Do any of you PJ naysayers...

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

Coach wrote:
stip wrote:
Heathen wrote:LOL

so which one is it, the media is fabricating the downfall or their critical reception is better now?

you apologists need to get your story straight

different apologists, different stories
Stip, what do you think of R.E.M.'s "The Apologist?" It's now in my head.

it may very well be the REM song I like the least.

My wife and I danced to at my most beautiful at our wedding, and when we would practice it I'd always hear the first 10 seconds of the apologist before I went over to stop the song.

I already didn't like it, but that made it worse.

You?
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
Coach wrote:
stip wrote:
Heathen wrote:LOL

so which one is it, the media is fabricating the downfall or their critical reception is better now?

you apologists need to get your story straight

different apologists, different stories
Stip, what do you think of R.E.M.'s "The Apologist?" It's now in my head.
Its on Up so he probably hates it.
half of up is really awesome
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

Lament wrote:
stip wrote:Shouldn't you be comparing those songs you listed to The End, Parachutes, Just Breathe, Man of the Hour, Come Back, Speed of Sound, etc?

Plus pearl jam always had songs like Supersonic. That's not new. Remember Mankind?
I didn't compare those songs to The End/Parachutes/Man of the Hour/etc. because the OP's original sentiment (which I now see was in reference to live performances and not studio output) appeared to be that "naysayers" biggest problem was too high of a value on old, manic material and a dismissal of current, mature material. I used those sets of songs because I actually think that's fundamentally incorrect; the majority of "naysayers" place the highest premium on pre-2003 mature material and the lowest on post-2003 manic material. The most derided post-2003 material has always seemed to be the "hey look, we still rock!" stuff, not stuff like Man of the Hour or Parachutes or The End. Is anyone complaining that they don't "rock" anymore? It seems to me like "naysayers" would probably prefer the band put less of a premium on trying to prove they can still "rock."

To compare Immortality/Off He Goes/All Those Yesterdays/etc. to The End/Parachutes/Just Breathe would be appropriate if it seemed the OP's original sentiment appeared to be about the quality of material from pre-2003 vs. post-2003, but it appeared to be about the style of the music preferred by "naysayers," and therefore seemed to be a very backward assessment of what "naysayers" expected stylistically from this band. While "naysayers" might raise flags to the actual quality of a song like Just Breathe or Come Back or The End, and I don't think any of them are either surprised that the band is making music that sounds like those songs or wishes that they wouldn't or thinks that they could be improved if they rocked more. As I pointed out in my second post, I think most "naysayers" would actually say with regards to almost any album that the best moments are usually the more mature pieces and the most derided/dismissed at the manic, rocking numbers. This is a band who's mature side was embraced pretty early on, dating back to stuff like Oceans/Indifference/Nothingman/Immortality/etc.

okay, fair enough. I didn't follow that in your posts.

Still, the stuff you flagged are some of their weakest songs in the past decade, and hardly emblematic of the good 'we can still rock' songs. They're the first decade equivalent of soon forget or I'm open.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by Lament »

stip wrote:Still, the stuff you flagged are some of their weakest songs in the past decade, and hardly emblematic of the good 'we can still rock' songs. They're the first decade equivalent of soon forget or I'm open.
Big Wave always struck me as a retread of Do The Evolution. I'm not sure what I think Supersonic or Ole descend from. I don't know that I think songs like that have a true precedent in the PJ catalog. Song like Whipping and Blood are too self-righteous to compare them to, and Lukin at least has a narrative. Even Soon Forget and I'm Open have more of a narrative than Supersonic or Ole. Maybe All Night, but even that has what at the time would have been covering some new ground for them (specifically all of the vocal layering in the latter part of the song).

You know what, I think your comparison may actually be better than I thought. Pre-2003 Pearl Jam probably felt a need to show depth for sake the sake of depth at times, and that probably manifested itself in the Soon Forgets and I'm Opens of the catalog. Post-2003 Pearl Jam would probably have the opposite insecurity and feel the need "rock for the sake of rocking," hence the Supersonics and Oles. So I can get on board with linking those songs to a certain extent.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by Coach »

stip wrote:
Coach wrote:
stip wrote:
Heathen wrote:LOL

so which one is it, the media is fabricating the downfall or their critical reception is better now?

you apologists need to get your story straight

different apologists, different stories
Stip, what do you think of R.E.M.'s "The Apologist?" It's now in my head.

it may very well be the REM song I like the least.

