Red Mosquito

i'm still not sold. campbell is still prone to make ridiculous decisions in close games, they need to be tested in bad weather, and they're the lions ffs.

spike wrote:i'm still not sold. campbell is still prone to make ridiculous decisions in close games, they need to be tested in bad weather, and they're the lions ffs.

This is a ridiculous take. Name one call that Campbell has made that has cost them this year. You’re putting too much stock in the NFC Championship game last year. For every bad decision that he has supposedly made, he’s made 5 that have put them in positions to win that have succeeded. I mean, I suppose he could be like Todd Bowles.

Also, why do they have to be tested in bad weather? Is the Super Bowl being played in Montana or something?

edit: the game where they dominated the Packers in Green Bay this year was terrible weather. Funny, but the team that couldn’t handle it wasn’t Detroit.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:i'm still not sold. campbell is still prone to make ridiculous decisions in close games, they need to be tested in bad weather, and they're the lions ffs.

This is a ridiculous take. Name one call that Campbell has made that has cost them this year. You’re putting too much stock in the NFC Championship game last year. For every bad decision that he has supposedly made, he’s made 5 that have put them in positions to win that have succeeded. I mean, I suppose he could be like Todd Bowles.

Also, why do they have to be tested in bad weather? Is the Super Bowl being played in Montana or something?

edit: the game where they dominated the Packers in Green Bay this year was terrible weather. Funny, but the team that couldn’t handle it wasn’t Detroit.

Too easy.

went to the game today in indy. stadium was pretty cool, but those colts unis were sweet; i’m not sure why they don’t wear those more often.

weird game all around - lions were never really in jeopardy of losing, but it felt like they never could quite get going. i think the main thing that could set them back is injuries — they’re starting to pile up.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:i'm still not sold. campbell is still prone to make ridiculous decisions in close games, they need to be tested in bad weather, and they're the lions ffs.

This is a ridiculous take. Name one call that Campbell has made that has cost them this year. You’re putting too much stock in the NFC Championship game last year. For every bad decision that he has supposedly made, he’s made 5 that have put them in positions to win that have succeeded. I mean, I suppose he could be like Todd Bowles.

Also, why do they have to be tested in bad weather? Is the Super Bowl being played in Montana or something?

edit: the game where they dominated the Packers in Green Bay this year was terrible weather. Funny, but the team that couldn’t handle it wasn’t Detroit.

glad to see you're coming your senses

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 4#p2138464

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:i'm still not sold. campbell is still prone to make ridiculous decisions in close games, they need to be tested in bad weather, and they're the lions ffs.

This is a ridiculous take. Name one call that Campbell has made that has cost them this year. You’re putting too much stock in the NFC Championship game last year. For every bad decision that he has supposedly made, he’s made 5 that have put them in positions to win that have succeeded. I mean, I suppose he could be like Todd Bowles.

Also, why do they have to be tested in bad weather? Is the Super Bowl being played in Montana or something?

edit: the game where they dominated the Packers in Green Bay this year was terrible weather. Funny, but the team that couldn’t handle it wasn’t Detroit.

glad to see you're coming your senses

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 4#p2138464

It has nothing to do with talent. The lions are missing 7 starters on defense and 14 players overall.

Nice trolling though.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:i'm still not sold. campbell is still prone to make ridiculous decisions in close games, they need to be tested in bad weather, and they're the lions ffs.

This is a ridiculous take. Name one call that Campbell has made that has cost them this year. You’re putting too much stock in the NFC Championship game last year. For every bad decision that he has supposedly made, he’s made 5 that have put them in positions to win that have succeeded. I mean, I suppose he could be like Todd Bowles.

Also, why do they have to be tested in bad weather? Is the Super Bowl being played in Montana or something?

edit: the game where they dominated the Packers in Green Bay this year was terrible weather. Funny, but the team that couldn’t handle it wasn’t Detroit.

glad to see you're coming your senses

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 4#p2138464

It has nothing to do with talent. The lions are missing 7 starters on defense and 14 players overall.

Nice trolling though.

next man up

ugggg . . . like I was saying . . .

It’s just like my fantasy team.

Dan Campbell has balls of steel.

Nice to have to wait until week 14 to clinch a playoff spot after starting 12-1. Jesus this division.

AAAANNNNNNDDDDDD now David Montgomery's more than likely lost for the season with an MCL injury.

The injuries are now unsustainable. So long 2024 season. It looked so promising.

and ladies and gentlemen, now appreciate my life as a fan of the detroit lions.

sorry...go broncos

i shall get on the broncos train from here on out

Chris_H_2 wrote:i shall get on the broncos train from here on out

Wtf man. You need to come Bake with us!

I’m sorry but we need a Chris vs Chris Super Bowl

Mecca wrote:I’m sorry but we need a Chris vs Chris Super Bowl

agreed. i would put $100 on Chris

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:i shall get on the broncos train from here on out

Wtf man. You need to come Bake with us!

the bucs and rams are two teams that i wouldn't be surprised come out of the NFC