Page 4 of 7

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:05 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:those guys sit back and masturbate to their films while congratulating themselves on how visionary they are.
Hahaha, this is a dead-on description of how I feel about them.

And there are some directors I love that I'm sure other people feel would fall into the category I'm putting Cuaron and Innaritu into, such as Kubrick, Fellini, and Refn, but even their stuff feels natural and earned to me.
Kubrick is maybe the best example for your case, I think. I can totally get on board saying Kubrick is a masterful director with a distinct style that doesn't cast an inescapable shadow over the film itself. Kubrick and David Lynch both are guys that, I'm pretty sure are/were legit geniuses, who have expressive and distinct styles, but don't get in their own way.

I would lump Inarritu in that category, for sure. Cuaron, while I still LOVE what he does, is maybe the bridge between the two. He does get in his own way sometimes, but I think, on the balance, he finds the right choices.
That's all totally fair. Again, just agree to disagree on the quality/talent of Innaritu and Cuaron specifically. :peace:

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:06 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:those guys sit back and masturbate to their films while congratulating themselves on how visionary they are.
Hahaha, this is a dead-on description of how I feel about them.

And there are some directors I love that I'm sure other people feel would fall into the category I'm putting Cuaron and Innaritu into, such as Kubrick, Fellini, and Refn, but even their stuff feels natural and earned to me.
Kubrick is maybe the best example for your case, I think. I can totally get on board saying Kubrick is a masterful director with a distinct style that doesn't cast an inescapable shadow over the film itself. Kubrick and David Lynch both are guys that, I'm pretty sure are/were legit geniuses, who have expressive and distinct styles, but don't get in their own way.

I would lump Inarritu in that category, for sure. Cuaron, while I still LOVE what he does, is maybe the bridge between the two. He does get in his own way sometimes, but I think, on the balance, he finds the right choices.
That's all totally fair. Again, just agree to disagree on the quality/talent of Innaritu and Cuaron specifically. :peace:
Of course. Good talk, friend. I really enjoy our presence on this forum.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:18 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Hey, durd, have you ever seen The Tenant?

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:21 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Hey, durd, have you ever seen The Tenant?
I have not.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:25 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Hey, durd, have you ever seen The Tenant?
I have not.
It's fucking amazing, you should check it out. I think it's the purest representation of Polanski's style. The black comedy, the paranoia, the absurdity, the voyeurism, the psychological unease. It also helps that Polanski plays the protagonist himself. It's one of the greatest movies ever made, in my opinion (and it becomes pretty intense and profound when you consider what was going on in Polanski's personal life when he made it).

