Page 4 of 9

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Thu October 31, 2013 4:17 pm
by Kevin Davis
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to?
Why do people ask this question? They have two albums--just listen for yourself and find out!




There are a number of comments on page 2 that question how one could find something so inoffensive and unremarkable so deserving of hatred, and I get that. But there has always just been some "it" factor about this band that has been particularly grating to me--a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords--I'm certainly pro-crazed abandon but give me a rock band that can actually make some noise. And I'd turn a blind eye to all of that if I thought their songs were any good, but I find them to be all fireworks and pomp. They are one of my least favorite major acts of the last 10 years.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Thu October 31, 2013 4:21 pm
by matt reeder
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote: There are a number of comments on page 2 that question how one could find something so inoffensive and unremarkable so deserving of hatred, and I get that. But there has always just been some "it" factor about this band that has been particularly grating to me--a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords--I'm certainly pro-crazed abandon but give me a rock band that can actually make some noise. And I'd turn a blind eye to all of that if I thought their songs were any good, but I find them to be all fireworks and pomp. They are one of my least favorite major acts of the last 10 years.
You just summarized everything I hate about this band better than I ever could have. :thumbsup:

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Thu October 31, 2013 4:29 pm
by harmless
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to?
Why do people ask this question? They have two albums--just listen for yourself and find out!




There are a number of comments on page 2 that question how one could find something so inoffensive and unremarkable so deserving of hatred, and I get that. But there has always just been some "it" factor about this band that has been particularly grating to me--a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords--I'm certainly pro-crazed abandon but give me a rock band that can actually make some noise. And I'd turn a blind eye to all of that if I thought their songs were any good, but I find them to be all fireworks and pomp. They are one of my least favorite major acts of the last 10 years.
I remember watching them play live on TV for the first time. At the time I was a big fan of their first album (still am, to an extent) so I was up for it. But as soon as I realised they played everything too fast, too excitedly, and in a way that geed up the crowd to ecstatic, frenzied levels, I found them to be an awkward mix of quaintly-British folk band and overly-emotional stadium rock band, and not incredibly successful at either thing. Jacks of all trades, masters of none. So their name seems appropriate.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Thu October 31, 2013 6:27 pm
by stip
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to?
Why do people ask this question? They have two albums--just listen for yourself and find out!
I have trouble working while I listen to music, unfortunately, and incredibly limited windows for listening to music. So I want to make sure the chances of a long term payoff are higher than usual.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Fri November 01, 2013 12:07 am
by Stickman
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to? The first page said no, but then some of the defenders showed up.
Def worth listening. First album is solid, 2nd has a lil slower pace but still great.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Fri November 01, 2013 1:38 am
by fishbob
Stickman wrote:
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to? The first page said no, but then some of the defenders showed up.
Def worth listening. First album is solid, 2nd has a lil slower pace but still great.
I would say no. There are plenty of bands that do this type of music a billion times better.
They're possibly the most repetitive bands I've ever listened to and they have dreadful lyrics.
I saw them live last year and what was surprising was that the songs that they used their "schtick" on were easily the worst. A few of the songs utilised a full kit/band set-up and they were 100x more interesting, diverse and exciting. I don't see why they don't stick to that some more.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Fri November 01, 2013 7:38 am
by harmless
I pretty much have the opposite opinion; I find their "rock" songs involving the whole kit to be the most generic.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Sat November 02, 2013 11:15 am
by fishbob
Either way, they're not very good

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Sat November 02, 2013 2:03 pm
by epilogue
I LOVE them. Their first album. Still one of my favorites. And I enjoy their second one.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Sat November 02, 2013 10:11 pm
by red calzolaio
Listen to their music every once in awhile.

Seeing them live this summer was very underwhelming though.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Sat November 02, 2013 10:34 pm
by Soma.
stip wrote:...a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords...
I laughed way too hard at this.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Sat November 02, 2013 10:41 pm
by Stickman
red calzolaio wrote:
Seeing them live this summer was very underwhelming though.

Just the opposite for me. They had the energy of a young PJ in them and the crowd was bouncin like Tiesto was on stage.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Sun March 01, 2015 8:52 pm
by Stickman

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Mon March 02, 2015 9:06 pm
by Stickman
At the end of 2013 we went our separate ways to pursue our individual passions - be it playing professional football, getting into the catering industry, becoming an it-boy - and with each of our new careers quickly spiralling into bankruptcy and public disgrace, we had no choice but to reconvene and make a new album. So we spent 2014 writing and recording this record.

It's been a liberating and unifying experience for us as a band, and we're proud of what's come out. It was about songs, first and foremost. And then of course the sound we felt supported those songs best, which is what you will hear. We spent some time with our friend Aaron Dessner in New York (the album was half written in NY and half in London) then brought it to Mr Producer, James Ford. It was fun. Anyway, here it is... Our 3rd album.

Image
4th May 2015


Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Mon March 02, 2015 10:54 pm
by Kevin Davis
I wish bands would do away with this practice of announcing a "hiatus" just to account for the normal amount of time most artists take between albums anyway.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Mon March 02, 2015 10:59 pm
by Strat
Yea this is bullshit. I thought for certain they were going away forever.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Mon March 02, 2015 11:35 pm
by BurtReynolds
It probably gets tiresome being constantly asked when the next album is coming out, though.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Mon March 02, 2015 11:55 pm
by BDB
no banjo, no kick drum on this.
So at the very least it wont be Sigh no More III

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Mon March 02, 2015 11:57 pm
by Jorge
Stickman wrote:
So they're just Coldplay now

Re: Mumford & Sons

Posted: Tue March 03, 2015 12:01 am
by Alex
almost every man in nashville aged 18-35 looks like a member of mumford and sons