Re: Film: Tenet (8-27-20)
Posted: Fri January 01, 2021 11:23 pm
Yea maybe this just wasn’t good.
Nolan’s ego. That should be his next movie
Nolan’s ego. That should be his next movie
I think I missed that.spike wrote:The wacky Nolan stuff wasn’t enough to overcome the lack of any interesting character development. Pattinson being the woman’s son is sort of interesting I guess.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
I might watch again, but my main problem is one that others have already posted about:E.H. Ruddock wrote:I watched again and don’t think i understand the logic of it all
I read a summary of the movie.elliseamos wrote:I might watch again, but my main problem is one that others have already posted about:E.H. Ruddock wrote:I watched again and don’t think i understand the logic of it all
If it supposedly can't change the future why would the future go to such lengths to change the past?
I just watched the movie. And I've only seen it once. And I haven't read any articles yet. But... I think (?) that's what all the parallel universe stuff was about. I don't fully get it. But I think that's why that stuff is in there, to explain the paradox away.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Ok, after sleeping on this for a night:
I watch and read a lot of stuff on time travel theory, so I'm not the best person to speak to this because all that has done is made my feeble brain confused. But, the future people want to destroy the current day people because we fucked up the planet. At least according to Sator. Also, the future people believe the in the theory that changing their past wont' affect their present, right? Like, if I kill your grandfather in the past, that won't make you disappear in the present. With that being said, wouldn't that apply to everything? So if they destroy the past, their planet being fucked up in the future isn't going to change.