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:27 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Hey, durd, have you ever seen The Tenant?
I have not.
It's fucking amazing, you should check it out. I think it's the purest representation of Polanski's style. The black comedy, the paranoia, the absurdity, the voyeurism, the psychological unease. It also helps that Polanski plays the protagonist himself. It's one of the greatest movies ever made, in my opinion (and it becomes pretty intense and profound when you consider what was going on in Polanski's personal life when he made it).
Sold! I'll check it out as soon as I can. I've been wanting to watch more of his stuff. Seems like a solid place to start. That or The Piano, which I can't believe I still haven't seen.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:31 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Hey, durd, have you ever seen The Tenant?
I have not.
It's fucking amazing, you should check it out. I think it's the purest representation of Polanski's style. The black comedy, the paranoia, the absurdity, the voyeurism, the psychological unease. It also helps that Polanski plays the protagonist himself. It's one of the greatest movies ever made, in my opinion (and it becomes pretty intense and profound when you consider what was going on in Polanski's personal life when he made it).
Sold! I'll check it out as soon as I can. I've been wanting to watch more of his stuff. Seems like a solid place to start. That or The Piano, which I can't believe I still haven't seen.
The Pianist is great but Polanski’s style appropriately takes a bit of a step back because of the daunting material. Make no mistake: it’s still very much a Polanski movie, but…you get what I’m saying.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:32 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Oh, and be sure to let me know what you think after you watch 'em. I'm very curious to hear your opinion.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:37 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Hey, durd, have you ever seen The Tenant?
I have not.
It's fucking amazing, you should check it out. I think it's the purest representation of Polanski's style. The black comedy, the paranoia, the absurdity, the voyeurism, the psychological unease. It also helps that Polanski plays the protagonist himself. It's one of the greatest movies ever made, in my opinion (and it becomes pretty intense and profound when you consider what was going on in Polanski's personal life when he made it).
Sold! I'll check it out as soon as I can. I've been wanting to watch more of his stuff. Seems like a solid place to start. That or The Piano, which I can't believe I still haven't seen.
The Pianist is great but Polanski’s style appropriately takes a bit of a step back because of the daunting material. Make no mistake: it’s still very much a Polanski movie, but…you get what I’m saying.
Jesus, did I really write The Piano instead of The Pianist? Fuck Jesus with a garden hose on full blast, I'm sorry.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:37 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, and be sure to let me know what you think after you watch 'em. I'm very curious to hear your opinion.
Will do.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:45 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Haha, The Piano is one of the weirdest movies I've ever seen. Jane Campion is a strange one.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:48 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha, The Piano is one of the weirdest movies I've ever seen. Jane Campion is a strange one.
Totes. But not necessarily in a bad way. Did you watch Top of the Lake? I know you're not big on TV shows, but that one-shot series was fucking brilliant. And just as strange as you'd expect from Campion.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:49 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha, The Piano is one of the weirdest movies I've ever seen. Jane Campion is a strange one.
Totes. But not necessarily in a bad way. Did you watch Top of the Lake? I know you're not big on TV shows, but that one-shot series was fucking brilliant. And just as strange as you'd expect from Campion.
Oh yeah, I kind of like it. It's just really bizarre.

No, I haven't yet, but it's been in my Netflix queue forever. I gotta get on that soon.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Thu October 23, 2014 5:52 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha, The Piano is one of the weirdest movies I've ever seen. Jane Campion is a strange one.
Totes. But not necessarily in a bad way. Did you watch Top of the Lake? I know you're not big on TV shows, but that one-shot series was fucking brilliant. And just as strange as you'd expect from Campion.
Oh yeah, I kind of like it. It's just really bizarre.

No, I haven't yet, but it's been in my Netflix queue forever. I gotta get on that soon.
It's really lovely. And a good example of how TV is working its way more toward the cinematic experience. But it's weird. And flawed. But overall, I found it haunting and something I know I'll revisit.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 4:18 pm
by epilogue
Hey Vermin, do you write for The New Yorker under the name Richard Brody?

Mr. Brody did not like Birdman, and after our conversation yesterday, I imagine you'll have a similar point of view. Here's a brief snippet from his (your) review:

" ‘Birdman’ trades on facile, casual dichotomies of theatre versus cinema and art versus commerce. It’s a white elephant of a movie that conceals a mouse of timid wisdom, a mighty and churning machine of virtuosity that delivers a work of utterly familiar and unoriginal drama. Of such things, too, can Oscar buzz can be made."

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 8:48 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Haha, no, but I like Richard Brody. He's one of only two critics worth reading, I'd say (the other being Armond White). We don't always see eye to eye, though.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 8:52 pm
by Jorge
LoathedVermin72 wrote:(the other being Armond White)
OF COURSE.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 8:55 pm
by LoathedVermin72
theplatypus wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:(the other being Armond White)
OF COURSE.
Armond White changed my life. We're Facebook friends. We interact sometimes. It's no big deal.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 9:13 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Haha, no, but I like Richard Brody. He's one of only two critics worth reading, I'd say (the other being Armond White). We don't always see eye to eye, though.
Brody's review is well written and thought out. He's coming from a biased and (I think) faulty a priori assumption. So I don't agree with some of what he says. But it's a good review, even if I disagree.

Re: Film: Birdman (2014)

Posted: Fri October 24, 2014 11:45 pm
by Malloy
brody is very good. but i'm most partial to rosenbaum