't understand is why he bangs his head on a desk over something he would probably say is a silly cartoon movie franchise designed to sell toys and funny books to children.bada wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:No, he really doesn't like JJ Abrams.bada wrote:McP really doesn't like the idea of characters reverting back to old behavior.
His old Han post and why Nolan's Bruce Wayne couldn't be Batman again after Rises posts follow a similar pattern. He's big into personal growth and leaving behind foolishness and if you go back you ruins it precious.
That's what it became to George Lucas. At the outset it was a really great backdrop for epic storytelling, and a re-invigoration of one particular genre (science fiction) which had splintered into excruciating camp and works that crawled completely up their own asses.BurtReynolds wrote:What I don't understand is why he bangs his head on a desk over something he would probably say is a silly cartoon movie franchise designed to sell toys and funny books to children.
His old Han post and why Nolan's Bruce Wayne couldn't be Batman again after Rises posts follow a similar pattern. He's big into personal growth and leaving behind foolishness and if you go back you ruins it precious.
I appreciate the aside, there, and that's mostly accurate. But in regards to the first post, it's more to do with the value and function of storytelling than it is with characterization.He loves these movies he just wants more originality and creativity.
Popcorn in a movie theater is tits, if you smuggle in enough booze to go with it. Otherwise licorice, thanks.Alls I know is that I like popcorn. And a McP post.
It's the most fun a girl can have without taking off her evil robes.he likes hating.

I like it when I manage to seed half a page with other people's grumblings about my grumblings. That's a knee for a bee. I guess I like the first ten minutes or so of A Christmas Carol, before it gets all squished up and preachy (although the orphanage, work party, and cemetery scenes are generally sound). I like cookies that other people are planning on eating later but have left momentarily unattended, so long as they do not contain nuts. If there's a Hershey's kiss in the center and it's kind of gooey, I consider that a bonus. I like Goodluck Jonathan, but I only know him by name. Maybe he's a mass murderer. Still. I like oral...preferably from someone else's girl, but mine will do in a pinch. I like season two of the original Star Trek and season three of the Next Generation. The world is really weird...I like that. Blockbuster movies that do something unexpected or beyond the frames of formula. Oh, Firefly was pretty good, too. And World's End. You know, the Catch 22 movie was a lot better than it gets credit for. Barry Lyndon, Seventh Seal, City of Lost Children, Arrested Development. Mel Brooks to a point. I like those. The written word. The many remarkable things that can be done with it. I prefer both reading and listening to watching. I like calling in sick to work when I'm not really sick, and I sometimes like wondering what this was all about:Im not sure what Sir McP does like

