Page 30 of 94

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:11 am
by spike
stip wrote:
spike wrote:that was painful.
the album, or my posting?
yes

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:12 am
by stip
arcade fire would do well to learn how to economize the way you do.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:40 am
by spike
man, when the guitar kicks in on it's never over (oh orpheus). fuck.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:43 am
by Soma.
8-)

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:50 am
by spike
best riff i've heard in awhile, pal. AF's good for one or two of those a record.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:56 am
by Soma.
I know what you mean. It packs a similar punch to that guitar line in "Power Out" on Funeral.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 3:58 am
by Reflection
This is what happens when you solicit an opinion from someone who doesn't like songs over 3:00, on an album where the songs are all over 5:00.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 4:08 am
by Soma.
It can be simplified further by stating that he still likes Pearl Jam. Nothing to see here, folks.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 4:15 am
by spike
i stopped liking pearl jam before they were uncool.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 4:16 am
by malice
i never liked them

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 4:16 am
by Reflection
I still like Pearl Jam. I also enjoy Stip's writing, lyrical interpretations and enthusiasm. But I also recognize that he incorectly doesn't like songs to have any length, or jams, or space, or anything that isn't concise. So I don't see him liking Arcade Fire despite their obvious eliteness.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 4:35 am
by BurtReynolds
So i probably shouldn't bother introducing him to stoner rock?

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 4:39 am
by Soma.
Or doom/sludge/drone. You're tearing us apart, Stip!

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 6:12 am
by Norah
stip wrote:

Thus far there are musical elements in pretty much all the songs I like quite a bit, but these nice little moments keep getting bulldozed by heavy handed self important passages and musical choices I don't like.
This is pretty much how I feel about Lightning Bolt.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 6:14 am
by Norah
BurtReynolds wrote:Toldja he'd love it.
Look at those normals go.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 6:29 am
by Harry Lime
man, Oh Orpheus is still kicking my ass.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 6:37 am
by Harry Lime
And "Flashbulb Eyes" & "HCTNT" together is just great.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 7:06 am
by digster
This was a wonderful mess of a record. I can't place it in their catalog yet in terms of what I like best, but they really pulled it off.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 7:41 am
by zeb
This band is building a nice little catalogue.

Re: Arcade Fire

Posted: Sat October 26, 2013 9:03 am
by stip
Reflection wrote:I still like Pearl Jam. I also enjoy Stip's writing, lyrical interpretations and enthusiasm. But I also recognize that he incorectly doesn't like songs to have any length, or jams, or space, or anything that isn't concise. So I don't see him liking Arcade Fire despite their obvious eliteness.

to stick with the pearl jam theme, Infallible is my favorite song on that record, and it clocks in at 5 minutes.

I also like Tool.

And Reflektor, for 5 minutes, anyway, was quite good.

So it's not the length, necessarily.

Really it's the vocals more than anything else.