Re: new (old) song: Let it Ride
Posted: Tue July 23, 2013 8:22 pm
I moved from It's Alright to Meh. I'm glad they scrapped this one. Eddie's got his super whiny voice on for this one.
I feel like this song could be a single. It's not The Fixer, but it's certainly more catchy and accessible than some of the stuff they've released over the years.BurtReynolds wrote: Thats definitely a big part of it, but I think they could get away with a lot of the production glossiness if the underlying songs had more meat on them. They've seemingly had a great desire to trim the fat and simplify many of their new songs. I like the fat. Some people don't like the somewhat meandering, jammy side of the band, but I love it.
BurtReynolds wrote:Thats definitely a big part of it, but I think they could get away with a lot of the production glossiness if the underlying songs had more meat on them. They've seemingly had a great desire to trim the fat and simplify many of their new songs. I like the fat. Some people don't like the somewhat meandering, jammy side of the band, but I love it.stip wrote:IlluminEddie wrote:Yup.stip wrote:that's true, and the song is the song. But there were more than a few comments somewhere in this avalanche where people were remarking on how great they tracks felt/sounded (the 5 guys playing in a room) that I think reflects the rawer, unmastered feel of these songs. I can very easily imagine people soured on backspacer's production, for instance, enjoying the unmastered versions of those songs more. Will they become their favorite songs? Of course not. Will it make a difference? it might.Heathen wrote:I don't really make a distinction. A song is what a song sounds like. Not what the sheet looks like. At least to me. Now I know what you mean of course, so would I like Life Wasted, Unemployable, The Fixer or WWS with a different production? Probably not, unless it was produced in a way that makes the lyrics unhearable.stip wrote:These feel unmastered to me. I really wonder how much of people's issues with later day pearl jam really come down to production--issues with how the songs feel due to their presentation, rather than the writing itself.
In my limited time here over the years, I think RM is known for it's hipster-style remarks. I think that's what you're getting at and I agree. If it's "not released", there's more incentive here to like it because that's the hipster thing to do
to clarify, that was definitely not my point. It's not that these songs were rare that matters. They feel rawer or unprocessed/unmastered. So you can hear the actual song in a purer form. And I think that's attractive to a lot of people--especially since the mastering on the last two albums (of which I am one of the most, if not the most, vocal defenders) does leave something to be desired.
digster wrote:I feel like this song could be a single. It's not The Fixer, but it's certainly more catchy and accessible than some of the stuff they've released over the years.BurtReynolds wrote: Thats definitely a big part of it, but I think they could get away with a lot of the production glossiness if the underlying songs had more meat on them. They've seemingly had a great desire to trim the fat and simplify many of their new songs. I like the fat. Some people don't like the somewhat meandering, jammy side of the band, but I love it.
It's the groove man. The groove!digster wrote:Fair enough...I mean, something's catchy or not to a person. I just think if I was able to remember that part after hearing it once or twice it could certainly have that effect on others.

Yup. I liked that band for a while.stip wrote:that's a good song.
I doubt it would go anywhere as a single, but I could say that about most of these songs.stip wrote:digster wrote:I feel like this song could be a single. It's not The Fixer, but it's certainly more catchy and accessible than some of the stuff they've released over the years.BurtReynolds wrote: Thats definitely a big part of it, but I think they could get away with a lot of the production glossiness if the underlying songs had more meat on them. They've seemingly had a great desire to trim the fat and simplify many of their new songs. I like the fat. Some people don't like the somewhat meandering, jammy side of the band, but I love it.
really? I've listened to this thing like 10 times today and for all this songs strengths or weaknesses catchiness is far from the list. Truth be told I can't remember how it goes until it starts.
stip wrote:Cold Confession is great, but it sure isn't designed for the radio.