My wife and I danced to at my most beautiful at our wedding, and when we would practice it I'd always hear the first 10 seconds of the apologist before I went over to stop the song.

I already didn't like it, but that made it worse.

You?
It's a 2.5 star song for me...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

i might give it a 2, but since there's only a handful of REM songs i don't like a lot it really stands out.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

Lament wrote:
stip wrote:Still, the stuff you flagged are some of their weakest songs in the past decade, and hardly emblematic of the good 'we can still rock' songs. They're the first decade equivalent of soon forget or I'm open.
Big Wave always struck me as a retread of Do The Evolution. I'm not sure what I think Supersonic or Ole descend from. I don't know that I think songs like that have a true precedent in the PJ catalog. Song like Whipping and Blood are too self-righteous to compare them to, and Lukin at least has a narrative. Even Soon Forget and I'm Open have more of a narrative than Supersonic or Ole. Maybe All Night, but even that has what at the time would have been covering some new ground for them (specifically all of the vocal layering in the latter part of the song).

You know what, I think your comparison may actually be better than I thought. Pre-2003 Pearl Jam probably felt a need to show depth for sake the sake of depth at times, and that probably manifested itself in the Soon Forgets and I'm Opens of the catalog. Post-2003 Pearl Jam would probably have the opposite insecurity and feel the need "rock for the sake of rocking," hence the Supersonics and Oles. So I can get on board with linking those songs to a certain extent.

You, Leatherman, and Mankind all seem like they anticipate Supersonic or Ole or Big Wave (which other than the fact that they are enviornmentalish I don't think has much in common with DTE). Even all night, I suppose, although that song is vastly superior to the rest. So those songs dont' feel new to me, although I don't know why they feel the need to include big wave or supersonic on a record (I felt that way about Mankind too). Ole, to be fair, is a one off track (assuming it is not on the album).

So I guess I don't see that pearl jam is including songs that show off their ability to rock. If that was the point than a song like GSMF certainly demonstrates that more than Supersonic. For some baffling reason they want those songs there.

You could make the case, obviously, that pearl jam shouldn't be writing loud and aggressive songs anymore because they can't pull them off (I disagree, but that's irrelevant). But that's a much bigger net than Ole and Supersonic. Then you're pulling in GSMF, Got Some, Life Wasted, Comatose, WWS, etc. And those are some excellent songs.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by Heathen »

I would put these songs in the Ole/Supersonic net in a heartbeat. I might save Got Some if I'm feeling generous.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by Lament »

stip wrote:
Lament wrote:
stip wrote:Still, the stuff you flagged are some of their weakest songs in the past decade, and hardly emblematic of the good 'we can still rock' songs. They're the first decade equivalent of soon forget or I'm open.
Big Wave always struck me as a retread of Do The Evolution. I'm not sure what I think Supersonic or Ole descend from. I don't know that I think songs like that have a true precedent in the PJ catalog. Song like Whipping and Blood are too self-righteous to compare them to, and Lukin at least has a narrative. Even Soon Forget and I'm Open have more of a narrative than Supersonic or Ole. Maybe All Night, but even that has what at the time would have been covering some new ground for them (specifically all of the vocal layering in the latter part of the song).

You know what, I think your comparison may actually be better than I thought. Pre-2003 Pearl Jam probably felt a need to show depth for sake the sake of depth at times, and that probably manifested itself in the Soon Forgets and I'm Opens of the catalog. Post-2003 Pearl Jam would probably have the opposite insecurity and feel the need "rock for the sake of rocking," hence the Supersonics and Oles. So I can get on board with linking those songs to a certain extent.

You, Leatherman, and Mankind all seem like they anticipate Supersonic or Ole or Big Wave (which other than the fact that they are enviornmentalish I don't think has much in common with DTE). Even all night, I suppose, although that song is vastly superior to the rest. So those songs dont' feel new to me, although I don't know why they feel the need to include big wave or supersonic on a record (I felt that way about Mankind too). Ole, to be fair, is a one off track (assuming it is not on the album).

So I guess I don't see that pearl jam is including songs that show off their ability to rock. If that was the point than a song like GSMF certainly demonstrates that more than Supersonic. For some baffling reason they want those songs there.

