Page 4 of 4
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Fri January 23, 2026 8:55 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Bammer wrote:No gotcha attempts.
Everyone invokes orange man on everything. At least here in Seattle. So frustrating.
Anyway, just burn it all down.
Hurry. Fkn. Comet.
But you are the one wondering why a "common" murder is buried in the newsfeed but the Renee Good one is all over. It is because of the orange man. He is why she was murdered. So you did invoke yam tits. If you deny that she was murdered because of Trump, then yeah, I don't know what to tell you.
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Fri January 23, 2026 9:10 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Fri January 23, 2026 9:12 pm
by spike
It’s cool bammer doesn’t think the government murdering someone in the street is big news. That’s the kind of compliance dictators count on when they take over.
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Fri January 23, 2026 9:12 pm
by B
I don't know why we're claiming these had no coverage. I had to google Iryna Zarutska's name, but I'd seen the story over and over in 2025.
Most of that was people on social media blaming the Democrats for her murderer not being in jail. I'm not sure what Democrat was to blame.
Police arrest people, and those people either get convicted and serve a sentence or they don't get convicted due to lack of evidence.
There's no system for permanently locking up people who habitually commit misdemeanors, especially when some of those are convictions and some of them are not.
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Fri January 23, 2026 9:34 pm
by Dev
yeah yeah orange man bad we fuckin get it
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Fri January 23, 2026 11:56 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Sat January 24, 2026 4:25 pm
by Bammer
B wrote:I don't know why we're claiming these had no coverage. I had to google Iryna Zarutska's name, but I'd seen the story over and over in 2025.
Most of that was people on social media blaming the Democrats for her murderer not being in jail. I'm not sure what Democrat was to blame.
Police arrest people, and those people either get convicted and serve a sentence or they don't get convicted due to lack of evidence.
There's no system for permanently locking up people who habitually commit misdemeanors, especially when some of those are convictions and some of them are not.
Your thought on this general premise?:
When convicted, sentences should be (much) longer for habitual repeat offenders.
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Sat January 24, 2026 7:54 pm
by B
Bammer wrote:B wrote:I don't know why we're claiming these had no coverage. I had to google Iryna Zarutska's name, but I'd seen the story over and over in 2025.
Most of that was people on social media blaming the Democrats for her murderer not being in jail. I'm not sure what Democrat was to blame.
Police arrest people, and those people either get convicted and serve a sentence or they don't get convicted due to lack of evidence.
There's no system for permanently locking up people who habitually commit misdemeanors, especially when some of those are convictions and some of them are not.
Your thought on this general premise?:
When convicted, sentences should be (much) longer for habitual repeat offenders.
I don't think longer sentences is going to do much. The longer you leave a mentally disabled person in prison, the more violent they're going to be. You can't keep them forever, b/c a life sentence for assault is beyond cruel.
We're going to need more robust choices that allow for mental and emotional rehabilitation. As long as prisons are a place where we warehouse the violent, sick, and indigent together in the cheapest conditions there honestly won't be a solution.
Did either of the perpetrators in these stories have social workers or were they offered services or therapy or housing or anything? I'd bet not. I bet their last time in court, the prosecutor lost the case, and they waved bye to the guy in the alley behind the jail.
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Sat January 24, 2026 10:15 pm
by epilogue
Dems - let's have a bigger safety net and social programs that can help these mentally ill people and address these issues, something other than prisons because we know that prison just exacerbates these issues.
The Right - fuck you libtard faggots! The law is the law!
The law is followed.
The Right - WHAT THE FUCK HOW COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED?! WHY AREN'T YOU IDIOTS TALKING ABOUT IT!
Dems - let's have a bigger safety net and social programs that can help these mentally ill people and address these issues, something other than prisons because we know that prison just exacerbates these issues.
The Right - FUCK YOU FAGGOT
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Sun January 25, 2026 12:29 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
Buncha fags
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Sun January 25, 2026 2:43 am
by Bammer
epilogue wrote:Dems - let's have a bigger safety net and social programs that can help these mentally ill people and address these issues, something other than prisons because we know that prison just exacerbates these issues.
The Right - fuck you libtard faggots! The law is the law!
The law is followed.
The Right - WHAT THE FUCK HOW COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED?! WHY AREN'T YOU IDIOTS TALKING ABOUT IT!
Dems - let's have a bigger safety net and social programs that can help these mentally ill people and address these issues, something other than prisons because we know that prison just exacerbates these issues.
The Right - FUCK YOU FAGGOT
I’m tracking. So are these non-prison support services mandatory?
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Sun January 25, 2026 5:03 pm
by B
Bammer wrote:epilogue wrote:Dems - let's have a bigger safety net and social programs that can help these mentally ill people and address these issues, something other than prisons because we know that prison just exacerbates these issues.
The Right - fuck you libtard faggots! The law is the law!
The law is followed.
The Right - WHAT THE FUCK HOW COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED?! WHY AREN'T YOU IDIOTS TALKING ABOUT IT!
Dems - let's have a bigger safety net and social programs that can help these mentally ill people and address these issues, something other than prisons because we know that prison just exacerbates these issues.
The Right - FUCK YOU FAGGOT
I’m tracking. So are these non-prison support services mandatory?
Sure, for people who are convicted of crimes. You can tack it onto the end of their sentences.
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Thu January 29, 2026 1:33 am
by Dev
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Buncha fags
You really delight in an opportunity to say this word, hey? Another thing you have in common with Nick Feuntes!
Re: Let’s talk about Iryna Zarutska and Jeannette Marken
Posted: Thu January 29, 2026 1:38 am
by BurtReynolds
What the heck is going on in this thread?