Eerily prescient post.stip wrote:I think I'd love Just Breathe if Russel Crowe covered it
PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
- lvc
- Huge WNBA Fan
- Posts: 959
- Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
- Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
stip wrote:I think I'd love Just Breathe if Russel Crowe covered it
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36483
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
i pretty much listed my least favorite pearl jam songs and artists that would make them better. it would be cool to hear QOTSA cover "Go", but I'm not going to like it more than pearl jam doing it. on the other hand, "Lightening Bolt" sucks, but Bad Religion doing it might make me like it more.Jorge wrote:How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
There are a lot of Pearl Jam songs that I like and would love to hear another artist tackle. What I'm looking at here are songs that Pearl Jam wrote that I don't really love or that don't totally work for me, and that sound to my ears like they could actually be covers. Songs that are similar to styles/strengths that I value in other artists' work, but that Pearl Jam aren't credibly pulling off in a way that's as satisfying to me as they would be had that other artist written the song.Jorge wrote:How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
Does that make sense?
I don't know. Maybe there isn't really a functional difference, but in my mind there is. But I like people doing whatever they want with this thread/topic. It's a little fluid and open to interpretation and I'm cool with just seeing what other people make of it, too.
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
The Cramps - Gonna See My Friend
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40165
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
Since you hate Habit, how about Black Sabbath doing it?epilogue wrote:There are a lot of Pearl Jam songs that I like and would love to hear another artist tackle. What I'm looking at here are songs that Pearl Jam wrote that I don't really love or that don't totally work for me, and that sound to my ears like they could actually be covers. Songs that are similar to styles/strengths that I value in other artists' work, but that Pearl Jam aren't credibly pulling off in a way that's as satisfying to me as they would be had that other artist written the song.Jorge wrote:How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
Does that make sense?
I don't know. Maybe there isn't really a functional difference, but in my mind there is. But I like people doing whatever they want with this thread/topic. It's a little fluid and open to interpretation and I'm cool with just seeing what other people make of it, too.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
i take it backwarehouse wrote:good call!bodysnatcher wrote:Imagining Jack White doing a sped up bluesy version of "Half Full"warehouse wrote: 1/2 full-jack white
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
I don't know much Sabbath outside of the mega-hits. Is Habit a Sabbath style song?wease wrote:Since you hate Habit, how about Black Sabbath doing it?epilogue wrote:There are a lot of Pearl Jam songs that I like and would love to hear another artist tackle. What I'm looking at here are songs that Pearl Jam wrote that I don't really love or that don't totally work for me, and that sound to my ears like they could actually be covers. Songs that are similar to styles/strengths that I value in other artists' work, but that Pearl Jam aren't credibly pulling off in a way that's as satisfying to me as they would be had that other artist written the song.Jorge wrote:How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
Does that make sense?
I don't know. Maybe there isn't really a functional difference, but in my mind there is. But I like people doing whatever they want with this thread/topic. It's a little fluid and open to interpretation and I'm cool with just seeing what other people make of it, too.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
This is a great onedigster wrote:The Cramps - Gonna See My Friend
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36483
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
It's a little too fast and thrashy but early Sabbath riffs are similarly heavy and use the tritone and dissonant intervals, which "Habit" does a lotepilogue wrote:I don't know much Sabbath outside of the mega-hits. Is Habit a Sabbath style song?wease wrote:Since you hate Habit, how about Black Sabbath doing it?epilogue wrote:There are a lot of Pearl Jam songs that I like and would love to hear another artist tackle. What I'm looking at here are songs that Pearl Jam wrote that I don't really love or that don't totally work for me, and that sound to my ears like they could actually be covers. Songs that are similar to styles/strengths that I value in other artists' work, but that Pearl Jam aren't credibly pulling off in a way that's as satisfying to me as they would be had that other artist written the song.Jorge wrote:How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
Does that make sense?
I don't know. Maybe there isn't really a functional difference, but in my mind there is. But I like people doing whatever they want with this thread/topic. It's a little fluid and open to interpretation and I'm cool with just seeing what other people make of it, too.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
Interesting. Then, yeah, maybe that would be a good example of what I'm talking about in this thread. Maybe a Sabbath 'Habit' would be pretty cool.Jorge wrote:It's a little too fast and thrashy but early Sabbath riffs are similarly heavy and use the tritone and dissonant intervals, which "Habit" does a lotepilogue wrote:I don't know much Sabbath outside of the mega-hits. Is Habit a Sabbath style song?wease wrote:Since you hate Habit, how about Black Sabbath doing it?epilogue wrote:There are a lot of Pearl Jam songs that I like and would love to hear another artist tackle. What I'm looking at here are songs that Pearl Jam wrote that I don't really love or that don't totally work for me, and that sound to my ears like they could actually be covers. Songs that are similar to styles/strengths that I value in other artists' work, but that Pearl Jam aren't credibly pulling off in a way that's as satisfying to me as they would be had that other artist written the song.Jorge wrote:How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
Does that make sense?
I don't know. Maybe there isn't really a functional difference, but in my mind there is. But I like people doing whatever they want with this thread/topic. It's a little fluid and open to interpretation and I'm cool with just seeing what other people make of it, too.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40165
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
“Maybe?” pfftepilogue wrote:Interesting. Then, yeah, maybe that would be a good example of what I'm talking about in this thread. Maybe a Sabbath 'Habit' would be pretty cool.Jorge wrote:It's a little too fast and thrashy but early Sabbath riffs are similarly heavy and use the tritone and dissonant intervals, which "Habit" does a lotepilogue wrote:I don't know much Sabbath outside of the mega-hits. Is Habit a Sabbath style song?wease wrote:Since you hate Habit, how about Black Sabbath doing it?epilogue wrote:There are a lot of Pearl Jam songs that I like and would love to hear another artist tackle. What I'm looking at here are songs that Pearl Jam wrote that I don't really love or that don't totally work for me, and that sound to my ears like they could actually be covers. Songs that are similar to styles/strengths that I value in other artists' work, but that Pearl Jam aren't credibly pulling off in a way that's as satisfying to me as they would be had that other artist written the song.Jorge wrote:How do you differentiate between "PJ songs that I'd like to hear covered by other artists" vs. "PJ songs that I'd like more if they were originals by other artists"? I can feel that there's a difference but I can't quite pinpoint it. The end result would likely be functionally the same
Does that make sense?
I don't know. Maybe there isn't really a functional difference, but in my mind there is. But I like people doing whatever they want with this thread/topic. It's a little fluid and open to interpretation and I'm cool with just seeing what other people make of it, too.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
The Beatles doing Can’t keep
They’d have so much fun with that
They’d have so much fun with that
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35444
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
"Amongst the Waves" by Steve Roach or somebody. Stretch that mf'er out into an ambient drone piece so that is completely unrecognizable from the original.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
bodysnatcher wrote:"Amongst the Waves" by Steve Roach or somebody. Stretch that mf'er out into an ambient drone piece so that is completely unrecognizable from the original.
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
Supersonic — Weezer
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42757
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: PJ Songs You'd Like More If They Were By Another Artist
Take The Long Way - Soundgarden , WWC or Hater
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.