McParadigm wrote:That's what it became to George Lucas. At the outset it was a really great backdrop for epic storytelling, and a re-invigoration of one particular genre (science fiction) which had splintered into excruciating camp and works that crawled completely up their own asses.BurtReynolds wrote:What I don't understand is why he bangs his head on a desk over something he would probably say is a silly cartoon movie franchise designed to sell toys and funny books to children.
His old Han post and why Nolan's Bruce Wayne couldn't be Batman again after Rises posts follow a similar pattern. He's big into personal growth and leaving behind foolishness and if you go back you ruins it precious.I appreciate the aside, there, and that's mostly accurate. But in regards to the first post, it's more to do with the value and function of storytelling than it is with characterization.He loves these movies he just wants more originality and creativity.
Stories have an arc, and those arcs have resolutions that are uniquely different from their beginnings. These differences are not unimportant. I honestly don't understand why anybody would want to treat them like they're not, when all they can possibly do is enhance your results.
Popcorn in a movie theater is tits, if you smuggle in enough booze to go with it. Otherwise licorice, thanks.Alls I know is that I like popcorn. And a McP post.
It's the most fun a girl can have without taking off her evil robes.he likes hating.
It's also no mistake that the character who most embraces hatred in the prequels is literally the only one who seems to be enjoying themselves. Ever.
I like it when I manage to seed half a page with other people's grumblings about my grumblings. That's a knee for a bee. I guess I like the first ten minutes or so of A Christmas Carol, before it gets all squished up and preachy (although the orphanage, work party, and cemetery scenes are generally sound). I like cookies that other people are planning on eating later but have left momentarily unattended, so long as they do not contain nuts. If there's a Hershey's kiss in the center and it's kind of gooey, I consider that a bonus. I like Goodluck Jonathan, but I only know him by name. Maybe he's a mass murderer. Still. I like oral...preferably from someone else's girl, but mine will do in a pinch. I like season two of the original Star Trek and season three of the Next Generation. The world is really weird...I like that. Blockbuster movies that do something unexpected or beyond the frames of formula. Oh, Firefly was pretty good, too. And World's End. You know, the Catch 22 movie was a lot better than it gets credit for. Barry Lyndon, Seventh Seal, City of Lost Children, Arrested Development. Mel Brooks to a point. I like those. The written word. The many remarkable things that can be done with it. I prefer both reading and listening to watching. I like calling in sick to work when I'm not really sick, and I sometimes like wondering what this was all about:Im not sure what Sir McP does like
Beyond that...I guess I like negativity on the internet.
That might be the whole list.
We've come full circle at this point, except instead of camp and self indulgence we are stuck hoping for creativity from 35 year old "franchises" starring 80 year olds. Its a ridiculous thing to even hope for, yet here we are. But in order to re-invigorate the genre again, these sad old things need to die, but I don't see that happening any time soon. If the prequels weren't enough to kill off Star Wars, nothing will. All our asses will be in the seats whenever this comes out. Because we deserve it.McParadigm wrote:That's what it became to George Lucas. At the outset it was a really great backdrop for epic storytelling, and a re-invigoration of one particular genre (science fiction) which had splintered into excruciating camp and works that crawled completely up their own asses.BurtReynolds wrote:What I don't understand is why he bangs his head on a desk over something he would probably say is a silly cartoon movie franchise designed to sell toys and funny books to children.
no argument from me, i love hating!McParadigm wrote:It's the most fun a girl can have without taking off her evil robes.he likes hating.
It's also no mistake that the character who most embraces hatred in the prequels is literally the only one who seems to be enjoying themselves. Ever.
BurtReynolds wrote:we are stuck hoping for creativity from 35 year old "franchises" starring 80 year olds. Its a ridiculous thing to even hope for...If the prequels weren't enough to kill off Star Wars, nothing will.

what was your favorite part of PM?Anders wrote:I think Phantom Menace could have been quite good with a few changes. Shorter pod race, less silly/comical Jar Jar, no midi chlorians, etc. In AOC the romance and some of the battle stuff should have been done different. ROTS was a return to form, and a good movie.
I agree with this statement, except to note that Liam Gon Gin's choices don't tend to make a whole lot of sense most of the time, either.BurtReynolds wrote:it doesn't help that literally nothing they do over the course of the entire movie, from the smallest decision to the largest, makes any sense whatsoever. at least jar jar had an excuse: he was mentally ill.
This has to be one of the most fascinating sentences in the history of the language.Yes, I like him (Watto).
Sidious (Palpatine) has a fantastic story.BurtReynolds wrote:I can understand the jar jar hate, but I never understood why more people didn't hate those stupid Japanese stereotype bad guy aliens. they were far more annoying to me. it doesn't help that literally nothing they do over the course of the entire movie, from the smallest decision to the largest, makes any sense whatsoever. at least jar jar had an excuse: he was mentally ill.
It's Star Wars, not Hamlet. The original trilogy has lots of silly aliens.McParadigm wrote:I agree with this statement, except to note that Liam Gon Gin's choices don't tend to make a whole lot of sense most of the time, either.BurtReynolds wrote:it doesn't help that literally nothing they do over the course of the entire movie, from the smallest decision to the largest, makes any sense whatsoever. at least jar jar had an excuse: he was mentally ill.
This has to be one of the most fascinating sentences in the history of the language.Yes, I like him (Watto).