UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by ridleybradout »

Stone is both the coolest and uncoolest guy in the band.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by numbers »

Boom brings something to the band, and Crazy Mary has been better since he joined.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84844
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by epilogue »

ridleybradout wrote:Stone is both the coolest and uncoolest guy in the band.
This is the Unpopular Pearl Jam Opinions thread not the Totally Fucking Duh thread.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36487
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Jorge »

numbers wrote:Boom brings something to the band, and Crazy Mary has been better since he joined.
I like the idea of Boom, but when there's a part with a slight degree of intricacy (which is to say every other keyboard part aside from the keyboard-smashing free-for-all solo in "Crazy Mary"), he can't do it. He's a klutz, a remarkably unskilled player for someone who does it at a professional level. He's ruined so many songs.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84844
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by epilogue »

Strat wrote:Sires is fucking great
Dave A is overrated and kind of obnoxious on most songs (yet totally awesome on others)
Matt Cameron is an incredible song writer and the best in the band.
Image
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by bodysnatcher »

I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Birds in Hell »

bodysnatcher wrote:I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs
:thumbsup:

On that note, my submission is that Pearl Jam shows are way too long.

Even for a band I love, somewhere in the region of 90-120 minutes (at most) is the longest I really want to hear them play live. More ≠ better.

I think the band's set length was ideal in 1998 and 2000.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by numbers »

theplatypus wrote:
numbers wrote:Boom brings something to the band, and Crazy Mary has been better since he joined.
I like the idea of Boom, but when there's a part with a slight degree of intricacy (which is to say every other keyboard part aside from the keyboard-smashing free-for-all solo in "Crazy Mary"), he can't do it. He's a klutz, a remarkably unskilled player for someone who does it at a professional level. He's ruined so many songs.
There are definitely songs he has massacred(RITFW comes to mind,) but I like that he's in the band so they can do things like Crazy Mary.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Norah »

Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Mine »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Pearl Jam was at it's best before it turned into a wank fest.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
DISAGREE
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
DISAGREE
2000 Crazy Mary or GTFO
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Rangi Guy »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
:thumbsup:
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
DISAGREE
2000 Crazy Mary or GTFO
2003 Crazy Mary makes 2000 Crazy Mary look like a little bitch.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by bodysnatcher »

Crazy Mary was at its best when it had only been played 3-4 times ever
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by EJ »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Crazy Mary was at it's best before it turned into a Boom/McCready wank fest.
DISAGREE
2000 Crazy Mary or GTFO
:thumbsup:
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Strat »

Birds in Hell wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs
:thumbsup:

On that note, my submission is that Pearl Jam shows are way too long.

Even for a band I love, somewhere in the region of 90-120 minutes (at most) is the longest I really want to hear them play live. More ≠ better.

I think the band's set length was ideal in 1998 and 2000.


I didn't want the denver show to end. Nothing was half baked. All the songs were played wonderfully. Out of their minds. Pearl jam, musically As a band, is not as bad as RM makes them out to be.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Birds in Hell »

Strat wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:I'd rather go to a show and get 16 really well-played, intense songs... instead of a 3 hour 32-song marathon of half-baked singalongs
:thumbsup:

On that note, my submission is that Pearl Jam shows are way too long.

Even for a band I love, somewhere in the region of 90-120 minutes (at most) is the longest I really want to hear them play live. More ≠ better.

I think the band's set length was ideal in 1998 and 2000.


I didn't want the denver show to end. Nothing was half baked. All the songs were played wonderfully. Out of their minds. Pearl jam, musically As a band, is not as bad as RM makes them out to be.
Don't misunderstand me, Strat: I really love Pearl Jam.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Strat »

It was more of a general comment but I quoted you.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: UNPOPULAR PEARL JAM OPINIONS

Post by Birds in Hell »

Strat wrote:It was more of a general comment but I quoted you.
:peace:
Post Reply