You could make the case, obviously, that pearl jam shouldn't be writing loud and aggressive songs anymore because they can't pull them off (I disagree, but that's irrelevant). But that's a much bigger net than Ole and Supersonic. Then you're pulling in GSMF, Got Some, Life Wasted, Comatose, WWS, etc. And those are some excellent songs.
Mankind always seemed a precedent to Do The Evolution to me; a snarky song that showed that had a point but made it by being clever instead of superserious (in that way I see it as a descendant of Rats). That's the same way in which I see Big Wave as being part of the same lineage as DTE. I feel like Green Disease is a song that was begging to go in that same direction, but Ed just couldn't keep himself from being overwrought.

I wouldn't necessarily make the case that Pearl Jam shouldn't be writing loud & aggressive songs anymore at all, but I would make the case that they're no longer a strong enough band to approach these types of songs head on. WWS has very tame verses which make the chorus seem much rowdier than it really is by comparison. I'd put it closer to Corduroy as a pop song in disguise more than anything else. Got Some has a really unique interplay between Jeff & Matt during the verses so to a certain extent it works for me. GSMF, Supersonic, Ole, You, Leatherman, all of these miss the mark for me for that very reason; I don't see them as having much character at all (Mankind seems quirky enough to me to avoid being in this group, but Don't Gimme No Lip would definitely belong in this group). If the band still genuinely enjoys writing and performing material like this then more power to them; I don't see it as adding anything meaningful to their catalog though. I don't know, I guess I just don't think this band has ever found a convincing way to be carefree or fun, which is a really important thing when you're trying to pull off the kind of straight-on rockers in question this deep into their career.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

A song like GSMF has the ragged grit that I think makes these contemporary fast songs compelling, and deals with more 'serious' subject matter. Supersonic and Ole have that glossy feel to them (that I really don't like), which is how I'm distinguishing (personally) those different types of fast songs. It is what makes Brain of J different from Leatherman or Grievance different from Hitchhiker
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

stip wrote:A song like GSMF has the ragged grit that I think makes these contemporary fast songs compelling, and deals with more 'serious' subject matter. Supersonic and Ole have that glossy feel to them (that I really don't like), which is how I'm distinguishing (personally) those different types of fast songs. It is what makes Brain of J different from Leatherman or Grievance different from Hitchhiker
They are more grittier, I AGREE
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by darth_vedder »

If PJ is gonna "rock" I'd rather them rock more like "Insignificance" than "Ole". I really liked the direction they were on with Binaural. RA was a let down for me, although I like it more with age. S/T is alright, and has some strong songs, but I don't really love it. It, and BS could make one really good album.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

darth_vedder wrote:If PJ is gonna "rock" I'd rather them rock more like "Insignificance" than "Ole". I really liked the direction they were on with Binaural. RA was a let down for me, although I like it more with age. S/T is alright, and has some strong songs, but I don't really love it. It, and BS could make one really good album.

Ole still strikes me as a bit of an outlier (I agree with you, btw). But I'd be perfectly happy with more GSMF, Johnny Guitars, and Comatoses.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by McParadigm »

darth_vedder wrote:S/T...and BS could make one really good album.
One very surrealist painting, that.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by EJ »

With better production, there'd be a great Pearl Jam EP within S/T, but that's about it.

I can't give that nod to B/S though. Just not a strong band effort. Maybe, there'd be a decent Ed solo EP in there though: Just Breathe, Unthought Known, Speed of Sound (demo), and The End.

I wouldn't dare combine these albums though.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by stip »

Gonna See My Friend
Life Wasted
Got Some
Word Wide Suicide
Comatose
The Fixer
Johnny Guitar
Just Breathe
Severed Hand
Marker in the Sand
Parachutes
Force of Nature
Army Reserve
Come Back
Wasted Reprise
The End


Conceptually I couldn't tell you much about this album but I think it would sound great
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

I agree. Cannot combine them. One is good (ST) and the other is crap
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by bada »

stip wrote:Gonna See My Friend
Life Wasted
Got Some
Word Wide Suicide
Comatose
The Fixer
Johnny Guitar
Just Breathe
Severed Hand
Marker in the Sand
Parachutes
Force of Nature
Army Reserve
Come Back
Wasted Reprise
The End


Conceptually I couldn't tell you much about this album but I think it would sound great

I've made mixes of my favorite songs off those two albums and combined them and they go together pretty good.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by bodysnatcher »

i made a mix of my favorite songs from those two albums, and it turned out to be shorter than Backspacer
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Do any of you PJ naysayers...

Post by Lament »

bodysnatcher wrote:i made a mix of my favorite songs from those two albums, and it turned out to be shorter than Backspacer
Was it shorter than Merkinball?
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
Post Reply