Page 30 of 31

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 2:07 am
by Jorge
I think she's in her late 20s. You're safe.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 2:16 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Also Cap is pretty studly

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 2:17 am
by Jorge
He's 16.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 2:18 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Heh.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:28 am
by stip
B wrote:

These aren't bad, but particularly the fact that no one pointed out to Ross that New York, DC, and Sarcovia would all have been immeasurably worse had the Avengers not been involved.
That's true, but the point of the accords is not to stop the avengers - it is to establish a body that can be held accountable for the detection.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 11:59 am
by @SkitchP
stip wrote:
B wrote:

These aren't bad, but particularly the fact that no one pointed out to Ross that New York, DC, and Sarcovia would all have been immeasurably worse had the Avengers not been involved.
That's true, but the point of the accords is not to stop the avengers - it is to establish a body that can be held accountable for the detection.

Yeah, that video is pretty dumb.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 12:28 pm
by stip
it is from an idiotic website

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 12:29 pm
by @SkitchP
stip wrote:it is from an idiotic website

I know stip, i just posted in the thread.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 12:30 pm
by stip
i cant wait for.
Spoiler: show
the moment in infinity war when stark returns cap's shield

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 12:35 pm
by B
stip wrote:
B wrote:

These aren't bad, but particularly the fact that no one pointed out to Ross that New York, DC, and Sarcovia would all have been immeasurably worse had the Avengers not been involved.
That's true, but the point of the accords is not to stop the avengers - it is to establish a body that can be held accountable for the detection.
Sure, but many more Avengers may have ended up on Cap's side had they argued about this. Setting Sarcovia aside b/c well, Stark made Ultron (oops!), is the governing body going to be similar at all to the one that launched the nuke on New York, or that was heavily infiltrated by Hydra in Winter Soldier or the shot the shit out Berkley trying to capture the Hulk who was not Hulking out all that often until they started attacking him?

At the very least, Black Widow wouldn't have signed up for registration.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 12:37 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
You guys should all be watching Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. right now.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 1:08 pm
by B
E.H. Ruddock wrote:You guys should all be watching Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. right now.
I don't think such a statement has ever been made before by anyone not employed by ABC.

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:15 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:15 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:15 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:15 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:15 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:16 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:16 pm
by BurtReynolds
Image

Re: Captain America: Civil War (2016)

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:18 pm
by stip
Those are great